Reply #75

As far as the judge, have you ever seen a judge reject the evidence of law enforcement? Do you really think that a judge accepting the charges actually means anything?

Just last week, eg, we two of the first OWS cases dismissed. Guess why? Because the cops lied, under oath. But when the charges were filed, the judges obviously accepted them.

It is not the judge's job to investigate the evidence other than to his/her limited ability.

I have no recollection of a judge every saying to law enforcement, 'sorry, this looks funny to me' even when it does. Do you? Got any examples? It's possible, but the overwhelming evidence shows that when law enforcement presents evidence to a court, the judge will almost always accept the charges.

Do YOU know what the evidence is? Have you seen the video eg, of the same cops harassing these people, caught on video, claiming that they, the cops, were going to 'crack some skulls' in Chicago which those three guys put on Utube. After which they were suddenly being infiltrated and finally charged with terrorism.

Even if they were doing what is claimed, how is this terrorism? In France eg, protesters KIDNAPPED Corporate CEOs but were not even charged. Talk about over reacting and over charging, which may be in favor of the accused. Juries don't like that kind of over charging generally.

And then of course there is what their attorneys have said. We have to take that into consideration.

Smearing Social Justice movements, over charging protesters, infiltrating and planting evidence, I know, that has never happened in the US. So we just not question the authorities??