Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

In reply to the discussion: Democrats are PUSSIES! [View all]

muriel_volestrangler

(101,271 posts)
25. Paul Krugman? This week? Obama spokesman? Yesterday?
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 01:39 PM
Apr 2012
But Romney's poor choice of a factory for his photo-op aside, I guess accusing Obama of not doing enough to promote recovery is a better argument than blaming him for the effects of Bush policies. However, it's not much better, since Romney is essentially advocating a return to those very same Bush policies. And he's hoping that you don't remember how badly those policies worked.

For the Bush era didn't just end in catastrophe; it started off badly, too. Yes, Obama's jobs record has been disappointing -- but it has been unambiguously better than Bush's over the comparable period of his administration.

This is especially true if you focus on private-sector jobs. Overall employment in the Obama years has been held back by mass layoffs of schoolteachers and other state and local government employees. But private-sector employment has recovered almost all the ground lost in the administration's early months. That compares favorably with the Bush era: as of March 2004, private employment was still 2.4 million below its level when Bush took office.
...
But that's not the critique Romney is making. Instead, he's basically attacking Obama for not acting as if George Bush had been given a third term. Are the American people -- and perhaps more to the point, the news media -- forgetful enough for that attack to work? I guess we'll find out.

http://www.dailycamera.com/opinion-columnists/ci_20470664/krugman-amnesia-candidate


President Obama’s campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt responded to Mitt Romney’s victory speech on Tuesday by tying the Republican standard bearer to George W. Bush’s economic policies. His statement offers a good summary of how the Obama camp plans to frame the overall race as it heads into the general. Notice the lack of any “flip flop” attack on Romney, an angle that has been largely sidelined in recent days as the Obama camp has instead tried to emphasize Romney’s conservatism and wealthy background. From LaBolt:

“The title for Governor Romney’s speech tonight should have been Back to the Future, because he has proposed a return to the same policies that got us into the economic crisis in the first place – forcing the middle class to pay for tax cuts for millionaires and billionaires, letting Wall Street write its own rules, and eliminating investments in the security of the middle class. Despite all evidence to the contrary, Governor Romney believes that showering the wealthiest Americans with special giveaways will make the middle class thrive. We have tried those policies before. They didn’t unleash growth, they didn’t spur job creation and they didn’t boost the middle class. And while Mitt Romney praised those policies in 2004, they led to a recovery that produced seven times fewer private sector jobs than the President’s policies, despite a significantly milder recession compared to the one the President faced coming into office.

“This election will be a choice between two candidates, two records, and two visions for the country. The President brought the economy back from the brink of another Depression, bet on American workers to spur the comeback of the American auto industry and American manufacturing, kept his promise to end the war in Iraq and refocus on al Qaeda and fought every day to build an economy where hard work paid off and responsibility are rewarded. Governor Romney referred to himself as the ideal Tea Party candidate, and his policies earn him that title. He would stack the deck against the middle class, pull the rug out from under growing sectors of our economy like manufacturing and clean energy and promote giveaways to Americans who can afford to lobby for them.”

“Mitt Romney has spent the past year out on the campaign trail tearing down the President with a negative message that even Republicans who have endorsed him have criticized. This marks the end of that monologue. Now he must put his record and his agenda next to the President’s.”

http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/obama-spokesman-romney-vision-is-back-to-future


