Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Romulox

(25,960 posts)
96. The trillions burned up in Iraq and Afghanistan haven't been "invested" in interest bearing accounts
Wed Apr 25, 2012, 11:03 AM
Apr 2012

That much should be obvious to everyone.

Great. And if Obama decided he wanted to redeem all those investments tomorrow, how would he? joeglow3 Apr 2012 #1
Your comment makes no sense. TheWraith Apr 2012 #3
You know the point I am making and are intentionally ignoring it. joeglow3 Apr 2012 #46
Apple, meet orange. Scuba Apr 2012 #79
Cop out joeglow3 Apr 2012 #82
No, I'm saying that your point is not a point at all. It's nonsense. TheWraith Apr 2012 #152
The Trustees don't control them Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #128
He doen't appear to be interested in his thread anymore. ronnie624 Apr 2012 #132
I only wish these 'investments' were called debt on the opposite side of the ledger lacrew Apr 2012 #37
"who pays this off? We the people." Not exactly. The money was borrowed from workers, HiPointDem Apr 2012 #39
So this will come from our non-existent income tax surplus? joeglow3 Apr 2012 #47
Interesting how you ignore what I said and change your argument. First it was that "we the people" HiPointDem Apr 2012 #50
I agree liberalmike27 Apr 2012 #64
I just responded to liberalmike27 Apr 2012 #52
The SS trust fund is not in "US treasury bonds". n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #2
Correct - if "is not" means "is". closeupready Apr 2012 #4
Um, yeah, it is. It's required to be by law. TheWraith Apr 2012 #5
Nope. The Social Security trust fund is not in "US Treasury Bonds"... PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #10
They're bonds... issued by the US treasury. TheWraith Apr 2012 #11
The 'legal protecton' issue is a red-herring. Since the securities are an internel-debt obligation PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #13
Congress could of course abolish Social Security. TheWraith Apr 2012 #19
Yep, the real problem is they don't want to pay the money back. bemildred Apr 2012 #6
Are you saying the government will have no financial difficulty redeeming the SS T Bonds? Fumesucker Apr 2012 #7
Assuming that we don't fuck up the debt limit, and/or crash the economy. TheWraith Apr 2012 #15
We can just print it. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #26
Bingo... sendero Apr 2012 #72
At what point do you foresee the budget being in decent shape? n/t Fumesucker Apr 2012 #51
Exactly, the SS trust fund is secure, now on to the next issue... hughee99 Apr 2012 #8
They still are pushing that meme on the MSM. I just saw one yesterday with the headline Cleita Apr 2012 #9
There's two problems with that headline. TheWraith Apr 2012 #12
Also, according to Bernie Sanders SS will still be able to pay 80% of benefits even Cleita Apr 2012 #14
Something like that. I believe the usual estimated number is 75%. TheWraith Apr 2012 #17
Let's just cut benefits by 25% NOW, then, so that seniors in 2033 can get what's been promised! Romulox Apr 2012 #89
By all means, continue acting silly and creating strawmen. nt TheWraith Apr 2012 #156
You forgot the third problem--the trust fund is SUPPOSED TO disappear eridani Apr 2012 #65
I heard that too and was surprised that it was put out there as fact. The Wielding Truth Apr 2012 #16
*Every penny* of the so-called "Trust Fund" has been spent. It's a fact that can't be ignored. Romulox Apr 2012 #18
I'm sorry, but you're completely wrong. TheWraith Apr 2012 #20
And your logic would land me, a CPA, in prison if I tried to pass that off as "accounting." joeglow3 Apr 2012 #48
Hogwash. Corporations lend between divisions and assets all the time, showing debt on one side HiPointDem Apr 2012 #69
Show me a company that pulls money out of a trust fund for retirees and spends the money. joeglow3 Apr 2012 #70
uh, all corporate retirement funds? HiPointDem Apr 2012 #71
You did not answer joeglow3 Apr 2012 #84
Plenty of pension funds are bondholders for their own company Recursion Apr 2012 #111
BS. The money "borrowed" is in T-Bills. Cleita Apr 2012 #21
That's factually incorrect. They are "special issues", not T-bills. They are not tradeable. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #41
They are very safe. The US government hasn't never, ever not paid up. Also, as another Cleita Apr 2012 #45
OK, but that doesn't contradict a thing I said. I didn't call for SS to be privatized, either. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #49
Not really. Kaleva Apr 2012 #22
No, this is also incorrect. Every dollar spent from the Trust Fund offset other potential borrowing Romulox Apr 2012 #42
Never said it reduces the national debt. Kaleva Apr 2012 #53
Intragovernmental borrowing is ultimately a wash, except for interest payments (which are below HiPointDem Apr 2012 #68
Agreed, but let's not lose sight of the underlying fact: the money has been SPENT. In Iraq. Romulox Apr 2012 #87
All of which are "investments" Recursion Apr 2012 #107
LOL at wars in Iraq, Afghanistan as "investments". Whats the ROI? Romulox Apr 2012 #129
Well, for instance, I was a Navy contractor for some of that time Recursion Apr 2012 #133
