Reply #4

Thu Apr 26, 2012, 04:31 PM

Cleita (64,444 posts)

the 1% has a definite resonance and shouldn't be thrown away.

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

19 replies	Author	Time	Post
A suggestion to everyone, especially Occupy: ditch the phrase "1%" in favor of "Plutocrats" [View all]	Zalatix	Apr 2012	OP
'1%' is a lot simpler and understandable than 'plutocrats'. n/t	PoliticAverse	Apr 2012	#1
Yep. Simple is best. Folks would not have a clue.	got root	Apr 2012	#13
I agree. 1% works.	applegrove	Apr 2012	#18
Nice idea - but I'd guess that	GoneOffShore	Apr 2012	#2
Accuracy does not always inspire people.	randome	Apr 2012	#3
How about the plutocratic 1% if you want to define it better. However,	Cleita	Apr 2012	#4
Why take something that's easily remembered and make it more complicated? Liberal bumper stickers	myrna minx	Apr 2012	#5
no thanks	Warren Stupidity	Apr 2012	#6
I like 1%. About 30% of Americans think you're speaking of them when you say "plutocrat".	Scuba	Apr 2012	#7
Why should we care about people from Pluto?	Speck Tater	Apr 2012	#8
Because 'Plutocrat' justly excludes 1%'ers like this one:	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#10
It's more likely she's the 2% or 5%	Speck Tater	Apr 2012	#14
President Obama did a GREAT job of picking names when he picked "Social Darwinism"	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#15
I'm not sure how much he picked that as.........	socialist_n_TN	Apr 2012	#16
If it ain't broke, don't fix it...	ljm2002	Apr 2012	#9
No. Don't	Vanje	Apr 2012	#11
Trouble is...all those less informed folks don't know what Plutocrat means and won't bother looking	Auntie Bush	Apr 2012	#12
I just use capitalist.........	socialist_n_TN	Apr 2012	#17
I can't believe I am going to say this	WinniSkipper	Apr 2012	#19

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.