Democrats are PUSSIES! [View all] SmellyFeet Apr 2012 OP
They're even bigger pussies than my cats BeyondGeography Apr 2012 #1
Ummm.... physioex Apr 2012 #2
Since when? n/t SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #7
Since the place started up. Rex Apr 2012 #75
"what's new pussy cat?" is now "what's new, cat?" will "puppy" dog be banned next? nt msongs Apr 2012 #14
I have a feeling it won't matter one bit madokie Apr 2012 #3
You have probably already been alerted on snooper2 Apr 2012 #4
Uh, that word has multiple definitions. SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #11
Right you are. And the jury voted three/three to leave it. ohiosmith Apr 2012 #15
I've got an even more objectionable word that might get deleted! Kurovski Apr 2012 #57
Even so Shankapotomus Apr 2012 #130
OP used it as a noun. eom TransitJohn Apr 2012 #50
hmm, right you are! snooper2 Apr 2012 #55
wow, a whole 150 posts under your belt. Cojones: definition, see OP. rustydog Apr 2012 #5
Edit PLEASE before you get HID! Because we like your style!!! patrice Apr 2012 #6
I really don't care. n/t SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #8
+1 bahrbearian Apr 2012 #19
You are going to get in trouble but you make a good point. kenny blankenship Apr 2012 #9
Nope. Jury voted to let it stand. Rex Apr 2012 #20
Props for telling it like it is! Speck Tater Apr 2012 #10
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #13
I notice your last line, a "Democrat politician", not a democratic politician MiniMe Apr 2012 #12
Nice catch! Jury ruled 3-3 to leave the post. MineralMan Apr 2012 #16
Wow! n/t SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #26
I hope MIRT wins this one. ronnie624 Apr 2012 #153
How about it was an honest mistake. SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #17
Mathematically possible, but implications made in previous posts render that unlikely. LanternWaste Apr 2012 #36
Not so. Hearing impaired and deaf Democrats that I know Autumn Apr 2012 #134
DLC Democrats are complete pussies and totally worthless Downtown Hound Apr 2012 #18
Quelle surprise...this was left to stand, as well. n/t demmiblue Apr 2012 #71
Yeah, probably because it's true. n/t Downtown Hound Apr 2012 #74
Amazing. This usage is misogynistic on its face. MineralMan Apr 2012 #78
Men have so thoroughly fucked up the planet I say we bring back matriarchy, along coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #86
I'm more in favor of humanism, thanks. MineralMan Apr 2012 #87
me, too. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #88
Yeah, I hear you, MM. I cannot believe the jury allowed the OP to stand. Simply coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #91
Worse than that. It's been Recced right onto the Greatest Page! MineralMan Apr 2012 #92
Sad to have to say it, but I've seen a lot worse. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #111
Ha! I not only find it oh so very believable... redqueen Apr 2012 #97
i wasnt surprised. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #99
The word "pussies" is a vulgar reference to female coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #120
Brogressive site. Important distinction. redqueen Apr 2012 #122
Butbutbut... Capitalism! redqueen Apr 2012 #94
Interesting. I'm working on the content for a new website. MineralMan Apr 2012 #95
My recent conversion to radical feminism redqueen Apr 2012 #101
I'm not sure any of the other political/economic structures lead to anything different. MineralMan Apr 2012 #103
O-M-GOD. Are you serious? Dawgs Apr 2012 #96
You bet. The uterus is an incredibly strong MineralMan Apr 2012 #107
Woman are strong/Men are weak and small. Is that what you're trying to say? Dawgs Apr 2012 #117
No, I'm not trying to say that at all. MineralMan Apr 2012 #124
Sorry, but saying 'minuscule in size' when talking about male strength is slightly sexist. Dawgs Apr 2012 #126
I was talking about spermatazoa. They're microscopic. MineralMan Apr 2012 #138
Wow. A nice comment about fathers. Thanks. Dawgs Apr 2012 #139
I prefer th!e strength of my mind, but then I'm just a woman! sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #113
Don't belittle yourself with your mind... LanternWaste Apr 2012 #119
i am just reading too many of these posts and i have to stand up for man seabeyond Apr 2012 #121
Lol, yeah, I know. You learn something new on DU each and every day! sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #123
I imagine you would have us believe the same is not true of you? LanternWaste Apr 2012 #116
took you 156 posts to finally get that out? spanone Apr 2012 #21
Fuck this shit. Brickbat Apr 2012 #22
there is always the little boys that need slurs to feel all manly. sad, really. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #29
Don't I know it. Brickbat Apr 2012 #30
when you have the very men that need this to feel like men, voting, .... not much will be done seabeyond Apr 2012 #34
Agree, but using terms like little boys is just as offensive. n/t Dawgs Apr 2012 #54
women did nothing here. this "man" is the one acting like a little boy seabeyond Apr 2012 #58
Wow. "Pussies" as an insult, "cojones" as a synonym for courage... redqueen Apr 2012 #23
And there you have it. Right to the heart of the matter! MineralMan Apr 2012 #27
touche' rustydog Apr 2012 #32
As a woman, I prefer to choose those who presume to speak for me more carefully. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #114
Ha! n/t. SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #28
I really cannot believe this shit. Rex Apr 2012 #37
Seriously? This shit is practically routine here. nt redqueen Apr 2012 #44
