Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
credit pulls FOR CREDIT are different than other credit pulls. unblock May 2012 #1
They aren't suppose to affect your credit but what I've been hearing is that they are affecting Justice wanted May 2012 #2
that sounds like a company lawyer's response. unblock May 2012 #4
I do understand what you are saying that it isn't suppose to affect credit but I'm saying companies Justice wanted May 2012 #7
i agree that credit scores are chock full of errors and the accuracy standards suck unblock May 2012 #8
This is why I posted this. Credit checks shouldn't affect people but they are. Credit Reports Justice wanted May 2012 #10
yowza, hope all the medical problems are behind you. unblock May 2012 #28
Thank you. Justice wanted May 2012 #29
I was talking to a mortgage guy ashling May 2012 #9
Credit scoring isn't that black and white. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #3
Yes, I realize late payment and missed payment affect credit BUT The first example I gave of my Justice wanted May 2012 #6
Sorry, but there is no possible way a FICO score would move 650 points due to inquiries. bluesbassman May 2012 #11
He can't image what else other than inquieres did that. He was always on time with payments-usually Justice wanted May 2012 #16
Something is certainly wrong then. He should contact the Credit Bureaus to investigate. bluesbassman May 2012 #22
A judgement against him, perhaps? Stargazer09 May 2012 #80
I had a foreclosure and owe a CC company about $1000.. tridim May 2012 #70
i'll agree that credit pulls for employment is a poor boss's crutch. unblock May 2012 #13
unsolicited credit offers ashling May 2012 #12
unsolicited lenders are allowed to use a limited credit pull that doesn't affect your score unblock May 2012 #15
You have the right to block them. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #26
I'm not talking hundreds of points, ashling May 2012 #33
Sorry - was referring to the original comments Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #36
What's the saying, if you owe the bank $150,000 they own you, ashling May 2012 #43
Yeah, it is - and when you have that kind of cash Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #55
You can go to the FTC website and opt out of unsolicited offers. Fuddnik May 2012 #40
I'll certainly follow up on that, ashling May 2012 #46
double kick!!! Liberal_in_LA May 2012 #5
Great bullshit post joeglow3 May 2012 #14
I AM NOT MAKING THING UP! Justice wanted May 2012 #18
Yeah. He went from 100% perfect score to the only person 100 points below the minimum. joeglow3 May 2012 #27
No, but this story is wrong or missing MAJOR details REP May 2012 #62
"I AM NOT MAKING THING UP!" A-Schwarzenegger May 2012 #77
No fair! sibelian May 2012 #83
I will gladly A-Schwarzenegger May 2012 #86
I agree guardian May 2012 #32
My understanding is that all 3 use the same basic FICO model joeglow3 May 2012 #37
I think there are some differences. guardian May 2012 #42
While the poster, or the poster's friend, obviously got the numbers wrong, Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #50
We know the poster was discussing the impact of credit checks joeglow3 May 2012 #87
There is a woman Control-Z May 2012 #17
hmmm, Maybe this is something my friend should into if someone has a name similar to him OR Justice wanted May 2012 #19
I hate seeing threads like this that spread misinformation. slackmaster May 2012 #20
I am not misinforming people. Your credit score is affecting you more than you THINK! Justice wanted May 2012 #21
I am sure my credit score impacts much more than I am aware of, bighart May 2012 #24
I'm very well aware of how Bank of America has messed up my credit scores through false reporting slackmaster May 2012 #25
The story you're telling is missing details and is wrong in others REP May 2012 #64
That is not how credit scores work. First there is a difference between hard and soft credit checks WhollyHeretic May 2012 #23
I have no data to back this up but I strongly suspect that credit ratings are jimlup May 2012 #30
Not Capitalism. The problem is Fascism. slackmaster May 2012 #34
Corporate and state rule magic59 May 2012 #82
I agree. There is also a very insidious use here as well Horse with no Name May 2012 #31
The OP is urban myth and hysteria guardian May 2012 #35
Pretty much. 850 score, for one, is suspicious; 850 to 200 from score being alone pulled is fantasy REP May 2012 #61
Divorce itself can be a major "event" that affects credit scores SoCalDem May 2012 #38
Hello Consumer Financial Protection Bureau bl968 May 2012 #39
Such a rule already exists. See § 614 of the Fair Credit Reporting Act. slackmaster May 2012 #44
If employers didn't find useful information, they would not pay to do the credit check FarCenter May 2012 #41
"irresponsible in one aspect of their life is likely to be irresponsible in other aspects" guardian May 2012 #48
and for financial companies, a good credit rating is an indication of "something left to lose" magical thyme May 2012 #56
Then maybe it would be wise for all potential employees to do a credit check blackspade May 2012 #57
That's a very good idea FarCenter May 2012 #59
Maybe not? guardian May 2012 #66
Well thanks! blackspade May 2012 #74
I don't disagree. guardian May 2012 #78
Nice job pissing on the working class there. Zalatix May 2012 #67
Your credit score is an indicator of how valuable you are to a creditor. rucky May 2012 #75
I imagine Bernie Madoff and Ken Lay had outstanding credit ratings... LanternWaste May 2012 #84
While I agree that Credit Checks are a Problem, OP is Incorrect on One Point Indykatie May 2012 #45
How about either requiring credit rating agencies to publicize their criteria Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #47
Their criteria are published and well-documented. Their specific algorithms are proprietary. slackmaster May 2012 #49
No they aren't. What is "public information" are vague guidelines with no specific Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #51
The courts have ruled that credit agencies and lenders CAN have private actions brought against them slackmaster May 2012 #53
I've been down that road myself, I can certainly understand your dilemma. Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #63
Bank of America is clearly in violation of the California Civil Code in my case, but I doubt... slackmaster May 2012 #65
I'm afraid you can "bank" on it. Too many of "our" representatives have made fortunes Egalitarian Thug May 2012 #89
The worst case for me is the fraudulent derogatory credit ages off slackmaster May 2012 #90
Orange Julius used to play for the 76ers. Major Hogwash May 2012 #52
I've often wondered why a credit check negatively affects the credit score. KansDem May 2012 #54
People who have made numerous application for credit are statistically a bit more likely to default slackmaster May 2012 #58
Thanks KansDem May 2012 #79
You don't go from 850 to 200 from having your credit score pulled REP May 2012 #60
I run credit ratings every day. The op is bs. NCTraveler May 2012 #68
YOU KNOW FOR ALL THOSE PEOPLE WHO CLAIM I AM TALKING OUT OF MY ASS I WILL TELL YOU Justice wanted May 2012 #69
I used to work Credit and Collections for SWBell. Credit reports don't work that way. REP May 2012 #71
RE post 69: "I AM TALKING OUT OF MY ASS" guardian May 2012 #72
Sounds like post hoc ergo propter hoc slackmaster May 2012 #76
This thread is exemplary of something I see often. lumberjack_jeff May 2012 #81
Its definitely a reflection of the power the private sector can wield. napoleon_in_rags May 2012 #73
I pay for monthly credit reports on myself mainer May 2012 #85
Get it out of employment...Period!! Left Coast2020 May 2012 #88
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»What you may not have kno...»Reply #27