Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Nothing should be left unturned....they hounded President Obama on his church, his wife, his race, [View all]bluesbassman
(19,360 posts)54. Question; how is that moral authority going to taste if Mitt sits in the oval office?
How much good will moral authority do when he appoints two or three or possibly four Supreme Court Justices?
I've been a Democrat all my life, but I gotta tell you I'm tired of getting my political ass kicked by knuckle dragging bullies who don't give two squirts abut fairness or morals.
The first punch was thrown years ago, and it wasn't us. That's enough moral authority for me.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
115 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nothing should be left unturned....they hounded President Obama on his church, his wife, his race, [View all]
demtenjeep
May 2012
OP
Very few are that blatant. Usually just a bit more subtle but specific religions do get called out.
bluesbassman
May 2012
#52
did I say specifically a whole faith? I said it is time to fight fire with fire
demtenjeep
May 2012
#16
Instead of getting personal, we can prove to the public what Mittens will do to them personally!
freshwest
May 2012
#26
When Romney's wife stops trying to influence an election and lauds their family life
aint_no_life_nowhere
May 2012
#17
Nothing wrong with that and nothing wrong with calling her out on that
aint_no_life_nowhere
May 2012
#27
Yep. And the same goes for 'faith'. Once they use it in their politics, the same rules
Bluenorthwest
May 2012
#38
Because if we do not win, unemployment will increase to 25-30%. And
coalition_unwilling
May 2012
#88
and if we do win, but we're no better than the repugs, then what have we won? nt
StarryNight
May 2012
#98
correct; but don't expect to find any support for taking the high road here. nt
StarryNight
May 2012
#97
Yep. Of course I think all of Christianity is batshit insane with a double dose of moonbattery
Taverner
May 2012
#35
So does that mean you can't support a candidate who is a self-described Christian?
onenote
May 2012
#78
How can anybody who condemned those attacks turn around and do the same thing with a straight face?
RZM
May 2012
#45
Agreed, but likely all you're going to hear is a version of "but that's different." n/t.
apocalypsehow
May 2012
#46
Kick ass with the truth. Repuks attack with lies and misrepresentations. That is the difference
Maineman
May 2012
#51
Question; how is that moral authority going to taste if Mitt sits in the oval office?
bluesbassman
May 2012
#54
better to fight fire with a fire extinguisher - like facts, logic, and morality. nt
StarryNight
May 2012
#100
I am not just talking about religion I am saying we need to use everything we have
demtenjeep
May 2012
#67
I think the Wright episode was very different. This is hypocrisy. That was the media editing.
Gregorian
May 2012
#70
Hounding Romney over his religious beliefs will not make Obama more likely to win re-election.
Nye Bevan
May 2012
#73
The attacks on President Obama are divisive, our attacks should be in favor of building coalitions.
Zalatix
May 2012
#104