Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Maryland court finds pit bulls are 'inherently dangerous' [View all]guitar man
(15,996 posts)48. My APBT is obsessed
With her food bowl. When, oh when am I going to eat? Feed me!!
Oh, and sleeping, she's real good at that lol
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
80 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
huh? I thought dog owners already were responsible for their dog's behavior
magical thyme
May 2012
#5
Huh? One decision that you disagree with makes all Maryland judges "stupid"
madinmaryland
May 2012
#22
I understand careless ownership, but isn't a careless owner of a small dog
RadiationTherapy
May 2012
#12
Then they'd better ban dachshunds as well. Mine attack pit bulls, who run in terror.
TrogL
May 2012
#26
That's what I keep getting told about the lottery, but I still buy a ticket every week. :) n/t
cynatnite
May 2012
#53
According to wikipedia it's a combination of pit terrior and bulldog. Is this not correct? n/t
cynatnite
May 2012
#55
It's the owners, not the dogs! How about banning certain people from keeping dogs?
Quantess
May 2012
#65