Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The Evolution Paradigm Shift [View all]tama
(9,137 posts)6. "Active information"
is a Bohmian notion related to quantum physics and biologists looking for link to physics to explain self-organization (eg. the capacity of living organisms to alter their own heredity) would do well to look in that direction. Matti Pitkänen has developed the idea further giving it also mathematical anatomy (cells as holographic quantum computers etc.).
As for dogma or paradigm of materialistic determinism, Pitkänen does not mince his words:
If one accepts the non-materialistic view - that is quantum jump as a re-creation, then causality of volition is unavoidably the core element of consciousness.
For the materialistic approach (Pribram) the causality of volition reduces to that of deterministic laws of nature and the challenge is to why we should have the illusory experiences of choice and decision. Why almost everything we say spontaneously reflects these experiences? To exclude from world view something so fundamental is madness. This madness originated in the Newtonian revolution, which led to the belief that the laws of Nature must be fully deterministic.
Personally I have never experienced the wonderful feeling that as a physicist in deterministic world I can in principle predict everything: I am the Overlord. But I remember how difficult it was still to get the courage to see the absolutely obvious: the majority of the science community is deadly wrong. The psychological root of materialism are in a primitive greed for power.
http://matpitka.blogspot.com/2012/05/mystery-of-time-again.html#comments
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
62 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I didn't write the articles. I didn't notice shapiro saying anything like what you attribute to him
HiPointDem
May 2012
#2
why don't you paste the passage you're referring to when you say i didn't read the article.
HiPointDem
May 2012
#4
"someone who says they have the truth and that others aren't listening" doesn't equal
HiPointDem
May 2012
#22
You realize that you linked a joke, right? The page generates random pomo-sounding fake essays.
HiPointDem
May 2012
#26
You're talking about a book by a credentialed scientist who, among other accomplishments,
HiPointDem
May 2012
#33
If I were as snarky as some of the folks on this thread I would have been all over that, you
HiPointDem
May 2012
#35
interesting. the majority of the posters dismiss with a single word/line = "woo".
HiPointDem
May 2012
#23
Shapiro is a spoon-bender? Does he do that when he's not doing bacterial genetics?
HiPointDem
May 2012
#34
no, it doesn't mean he's "right". i don't think his book is about being "right" so much as you seem
HiPointDem
May 2012
#39
I'm not sure the complexity he observes cannot be incorporated into mainstream evolution.
aikoaiko
May 2012
#27
Newton knew his theory was incomplete at best, and possibly wrong from the get go...
Humanist_Activist
May 2012
#60
It's only math jargon if you're talking about math, otherwise it's just nonsense
mathematic
May 2012
#53