Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Maryland court finds pit bulls are 'inherently dangerous' [View all]MadHound
(34,179 posts)60. Perhaps rather than being continually fearful of pits,
Get to know your friend's dogs. I mean really now, basing your opinion on hyperbolic media frenzy without getting to know some members of the species? Sad, truly sad.
Next time you're over at your friend's place, go out back and get to know the dogs. About the worse that will happen is you'll get a full face doggy kiss.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
huh? I thought dog owners already were responsible for their dog's behavior
magical thyme
May 2012
#5
Huh? One decision that you disagree with makes all Maryland judges "stupid"
madinmaryland
May 2012
#22
I understand careless ownership, but isn't a careless owner of a small dog
RadiationTherapy
May 2012
#12
Then they'd better ban dachshunds as well. Mine attack pit bulls, who run in terror.
TrogL
May 2012
#26
That's what I keep getting told about the lottery, but I still buy a ticket every week. :) n/t
cynatnite
May 2012
#53
According to wikipedia it's a combination of pit terrior and bulldog. Is this not correct? n/t
cynatnite
May 2012
#55
It's the owners, not the dogs! How about banning certain people from keeping dogs?
Quantess
May 2012
#65