That is the first 'freeper' comment I've seen allowed Rex Apr 2012 #61
+1 Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #38
+ a million. Thank you. emulatorloo Apr 2012 #80
I voted to hide the op. NCTraveler Apr 2012 #106
Ah, I see the Language Police is at it again. DutchLiberal Apr 2012 #141
Gosh, thank you ever so much for your advice. redqueen Apr 2012 #146
Actually, I've heard plenty of right-wingers madamesilverspurs Apr 2012 #24
Interesting, since I used Democratic in the first line and my whole message is how I hate the GOP. SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #31
Let me guess: ProSense Apr 2012 #41
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #42
get banned for misogynist behavior, by chance? nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #43
That actually happens? nt redqueen Apr 2012 #45
on occassion. more rare on du3 than du2. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #53
Really? ProSense Apr 2012 #46
Paul Krugman? This week? Obama spokesman? Yesterday? muriel_volestrangler Apr 2012 #25
Nope. Krugman is one of a very few, and the spokesman NOT ONCE uses the word Bush. SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #35
Thanks for setting the record straight emulatorloo Apr 2012 #39
+1 redqueen Apr 2012 #48
We know, but since M$M didn't cover those events, it never happened, you know? freshwest Apr 2012 #72
Well said. Republicans are promoted by the media. Dems are treated very differently. emulatorloo Apr 2012 #79
Nonsense. The Democatic party will crush the GOP in Rex Apr 2012 #33
You're really that confident that the Democrats will crush the GOP? SmellyFeet Apr 2012 #40
I was right before and I will be proven right again in this election. Rex Apr 2012 #52
No, these are. Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #47
Those are cupcakes. nt redqueen Apr 2012 #51
at least the d*** that started the thread wont be back in. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #49
How is what you said any better? n/t Dawgs Apr 2012 #56
Not only won't he be back into the thread, he's no longer part of DU. nt msanthrope Apr 2012 #59
good. thank you. now, how about that jury.... nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #66
Jury NCTraveler Apr 2012 #109
jury is pretty consistent in allowing sexist/misogynist comments. nt seabeyond Apr 2012 #112
Agree NCTraveler Apr 2012 #115
And Democratic Party bashing in general. Not about policies, but as a group deserving disdain. freshwest Apr 2012 #140
We should thank them redqueen Apr 2012 #63
Good... pinboy3niner Apr 2012 #70
Mr. Feet has been escorted from the building. MineralMan Apr 2012 #60
He is one of several low-post trolls I have been trying to tell people about. nt stevenleser Apr 2012 #68
It does finally catch up with them, though. MineralMan Apr 2012 #81
I reported him months ago with his very first post DevonRex Apr 2012 #93
Yep, we blocked him from the BOG at the time but it was clear he was here to disrupt. stevenleser Apr 2012 #105
Hmm. DevonRex Apr 2012 #110
Thanks. freshwest Apr 2012 #144
and so many duers on jury vote for this ass that is escorted out the door. women, seabeyond Apr 2012 #73
Reminds me of a certain well defended DUer who trolled the Feminists forum. redqueen Apr 2012 #77
The list of recommenders reads like a list of those who object to calls against offensive language stevenleser Apr 2012 #148
Thank you for your comments. freshwest Apr 2012 #143
So you're saying Democrats are tough? Fawke Em Apr 2012 #62
To think that some DUers recced this shite. demmiblue Apr 2012 #64
Thank goodness for transparency. MineralMan Apr 2012 #83
It's up to 8 DU Recs, now. MineralMan Apr 2012 #89
Do you mind not using sexist language Texasgal Apr 2012 #65
Posters gone - PPRd. Rex Apr 2012 #69
Thanks for speaking up Texasgal. I saw this after the ppr. Little Star Apr 2012 #76
Posting privledges revoked, eh? Not surprising. rl6214 Apr 2012 #67
Bush-the-Lesser has been airbrushed OUT of the American Portrait. bvar22 Apr 2012 #82
ridiculous and where the hell have you been? cali Apr 2012 #84
Maybe, but... Dawgs Apr 2012 #100
OH YEAH DainBramaged Apr 2012 #85
Congratulations, Reccers! This Thread is Now on the Greatest Page. MineralMan Apr 2012 #90
Ouch. Up to 10 now. n/t Dawgs Apr 2012 #98
I'm only seeing 9. Maybe someone clicked Undo. MineralMan Apr 2012 #104
It was my pleasure. DutchLiberal Apr 2012 #142
Exactly what I was thinking. Bush was a huge fuck up and they act like he was never in office. craigmatic Apr 2012 #102
Author of OP is PPR'd. Wonder what's going to happen to those who rec'd his post? Kaleva Apr 2012 #108
Nothing. MineralMan Apr 2012 #125
This is rich coming from you.... trumad Apr 2012 #128
Hi, trumad! MineralMan Apr 2012 #129
This message was self-deleted by its author trumad Apr 2012 #136
Great minds think alike! sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #132
Might as well ProSense Apr 2012 #118
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #127
You know you're going to get a lot of flak for using that word, don't you? Blue_In_AK Apr 2012 #131
Poster is PPRed. MineralMan Apr 2012 #135
Byeeeee.... SidDithers Apr 2012 #133
If they talk about the past they may have to make some arrest... unapatriciated Apr 2012 #137
Extra large pizza with a topping of dr scholl's odor eaters Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #145
This message was self-deleted by its author dmr Apr 2012 #147
i know you won't be, but you should be ashamed: Scout Apr 2012 #149
+1 redqueen Apr 2012 #152
Democrat politician? Seriously? leftynyc Apr 2012 #150
They're puppets. sendero Apr 2012 #151
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats are PUSSIES!»Reply #25