Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
Sun May 13, 2012, 10:26 PM May 2012

Paul Krugman: Why We Regulate [View all]

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/14/opinion/krugman-why-we-regulate.html

OP-ED COLUMNIST

Why We Regulate

By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: May 13, 2012

- snip -

As far as we know, Jamie Dimon, the chairman and C.E.O. of JPMorgan Chase, isn’t planning anything similar. He has, however, been fond of giving Gatewood-like speeches about how he and his colleagues know what they’re doing, and don’t need the government looking over their shoulders. So there’s a large heap of poetic justice — and a major policy lesson — in JPMorgan’s shock announcement that it somehow managed to lose $2 billion in a failed bit of financial wheeling-dealing.

- snip -

So what can be done? In the 1930s, after the mother of all banking panics, we arrived at a workable solution, involving both guarantees and oversight. On one side, the scope for panic was limited via government-backed deposit insurance; on the other, banks were subject to regulations intended to keep them from abusing the privileged status they derived from deposit insurance, which is in effect a government guarantee of their debts. Most notably, banks with government-guaranteed deposits weren’t allowed to engage in the often risky speculation characteristic of investment banks like Lehman Brothers.

- snip -

Enter Mr. Dimon. JPMorgan, to its — and his — credit, managed to avoid many of the bad investments that brought other banks to their knees. This apparent demonstration of prudence has made Mr. Dimon the point man in Wall Street’s fight to delay, water down and/or repeal financial reform. He has been particularly vocal in his opposition to the so-called Volcker Rule, which would prevent banks with government-guaranteed deposits from engaging in “proprietary trading,” basically speculating with depositors’ money. Just trust us, the JPMorgan chief has in effect been saying; everything’s under control.

Apparently not.

What did JPMorgan actually do? As far as we can tell, it used the market for derivatives — complex financial instruments — to make a huge bet on the safety of corporate debt, something like the bets that the insurer A.I.G. made on housing debt a few years ago. The key point is not that the bet went bad; it is that institutions playing a key role in the financial system have no business making such bets, least of all when those institutions are backed by taxpayer guarantees.

- snip -

But the truth is that we’ve just seen an object demonstration of why Wall Street does, in fact, need to be regulated. Thank you, Mr. Dimon.

MORE[p]
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Paul Krugman: Why We Regulate [View all] Hissyspit May 2012 OP
k/r Dawson Leery May 2012 #1
K&R....n/t unkachuck May 2012 #2
yup ibegurpard May 2012 #3
k+r. nt limpyhobbler May 2012 #4
Spot on from Krugman suffragette May 2012 #5
The man's a genius. SpankMe May 2012 #6
Thanks. Hissyspit May 2012 #7
K&R. It's almost like he knows what he's talking about. Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #8
n/t Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #9
K & R !!! - Thank You !!! WillyT May 2012 #10
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Paul Krugman: Why We Regu...