Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
And Darth, JR, et al, walk freely. K&R Mnemosyne Apr 2012 #1
We paid a million for Cheney's heart. EFerrari Apr 2012 #2
It can sure get discouraging at times, can't it?! Mnemosyne Apr 2012 #3
Maybe if we can hold the truth, we can do the rest of it, too. EFerrari Apr 2012 #10
About this, I am pleased. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #4
And the twitter universe is largely overlooking this: Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #5
Because it's not important. msanthrope Apr 2012 #6
Downloaded crap FROM Julian? What does that even mean? Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #7
I suggest you read the charges...and understand that Mr. Manning is charged, specifically, msanthrope Apr 2012 #9
Oh, I've read the charges. They do not mention Assange or Wikileaks. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #11
The Article 32 did, as sufficiency to the elements of the crimes msanthrope Apr 2012 #12
Please post the text of the specific CHARGES against Manning that refer to Assange or Wikileaks Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #13
As I have suggested to you, if you read the charges, and follow along the specifics proved to the msanthrope Apr 2012 #14
Ahahaha! Nice. Because you can't. Because neither are mentioned in the charges. Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #15
Well, no. Neither is Al Qaeda, and yet, Mr. Manning is charged with aiding them. msanthrope Apr 2012 #16
Your words: "Mr. Manning is charged, specifically...with getting software from Assange Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #17
As I've suggested, understanding crim pro a little better might msanthrope Apr 2012 #18
So Manning isn't going to trial until the Fall, then, based on defense motions.... msanthrope Apr 2012 #8
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Manning Case: 'Judge Orde...»Reply #4