Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: U.S. skies to be full of drones [View all]bvar22
(39,909 posts)24. Gee, I don't know...
...might have something to do with THIS:
"
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
United States v. Jones, 565 U. S. ____ (2012),
the Supreme Court ruled that a search for Fourth Amendment purposes also occurs when law enforcement trespasses on a person's property for information gathering purposes, even if that person had no reasonable expectation of privacy.
the Supreme Court ruled that a search for Fourth Amendment purposes also occurs when law enforcement trespasses on a person's property for information gathering purposes, even if that person had no reasonable expectation of privacy.
I would consider a drone peeking my windows as a violation of this.
It never ceases to amaze me how quickly people on a "Liberal" Site are so willing to give away their Constitutional Protections,
AND trust the government NOT to abuse it.
I don't just say "NO",
but "HELL NO!!!
You will know them by their WORKS,
not by their excuses.
[font size=5 color=green]Solidarity99![/font][font size=2 color=green]
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------[/center]
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
the cynic in me almost wishes I owned the company that builds those nightmares...
Blue_Tires
Apr 2012
#1
There is nothing inherently military about a remote control aircraft with a camera...
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#21
FROM THE U.K. FUCKING TELEGRAPH!! That's worse!! They knowingly let their pieces get republished by
TransitJohn
Apr 2012
#42
"Dogtown" to be monitored by drones? really? As they say in L'Rock...thad ain't raht!
HereSince1628
Apr 2012
#11
if you don't think that the friendly folks at the Tehran Times aren't looking out for your best
dionysus
Apr 2012
#17
The story is actually from the Daily Telegraph in the UK, not the Tehran Times.....
marmar
Apr 2012
#22
Here's an US media source (which of course we can always believe, for your 90 sarcasms)
sad sally
Apr 2012
#18
I already have a method for dealing with them and the black helicopters which keep circling my home
Major Nikon
Apr 2012
#25