Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
27. You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims
Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:18 PM
Apr 2012

before. If you wish, I shall do so again.

Are you admitting that you now have enough information about Mr Awlaki that you retract the claim that he was "non-violent?"

Because they know they Nugent Drale Apr 2012 #1
I don't think he drinks RZM Apr 2012 #3
Yes, he is substance free but he is brain damaged Motown_Johnny Apr 2012 #21
My take is more that he's just an attention-whore RZM Apr 2012 #22
But alcohol isn't a drug - - it's legal! Taverner Apr 2012 #43
Stupid op. They could arrest Nugent anytime they Solomon Apr 2012 #39
Pedo Ted isn't in al-queda. MrSlayer Apr 2012 #2
Pedo Ted? Zalatix Apr 2012 #6
Yes, he of the underage girl fetish.... MrSlayer Apr 2012 #11
Oh, hell no. Send in the drones. Zalatix Apr 2012 #12
Are you arguing that a drone should be sent after him? RZM Apr 2012 #4
We already set a bad precedent by killing unarmed US citizens without a trial. Zalatix Apr 2012 #5
My fifth grade rival said the same thing RZM Apr 2012 #7
I think it's pretty well known he talks shit, polly7 Apr 2012 #9
Native Americans will point out that precedent was set over a century ago WonderGrunion Apr 2012 #32
We don't know that they were terrorists any more clearly that we know that Ted Nugent is a terrorist sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #10
And THAT is my entire point, right there. Zalatix Apr 2012 #13
Respectfully,*You* may not know that Al-Awlaki is a terrorist. That is not a viewpoint widely msanthrope Apr 2012 #16
And yet, there has been no evidence produced of this violence. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #17
Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT? msanthrope Apr 2012 #18
Absolutely! Who cares about that silly 6th Amendment. Bush eviscerated the 4th... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #19
Seriously? The 6th doesn't apply to a fugitive--one cannot both flee and plead one's rights. msanthrope Apr 2012 #20
I think we've had this discussion of the thoroughly corrupt Yemeni court system... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #24
If the Yemeni system was so corrupt, why did Awlaki choose residency in Yemen? msanthrope Apr 2012 #25
In regards to Bates: No he didn't. That case was not about Al-Awlaki's rights. It was about Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #29
If you read the decision, Judge Bates spends quite a bit of his 83-page decision outling Awlaki's msanthrope Apr 2012 #37
Neither Yemeni court nor UK court are US jurisdictions. morningfog Apr 2012 #36
And? What is your point? A non-custodial enemy combatant can be pursued msanthrope Apr 2012 #40
You were talking about his trial. Where he was tried is irrelevant if not in US. morningfog Apr 2012 #45
What does a Yemeni charge have to do with the US? sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #44
Since I do not know whether or not he was violent, you might want to sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #23
You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims msanthrope Apr 2012 #27
I have stated the fact that, until the recent claims, all he was sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #30
So you continue to claim that the emails between him an the BA bomber were, what? Faked??? msanthrope Apr 2012 #34
What were the charges against Al Awlaki? sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #41
Yeah, we also had "evidence" that Saddam Hussein had nukes aimed at us. Zalatix Apr 2012 #28
Are you stating that a massive conspiracy exists that falsely links Mr. Awlaki to msanthrope Apr 2012 #35
Two words: Saddam Hussein. It's happened before. Zalatix Apr 2012 #42
Wango Z Tango? Rex Apr 2012 #8
LOL he won't lack for iron in his diet. Zalatix Apr 2012 #15
Maybe they tried. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #14
How do we know they aren't sending drones after him? Isn't this a "secret" program? mulsh Apr 2012 #26
Will a Drone chase a Drone? Hubert Flottz Apr 2012 #31
Because he would like it too much? quaker bill Apr 2012 #33
umm ... Because they have direct and easy law enforcement access to Ted. JoePhilly Apr 2012 #38
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»So why aren't they sendin...»Reply #27