Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Capt. Obvious

(9,002 posts)
64. I've watched enough tv to know that this is totally not admissible
Fri May 4, 2012, 10:25 AM
May 2012

His attorneys should have yelled, "objection!"

Classic fuck up

Call me naive, but I don't believe it. HiPointDem May 2012 #1
This story came out years ago Capt. Obvious May 2012 #4
that doesn't make me believe it any more than i did before. it does make me wonder though, HiPointDem May 2012 #9
Im sorry ... But your assertions seem patently ridiculous ... Trajan May 2012 #26
It goes to what Elizabeth knew when - it is clear that she was at minimum karynnj May 2012 #31
It doesn't make sense because it was not driven by the rational part of Elizabeth Edwards karynnj May 2012 #30
why would this witness commit perjury? Enrique May 2012 #35
Public and private personas are quite often day and night RZM May 2012 #44
Excuse me but Rehnquist was a racist prick. He had Solomon May 2012 #46
I didn't say he wasn't RZM May 2012 #48
but political wives can and do make scenes. Ever hear of Martha Mitchell? cali May 2012 #62
"Grandpa, grandma has a new man living at her house".. Fumesucker May 2012 #2
You're right malaise May 2012 #6
with malaise.... not gender specific. women are almost at the same percentage as men. nt seabeyond May 2012 #20
As a fellow who twice was married to women with whom I later had "incompatible sleeping habits" TahitiNut May 2012 #25
Ouch. That just sucks. TwilightGardener May 2012 #36
ugh. laundry_queen May 2012 #40
I have been betrayed SemperEadem May 2012 #3
+1. HiPointDem May 2012 #10
I find your assessment of what she did judgmental. msanthrope May 2012 #18
ooh, someone can't read SemperEadem May 2012 #55
But she DID do the actions you judged so harshly. msanthrope May 2012 #67
Some have the patience of Job .... Trajan May 2012 #27
Were you suffering from cancer and involved in a presidential campaign at the time? FedUpWithIt All May 2012 #34
the issue I'm discussing is betrayal SemperEadem May 2012 #56
In real life, which she was dealing with cold, you do not just isolate things like that. FedUpWithIt All May 2012 #66
Yeah, but you didn't have to publicly cheerlead your husband CoffeeCat May 2012 #42
TOTALLY agree, I'm glad she was able to Raine May 2012 #74
"She was entitled to a major, four-alarm, epic meltdown. Look at everything she endured." Number23 May 2012 #75
we all have different reactions to stress Whisp May 2012 #65
chemotherapy impacts people's memories and emotions, even after it is over nt magical thyme May 2012 #70
i doubt she did this madrchsod May 2012 #5
Ms. Reynolds is under a legal obligation to not keep her mouth shut about her friend. msanthrope May 2012 #7
I expect more people to chime in that they don't believe this story Capt. Obvious May 2012 #8
Well, denial is a powerful thing. That her personal friends have testified to this msanthrope May 2012 #15
whether or not ms edwards ripped off her bra has fuck all to do with whether edwards used HiPointDem May 2012 #11
I don't believe Edwards had a mistress Capt. Obvious May 2012 #13
How do you explain Rielle Hunter getting pregnant by Edwards during the campain? n/t cynatnite May 2012 #16
that doesn't make me believe it any more than i did before Capt. Obvious May 2012 #24
Are you related to unionworks? karynnj May 2012 #33
Even though Edwards admitted the affair and claimed the child as his? n/t cynatnite May 2012 #37
Actually, it does....the prosecution is doing a great job establishing why John Edwards msanthrope May 2012 #14
They had already established his motives with previous witnesses. n/t cynatnite May 2012 #19
You think the prosecution is going to leave a stone unturned? msanthrope May 2012 #22
To me this is just dirty laundry... cynatnite May 2012 #38
I agree- Bluerthanblue May 2012 #50
I agree, as well. hamsterjill May 2012 #53
exactly SemperEadem May 2012 #57
the Kenneth Starr playbook of prosecution. grasswire May 2012 #77
You're exactly right customerserviceguy May 2012 #23
I think your post accurately describes the prosecution strategy. msanthrope May 2012 #29
If I were on the jury, I would be disgusted by the prosecution introducing this clearly sensational sabrina 1 May 2012 #72
The thing that gets me customerserviceguy May 2012 #76
Honestly, it does not matter whether this happened or not... cynatnite May 2012 #12
Anything to completely finish him off, I guess. Meanwhile.... SammyWinstonJack May 2012 #28
+1 andlor May 2012 #58
Odd reaction to be sure, but PotatoChip May 2012 #17
Your post describes exactly what I was thinking....she showed him her scars. msanthrope May 2012 #21
+1 arthritisR_US May 2012 #32
Yeah, this is exactly what I was thinking. nt Poll_Blind May 2012 #39
Is there any 'correct' way? laundry_queen May 2012 #41
Well said n/t Spazito May 2012 #49
+1000 Wind Dancer May 2012 #60
Makes perfect sense to me. Hell Hath No Fury May 2012 #43
Sounds like Miranda Richardson in "Damage" Blue_Tires May 2012 #45
Sometimes I wonder if we really need this kind of information from the media. MineralMan May 2012 #47
That was my first reaction. Baitball Blogger May 2012 #52
no, we don't need to know this. Bluerthanblue May 2012 #54
I agree, I do not see what this does for the prosecution's case other than disgust decent human sabrina 1 May 2012 #73
What she must have suffered. It's just unbelievable the additional torment Baitball Blogger May 2012 #51
How is this even admissible? and for what purpose, other than to make him look bad? ChairmanAgnostic May 2012 #59
I've watched enough tv to know that this is totally not admissible Capt. Obvious May 2012 #64
someting doesn't add up. magical thyme May 2012 #61
how about the reaction of a wife who had taken her husband's cali May 2012 #63
I hadn't seen that magical thyme May 2012 #68
She put in writing that she thought the affair had ended cali May 2012 #69
oh, I totally understand it magical thyme May 2012 #71
John Edwards was a phony even before news of the affair came out ... slipslidingaway May 2012 #78
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»John Edwards' betrayed wi...»Reply #64