Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

RiverLover

(7,830 posts)
22. Warren tried in 2013 with her "21st Century Glass-Steagall Act" bill which breaks up the banks
Sat May 9, 2015, 12:33 PM
May 2015

like they were until Clinton signed the repeal of FDR's Glass-Steagall right before leaving office...

But it didn't get enough votes.

So we just need to elect a congress that will support it & a non-conservative president to sign it.

Having a president who is truly progressive once elected and not just playing progressive to win votes is the hard part.

Congress passed the Glass Steagall Act in 1933 to separate risky investment banking from ordinary commercial banking. And for half a century, the banking system was stable and our middle class grew stronger.

But in the 1980s, the federal regulators started reinterpreting the laws to break down the divide between regular banking and Wall Street risk-taking, and in 1999, Congress repealed Glass Steagall altogether. Wall Street had spent 66 years and millions of dollars lobbying for repeal, and, eventually, the big banks won.

I've joined forces with Senators John McCain, Maria Cantwell, and Angus King to introduce the 21st Century Glass Steagall Act of 2013 to reinstate and modernize core banking protections.

Our new 21st Century Glass Steagall Act once again separates traditional banks from riskier financial services. And since banking has become much more complicated since the first bill was written in 1933, we’ve updated the law to include new activities and leave no room for regulatory interpretations that water down the rules.

The bill will give a five year transition period for financial institutions to split their business practices into distinct entities – shrinking their size, taking an important step toward ending “Too Big to Fail” once and for all, and minimizing the risk of future bailouts.

http://my.elizabethwarren.com/page/s/glass-steagall

A political reality check. [View all] kentuck May 2015 OP
In the foreseeable future which is all a reasonable person can purport to see DemocratSinceBirth May 2015 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author whatchamacallit May 2015 #12
Here is another reality check - what will happen if we do not even try? djean111 May 2015 #2
I agree. kentuck May 2015 #4
I'm confused. Didn't Obama get obstructed on almost everything? WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2015 #20
Absolutely. I am very afraid that the answer to the last question may actually be: another Great jwirr May 2015 #5
In my view ... 1StrongBlackMan May 2015 #3
And if we don't find some way to make that change, Jackpine Radical May 2015 #6
The more important question is what will become onecaliberal May 2015 #7
Here are some things people were told about political realism in the past Bjorn Against May 2015 #8
Very difficult MaggieD May 2015 #9
To make changes to future realities... kentuck May 2015 #10
You're surprised rethugs are in charge.... MaggieD May 2015 #11
I'm not surprised Republicans are in charge... kentuck May 2015 #13
Well let's put it this way.... MaggieD May 2015 #14
Yeah, liberals really suck. kentuck May 2015 #15
The ones that bash Democrats do MaggieD May 2015 #16
You are bashing Democrats Bjorn Against May 2015 #18
People that spend their life bashing... MaggieD May 2015 #26
Well they sound like happy republicans.... MaggieD May 2015 #27
For someone who says you don't like seeing attacks on Democrats... Bjorn Against May 2015 #17
Which of the purists here.... MaggieD May 2015 #19
You don't have to run for office to be a Democrat Bjorn Against May 2015 #23
If people are going to parrot.... MaggieD May 2015 #24
This country will make no forward progress workinclasszero May 2015 #21
Warren tried in 2013 with her "21st Century Glass-Steagall Act" bill which breaks up the banks RiverLover May 2015 #22
Agreedd. Until we elect enough non-repubs nothing good will happen. riqster May 2015 #30
There were also "far-sighted" republicans in FDR's congress. "Progessive" Republicans even~ RiverLover May 2015 #34
The next admin won't have this advantage: Obama's quid pro quo on raising taxes WhaTHellsgoingonhere May 2015 #25
Here's the political reality: Maedhros May 2015 #28
all you have to do is look to obama yrs and how hard it was. see what happened to bill he passed seabeyond May 2015 #29
As long as many Americans seem to believe moondust May 2015 #31
This message was self-deleted by its author AtomicKitten May 2015 #32
i think we have to address state power and gerrymandering to really get the support. seabeyond May 2015 #33
The first and third could have been accomplished during the Exilednight May 2015 #35
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A political reality check...»Reply #22