Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PufPuf23

(8,754 posts)
12. The Cobell vs Salazar settlement ended all American Indian claims against the US Federal Government
Sat May 5, 2012, 03:05 PM
May 2012

for Indian Trust lands (Reservations and Allotments) sold under the Dawes Act and monies lost by BIA mis-management of natural resources on Indian Trust lands.

The settlement was for less than $0.02 on the dollar in economic terms ignoring cultural damage and excludes most American Indians.

Many American Indian leaders and the Obama Administration consider the settlement a "win" rather than a political convenience even though most American Indians are excluded.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobell_v._Salazar

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dawes_Act

About 100 million acres of Indian Trust lands were sold by the DOI/BIA under the Dawes Act. Individual Tribes were harmed more than the $2 Billion allotted for the entire USA.

From the FAQ at : http://www.cobellsettlement.com/


2. What am I giving up as part of the Settlement?

If the Settlement becomes final, you will give up your right to sue the federal government for the claims being resolved by this Settlement. The specific claims you are giving up against the federal government are described in Section A, paragraphs 14, 15, and 21 of the Settlement Agreement. You will be "releasing" the federal government and all related people as described in Section I of the Settlement Agreement.

If you did not receive an IIM account statement for 2009, you may request your IIM account balance as of September 30, 2009 by calling 888-678-6836. If you request your IIM account balance, you are agreeing to the balance provided by Interior unless you excluded yourself from the Settlement (see Excluding Yourself From the Settlement).

The Settlement Agreement describes the released claims with specific descriptions, so read it carefully. If you have any questions, you can talk to Class Counsel for free or you can talk to your own lawyer at your own expense.

Land by itself doesn't do much. What determines economic gain is what you do with the land. dkf May 2012 #1
Well ........ yeah. polly7 May 2012 #2
But he has to do something to get that economic gain. dkf May 2012 #6
I've farmed and raised animals ...... it's not all that difficult, and of course Native polly7 May 2012 #9
So their current financial difficulties aren't due to lack of knowledge or education and are dkf May 2012 #15
Owning land equals the opportunity to profit from it in any way they choose. polly7 May 2012 #33
But it was ever said its was the 'cure all' MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #10
Maybe you should read the article RC May 2012 #19
"Edited to add: I can't believe the callus racism of some posters here." MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #26
Yeah, especially since that poster usually gives full-throated support of private property. Starry Messenger May 2012 #28
How do you know what this man has done or hasn't done stranger81 May 2012 #20
If I were the UN I would not expect a response malaise May 2012 #3
More the pity (nt) MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #11
Indeed malaise May 2012 #24
And the wingers already think the UN is a plot against them.... Scuba May 2012 #4
Which is crazy since it was President Wilson who laid the groundwork for the UN...an American Pres! vaberella May 2012 #7
Exactly customerserviceguy May 2012 #17
And what about Mexico, UN? You seriously think that Mexico would waste it's time with Texas now? vaberella May 2012 #5
For that matter Mexico has treated its natives horribly 4th law of robotics May 2012 #29
I think we should either leave their land left on green only May 2012 #8
Beat me too it. Richard D May 2012 #14
You got the amount wrong. Anyone who knows American history RebelOne May 2012 #25
The Cobell vs Salazar settlement ended all American Indian claims against the US Federal Government PufPuf23 May 2012 #12
Give back what was stolen by force? NOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!! Zalatix May 2012 #13
Expected response: Jester Messiah May 2012 #16
k&r n/t RainDog May 2012 #18
Then Indian tribes should return stolen land to whoever... Amonester May 2012 #21
It is obviously impossible to return North America to its pre 1492 condition mysuzuki2 May 2012 #22
Relatives of the australian aborigine 4th law of robotics May 2012 #23
wtf? cali May 2012 #27
Although I think all Native tribes should have a lot better living conditions Amonester May 2012 #34
The US made treaties with the Indians and broke them think May 2012 #32
And why would the Native Americans have taken the land from? Zalatix May 2012 #35
If people are living in poverty and squalor..... eek MD May 2012 #30
Bump MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #31
+1 thanks. Mc Mike May 2012 #36
If the Seminoles were returned their land lost in era of the Trail of Tears ... lpbk2713 May 2012 #37
Du rec. Nt xchrom May 2012 #38
kickety! countryjake May 2012 #39
Pictures it makes it harder for the apologista. (nt) MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #40
We grew up really close to a reservation. YellowRubberDuckie May 2012 #41
This is always a silly suggestion... MellowDem May 2012 #42
Professor Anaya disagrees with you. MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #43
James Anaya, UN Special Rapporteur on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples visits NCAI MichaelMcGuire May 2012 #44
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»US should return stolen l...»Reply #12