Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
47. The Ever-Expanding Surveillance State That Has Grown Under Obama
Fri Apr 20, 2012, 10:29 PM
Apr 2012

The Ever-Expanding Surveillance State That Has Grown Under Obama
By: Kevin Gosztola
April 20, 2012


The surveillance state in the United States has only grown in America since the September 11th attacks. It has increasingly been used to spy and intrude on the lives of journalists and activists. And, during a Democracy Now! special, a full hour was spent delving into the National Security Agency’s evolution into an entity that illegally collects and sifts through private emails, cell phone calls and possibly Internet searches and other personal data of Americans. The special also looked closely at the stories of two individuals that have been targeted by the Homeland Security Department—journalist Laura Poitras, who has directed documentaries on the Iraq War and Yemen, and computer security researcher Jacob Appelbaum, who once served as a stand-in for Julian Assange at a hackers conference.

NSA whistleblower William Binney, in his first television interview since he resigned from the NSA, explains that the fact a telecommunications company, AT&T, was now providing approximately 320 million records—long distance data from citizens’ billing records—to the government led him to leave the agency. This was a violation of the Constitution, the pen register law, the Stored Communications Act, the Electronic Privacy Act, the Intelligence Acts of 1947 & 1978 and other federal laws governing telecommunications.

Binney talks about going to the Intelligence Committee to raise concern before he resigned. Porter Goss, who was chairman of the committee at the time, essentially shrugged off an effort to look into what the NSA was doing. He thought any questions should be taken to Michael Hayden, then-head of the NSA. It was the Intelligence Committee’s job to “do the oversight on all this domestic spying.” The Committee was setup to provide “oversight over the intelligence community to make sure they didn’t monitor US citizens.” It was setup in the “fallout of the Church Committee back in the 70s.” But, nothing was really being done about the illegal operations of the NSA.

And then, on July 26, 2007, about twelve FBI agents raided his home with their guns drawn. Binney was in the shower. His son answered the door. They pushed past him and, when they found him in the bathroom, pointed a gun at his head to make sure he was “duly intimidated.” Diane Roark, Kirk Wiebe and Ed Loomis were also raided that same day too. This was intimidation and retribution for filing a Defense Department Inspector General complaint against the NSA.

Read the full article at:

http://dissenter.firedoglake.com/2012/04/20/the-ever-expanding-surveillance-state-that-has-grown-under-obama/

Some truth there. Autumn Apr 2012 #1
This was ProSense Apr 2012 #2
"Failed to hold those responsible for past torture and other cruelty accountable; has blocked Dragonfli Apr 2012 #12
Please do ProSense Apr 2012 #14
I think that is good advice, so please feel free to get over yourself as well Dragonfli Apr 2012 #18
Clearly ProSense Apr 2012 #21
The difference is, I stopped drinking kool-aid and started listening to my reason Dragonfli Apr 2012 #23
Hear, hear...nt SidDithers Apr 2012 #24
. Dragonfli Apr 2012 #25
To be fair, Clinton didn't do those things, they were done by Repubs. Sirveri Apr 2012 #48
To be fair he did support all three of those things and rallied blue dog votes to help Dragonfli Apr 2012 #49
That's a fair point. I'm used to arguing with Repubs about it. Sirveri Apr 2012 #50
Understandable, the Republicans like to take credit for the balanced budget as well Dragonfli Apr 2012 #51
Hear, hear. nt woo me with science Apr 2012 #15
This was also progressoid Apr 2012 #27
So was ProSense Apr 2012 #28
Oh, I'm sorry. progressoid Apr 2012 #29
Please ProSense Apr 2012 #3
Du rec. Nt xchrom Apr 2012 #4
du wreck indeed Whisp Apr 2012 #5
No comment. MineralMan Apr 2012 #6
This was posted yesterday Capt. Obvious Apr 2012 #7
i missed it..some of us dont get here everyday..rec because the truth is good enough xiamiam Apr 2012 #8
Well, carry on then Capt. Obvious Apr 2012 #10
Good. woo me with science Apr 2012 #11
I am having deja true! Kick for the truth! Dragonfli Apr 2012 #13
I didn't see it but glad to hear that! Better Believe It Apr 2012 #16
DU rec. Thanks for continuing to push against the denial. woo me with science Apr 2012 #9
One party, two faces - one friendlier looking than the other... polichick Apr 2012 #57
tell me, do you ever post anything about Romney or is it just Obama you can't stand? WI_DEM Apr 2012 #17
You mean like this anti-Romney one I posted yesterday? Better Believe It Apr 2012 #20
yeah, yeah, etc.... Bobbie Jo Apr 2012 #30
It is bipartisan. Wake up and look at the fucking record. woo me with science Apr 2012 #22
La, La, La, La, La, La... I can't hear you La, La, La, La, La hughee99 Apr 2012 #19
True enough, but do you think Mittens will be any better? truebrit71 Apr 2012 #26
No. He might build on Obama's actions just as Obama built on Dubya's. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #31
Right ProSense Apr 2012 #32
Sorry ProSense but picking up many Obama policies IS the same as picking up from Bush... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #35
Sorry, ProSense Apr 2012 #40
And I disagree... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #42
Right, ProSense Apr 2012 #43
We know, you do it all the time. TransitJohn Apr 2012 #64
How has it been going? Up to this point it's been an abject failure... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #34
You're right. Obama might change, especially since he wouldn't be up for re-election in 2016. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #39
As an aside (not meant to distract from, or discourage an answer from the poster you replied to) Dragonfli Apr 2012 #41
There is no need to apologize. Better Believe It Apr 2012 #46
Prediction: "Grand Bargain" will be the buzzword again after November. Marr Apr 2012 #52
I agree we have a better chance of convincing President Obama that is Constitution is worth sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #33
+, well said Sabrina /nt Dragonfli Apr 2012 #38
Democrats need to represent a stark difference from Republicans... polichick Apr 2012 #54
I think they used to, before reagan. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #65
Disposing of our civil liberties is for our own good. Didn't you get the memo from the DNC/RNC? Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2012 #36
Kick, we need to make civil liberties a campaign issue if we are to influence our candidate Dragonfli Apr 2012 #37
K&R DisabledDem Apr 2012 #44
DURec, bvar22 Apr 2012 #45
The Ever-Expanding Surveillance State That Has Grown Under Obama Better Believe It Apr 2012 #47
keep trying... dionysus Apr 2012 #53
It's horrifying and inexplicable. polichick Apr 2012 #55
Another cut and paste drive by. cliffordu Apr 2012 #56
Ctrl-V for Victory!!... SidDithers Apr 2012 #58
rofl cliffordu Apr 2012 #60
A victory for blind denial is hardly to be celebrated. polichick Apr 2012 #61
Interesting that you cannot dispute the facts presented... polichick Apr 2012 #59
It's easier to just do what the Bushies used to do. Marr Apr 2012 #62
Good point - but kinda creepy to see that here. polichick Apr 2012 #63
Oh... The Marchers Here Have Been Practicing... And They Are Almost In Lock-Step... WillyT Apr 2012 #66
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Obama Became a Civil ...»Reply #47