Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(56,177 posts)

17. I agree...I'm actually appalled the way this judge ruled...

Wed May 2, 2012, 05:46 PM

May 2012

Sucks for the woman who bought it, but she bloew it...her case is against the maker of the scanner or the store.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the judge right? Woman who lost Ark. lotto ticket entitled to $1M [View all] mfcorey1 May 2012 OP

the only people, if anyone, who should be remotely liable for this ProdigalJunkMail May 2012 #1

Not if she threw it away it doesn't. NYC Liberal May 2012 #3

Note who brought the original action jberryhill May 2012 #12

How could ownership have been established? 4lbs May 2012 #6

In most places, it is a bearer document jberryhill May 2012 #7

Exactly. greytdemocrat May 2012 #10

But how do you really know that the lady claiming to avebury May 2012 #8

The original action was brought by the store, not the other woman jberryhill May 2012 #11

I lost one too liberal N proud May 2012 #4

Hell No The Judge is Wrong dballance May 2012 #5

Interesting but subtle difference dballance May 2012 #14

Sounds like a chain reaction jberryhill May 2012 #16

everybody in that store that day could claim it was their ticket magical thyme May 2012 #9

Higher courts will overturn the judge. bluestate10 May 2012 #15

I agree...I'm actually appalled the way this judge ruled... joeybee12 May 2012 #17

I was really surprised by this verdict obamanut2012 May 2012 #18

That's not their only scam TrogL May 2012 #21

Possession is 9/10 of the law. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #22