Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

(62,444 posts)

11. The original action was brought by the store, not the other woman

Wed May 2, 2012, 12:43 PM

May 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

22 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the judge right? Woman who lost Ark. lotto ticket entitled to $1M [View all] mfcorey1 May 2012 OP

the only people, if anyone, who should be remotely liable for this ProdigalJunkMail May 2012 #1

Not if she threw it away it doesn't. NYC Liberal May 2012 #3

Note who brought the original action jberryhill May 2012 #12

How could ownership have been established? 4lbs May 2012 #6

In most places, it is a bearer document jberryhill May 2012 #7

Exactly. greytdemocrat May 2012 #10

But how do you really know that the lady claiming to avebury May 2012 #8

The original action was brought by the store, not the other woman jberryhill May 2012 #11

I lost one too liberal N proud May 2012 #4

Hell No The Judge is Wrong dballance May 2012 #5

Interesting but subtle difference dballance May 2012 #14

Sounds like a chain reaction jberryhill May 2012 #16

everybody in that store that day could claim it was their ticket magical thyme May 2012 #9

Higher courts will overturn the judge. bluestate10 May 2012 #15

I agree...I'm actually appalled the way this judge ruled... joeybee12 May 2012 #17

I was really surprised by this verdict obamanut2012 May 2012 #18

That's not their only scam TrogL May 2012 #21

Possession is 9/10 of the law. Ruby the Liberal May 2012 #22