You have a real hard time with private vs. public debt/benefit. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #161
*Every penny* of your so-called "bank accounts" has been spent. MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #28
This isn't disagreeing with me...nt Romulox Apr 2012 #40
Correct. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #55
Bank of America's obligations (SHOULD'NT) be on the shoulders on unborn taxpayers. Romulox Apr 2012 #88
But they absolutely are Recursion Apr 2012 #94
No. Private businesses are typically capitalized by investors, not taxpayers. Banks are special, Romulox Apr 2012 #95
I didn't mean literal taxpayers, I meant depositors Recursion Apr 2012 #98
Well, I did *literally mean* taxpayers, since that's what this discussion is about. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #102
We have a sovereign currency. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #56
LOL. Then just give each of us a zillion-trillion-gazillion dollars of this "sovereign currency" Romulox Apr 2012 #85
Of course there would be other complications to drastically increasing the money supply. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #159
The same is true of 401(k) plans Recursion Apr 2012 #76
401ks are really a horrible example of long term fiscal dependability. Probably the worst you Romulox Apr 2012 #86
Any invested asset has been "spent". That's the point of investing it (nt) Recursion Apr 2012 #92
401ks are NOT guaranteed by future tax payers. They have little (or nothing) in common with SS. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #97
SS payments aren't guaranteed by future tax payers, either Recursion Apr 2012 #99
Snark removed: The future stream of payments to SS beneficiaries will be from future taxpayers. Romulox Apr 2012 #100
Well, no, presumably we'll borrow to retire the intragovernmental holdings Recursion Apr 2012 #101
An economic model based on the miracle of fish and loaves, then... Romulox Apr 2012 #103
The same people we borrow from now: it's called "the bond market" Recursion Apr 2012 #104
Um, this thread is about the so-called "Social Security Trust Fund". That's created from payroll Romulox Apr 2012 #105
*facepalm* Recursion Apr 2012 #108
Facepalm backatcha. SS has a structural deficit such that it cannot pay out scheduled benefits. Romulox Apr 2012 #110
How do you see any new debt being added? Recursion Apr 2012 #113
That's right, your arithmetic is too simplistic. You're talking about new borrowing, and Romulox Apr 2012 #120
They talk as if we're not already in debt to the tune of trillions of dollars ronnie624 Apr 2012 #124
In the same sense that every penny of the mortgage money my bank loaned me was spent. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #109
Except banks are private businesses who don't (normally) fund themselves via taxes. Romulox Apr 2012 #112
Different? Undoubtedly. Non sequitur? Absolutely. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #116
LOL at this: "Regardless of how the borrower will come up with the cash..." That's the rub, innit? Romulox Apr 2012 #131
You're essentially saying it's impossible to save money Recursion Apr 2012 #134
Spending money and saving money aren't the same thing. It's a silly argument. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #135
if you save in a bank or investment fund you're lending your money to someone to spend. HiPointDem Apr 2012 #136
"The money"? ALL money is debt. It's irrelevant what the government spent the loan proceeds on. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #145
I remember being surprised when I took a banking class... Recursion Apr 2012 #146
K&R for the truth /nt Dragonfli Apr 2012 #23
Hi, Wraith! bvar22 Apr 2012 #24
An argument to cut SS usually comes in two parts. pa28 Apr 2012 #25
Best coming to a logical conclusion argument that I have seen. Cleita Apr 2012 #31
Relax, this money can just be printed when it is needed to be paid out. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #27
Wow, got those talking points in twice in one thread Kingofalldems Apr 2012 #32
It's called reality. Ben will just fire up the presses. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #33
So your believe in a reality that Ben will be firing up the presses 21 years from now? n/t Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #35
LOL, hopefully not. Whoever is at the wheel at that point. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #36
I imagine many people subscribe to bumper stickers as their reality. LanternWaste Apr 2012 #91
So where do you think the money will come from? Be specific. nt Snake Alchemist Apr 2012 #93
OK, so you're saying Social Security is fine because we can always roll the printing presses Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #60
Kicked and recommended. Uncle Joe Apr 2012 #29
Rec. Right on MannyGoldstein Apr 2012 #30
can the trustee's sell the "US bonds" on the open market? alc Apr 2012 #34
They are included in government debt statistics. They are considered 'Intragovernmental Holdings' PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #38
Regardless of IOUs or T-bills... EdinGA Apr 2012 #43
