Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

intheflow

(28,451 posts)
14. I don't think so.
Fri May 25, 2012, 09:05 AM
May 2012

But even if they were, that's Jewish tradition and not how modern Christian Biblical literalists interpret the text. When they bother to read it in its entirety, that is.

So sad... DearAbby May 2012 #1
Deeerrrrrrrpah! Arctic Dave May 2012 #2
D'OH !!! alittlelark May 2012 #3
Teh Stupid... It Also Stings... A Lot... WillyT May 2012 #4
And piercings, if I recall correctly. It's been a long time since I read Leviticus. PDJane May 2012 #5
Yup. 19:28 Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #6
Leviticus forbids a lot of stuff Capn Sunshine May 2012 #7
Talk about control freaks Art_from_Ark May 2012 #10
Talk about control freaks AlbertCat May 2012 #19
Great list except footballs aren't made of pigskin anymore. progressoid May 2012 #11
I'm not sure if ANY of that was valid after the Second Testament. Zalatix May 2012 #16
I like the way you said "Second Testament" as if we should expect a third and a fourth. tclambert May 2012 #29
No, I wasn't saying that. Zalatix May 2012 #36
Nope! Cotton undies gotta go, too! SnowCritter May 2012 #20
Finally! We can all be nekked. Jamastiene May 2012 #23
Does a woman have to wear a sweater with a scarlet "M" on it? NewJeffCT May 2012 #27
My first thought before I read the script... But tattoos are forbidden, too! freshwest May 2012 #8
Ah Cafeteria Fundamentalist Christianity GObamaGO May 2012 #9
was thinking the same thing ninehippies May 2012 #21
Weren't the laws in Leviticus meant for Rabbi's only? justiceischeap May 2012 #12
I don't think so. intheflow May 2012 #14
Not for Christians. vaberella May 2012 #15
Thanks! I thought it was meant specifically as rabbinical (sp) law. nt justiceischeap May 2012 #17
True. intheflow May 2012 #25
Don'tcha love it HillWilliam May 2012 #13
Here is the backstory ecstatic May 2012 #18
I admit I would never get a tattoo myself treestar May 2012 #22
I see it as "Reminder to self, everytime I get those urges I need to look at my tatoo" OffWithTheirHeads May 2012 #24
Here's another verse (my own) Martin Eden May 2012 #26
Very cool! Maynar May 2012 #38
The derp is strong here. hifiguy May 2012 #28
They should have used a font that looks like shrimp KurtNYC May 2012 #30
Chick magnet. GeorgeGist May 2012 #31
Ah, yes, the chuckle-headed "Christians" ladym55 May 2012 #32
This says it all hifiguy May 2012 #33
LOVE IT!! ladym55 May 2012 #39
*facepalm* krispos42 May 2012 #34
K & R Scurrilous May 2012 #35
I hate so much I'm willing to pay money to etch hatred on my skin. Forever. HughBeaumont May 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Priceless! Another one f...»Reply #14