HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I have to side with Wal-M... » Reply #26

Reply #26


Response to liberal N proud (Original post)

Wed May 16, 2012, 09:48 AM

26. Have to agree that Walmart isn't at fault here -

- We would feel differently about this case if this occurred at a small mom and pop shop. To want to make Walmart liable and pay for something that was not their fault isn't justice - it's vigilantism.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 44 replies Author Time Post
liberal N proud May 2012 OP
Meiko May 2012 #1
liberal N proud May 2012 #2
Forward2012 May 2012 #4
Maine-ah May 2012 #35
randome May 2012 #37
Ian David May 2012 #20
randome May 2012 #3
Logical May 2012 #10
Meiko May 2012 #44
Baitball Blogger May 2012 #22
Cave_Johnson May 2012 #5
Logical May 2012 #8
lame54 May 2012 #6
Logical May 2012 #9
lame54 May 2012 #12
liberal N proud May 2012 #13
lame54 May 2012 #16
Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #23
lame54 May 2012 #32
Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #36
lame54 May 2012 #39
Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #40
lame54 May 2012 #43
qazplm May 2012 #18
Bake May 2012 #28
Buns_of_Fire May 2012 #7
randome May 2012 #15
Buns_of_Fire May 2012 #17
Kaleva May 2012 #24
Bake May 2012 #29
pinboy3niner May 2012 #31
LeftinOH May 2012 #11
Blue_Tires May 2012 #14
Amaril May 2012 #30
obamanut2012 May 2012 #19
Nuclear Unicorn May 2012 #21
sharp_stick May 2012 #25
LineReply Have to agree that Walmart isn't at fault here -
lynne May 2012 #26
hifiguy May 2012 #27
Remmah2 May 2012 #33
4th law of robotics May 2012 #34
-..__... May 2012 #38
jp11 May 2012 #41
Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #42
Please login to view edit histories.