People don't want to lift the income cap, because they don't want benefits means-tested. Romulox Apr 2012 #44
Bullshit. There is already "means testing" in the form of capped payouts eridani Apr 2012 #67
It's not my argument, so don't rail against me. Google previous DU discussions on the subject. Romulox Apr 2012 #90
Sorry--hard to keep the subthreads separate eridani Apr 2012 #153
Benefits are progressive. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #118
I agree with lifting the cap and means testing. Many do not. nt Romulox Apr 2012 #130
I agree with lifting the cap. I do not agree with means testing. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #144
+10000 n/t eridani Apr 2012 #154
If semantics get you there, I'm fine with that. Your suggestion would be right in line Romulox Apr 2012 #158
The Awful Truth About the Social Security Trust Fund allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #54
"the government does not have the money to repay the money it has "borrowed" or "stolen."" girl gone mad Apr 2012 #57
Technically liberalmike27 Apr 2012 #66
Are you seriously proposing the Federal government open a deposit account somewhere? Recursion Apr 2012 #106
I wrote myself an IOU for $2 million on a piece of paper, which I placed in a safe-deposit box. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #58
Question: girl gone mad Apr 2012 #62
I understand your point. We can roll the printing presses, so SS will always be fine. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #63
In my view, we shouldn't bother. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #73
One goes with the other it seems The2ndWheel Apr 2012 #81
I think we can meet our energy demands with proper investment. girl gone mad Apr 2012 #160
And since you have the ability to print your own money and issue your own debt... lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #121
Again, that's the "roll the printing presses" argument. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #123
Why? Because to do so devalues the existing money. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #143
Debt is debt, ronnie624 Apr 2012 #127
No it doesn't. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #142
We could just print the money tomorrow to pay off all US debt. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #150
Except for the fact that future lenders would take that into account, yes. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #155
Thanks for the interesting article ronnie624 Apr 2012 #163
And as soon as you become a sovereign nation, it will work for you, too. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #147
Because a sovereign nation can simply print the money it needs to pay benefits. Nye Bevan Apr 2012 #149
look at our newspaper this morning. spanone Apr 2012 #59
Thank you. It used to annoy the living shit out of me when I was down coalition_unwilling Apr 2012 #61
The Looting of Social Security allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #74
Thank you very much. ronnie624 Apr 2012 #77
Well said. It also means... Recursion Apr 2012 #75
Hello! This, exactly. n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #122
If most of the current and future taxpayer revenue ronnie624 Apr 2012 #78
It's not a fiction, but there are no assets which the government can use to pay benefits. Yo_Mama Apr 2012 #80
The government can and will use all that money being hoarded by the wealthy right now to pay. bemildred Apr 2012 #83
Government only has one asset: it's full faith and credit. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #114
I dunno. Ours has some pretty cool buildings. And the Interstate Highway system Recursion Apr 2012 #115
Who's going to repo it? n/t lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #119
The trillions burned up in Iraq and Afghanistan haven't been "invested" in interest bearing accounts Romulox Apr 2012 #96
Yep. ronnie624 Apr 2012 #117
The 1983 Social Security "Fix" allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #125
reagan didn't call the g-span commission to "raise money," he called it because the SS TF was HiPointDem Apr 2012 #137
I'm 45 years old. I don't expect to see a dime. Throd Apr 2012 #126
The Looting of Social Security: Pre-taxing the Baby Boomers allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #138
The trust fund has still never had a year in deficit. I'm so tired of that lie Recursion Apr 2012 #139
Either the government will have to take money from the general budget..." HiPointDem Apr 2012 #140
Err... the whole point of this was that it's easier to borrow Recursion Apr 2012 #148
The money has been squandered on things like the Internet and Pell Grants Recursion Apr 2012 #141
The So-called Trust Fund “Bonds” allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #151
The first year that benefits are not paid is the first year that "full faith and credit" dies. lumberjack_jeff Apr 2012 #157
The Looting of Social Security: The Code of Silence allenwsmithphd Apr 2012 #162
This message was self-deleted by its author Nye Bevan Sep 2013 #164
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Once again: The Social Se...»Reply #96