Reply #27

In the discussion thread: So why aren't they sending the drones after Ted Nugent? [View all]

Thu Apr 19, 2012, 10:18 PM

msanthrope (16,474 posts)

27. You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims

before. If you wish, I shall do so again.

Are you admitting that you now have enough information about Mr Awlaki that you retract the claim that he was "non-violent?"

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

45 replies	Author	Time	Post
So why aren't they sending the drones after Ted Nugent? [View all]	Zalatix	Apr 2012	OP
Because they know they Nugent	Drale	Apr 2012	#1
I don't think he drinks	RZM	Apr 2012	#3
Yes, he is substance free but he is brain damaged	Motown_Johnny	Apr 2012	#21
My take is more that he's just an attention-whore	RZM	Apr 2012	#22
But alcohol isn't a drug - - it's legal!	Taverner	Apr 2012	#43
Stupid op. They could arrest Nugent anytime they	Solomon	Apr 2012	#39
Pedo Ted isn't in al-queda.	MrSlayer	Apr 2012	#2
Pedo Ted?	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#6
Yes, he of the underage girl fetish....	MrSlayer	Apr 2012	#11
Oh, hell no. Send in the drones.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#12
Are you arguing that a drone should be sent after him?	RZM	Apr 2012	#4
We already set a bad precedent by killing unarmed US citizens without a trial.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#5
My fifth grade rival said the same thing	RZM	Apr 2012	#7
I think it's pretty well known he talks shit,	polly7	Apr 2012	#9
Native Americans will point out that precedent was set over a century ago	WonderGrunion	Apr 2012	#32
We don't know that they were terrorists any more clearly that we know that Ted Nugent is a terrorist	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#10
And THAT is my entire point, right there.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#13
Respectfully,You may not know that Al-Awlaki is a terrorist. That is not a viewpoint widely	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#16
And yet, there has been no evidence produced of this violence.	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#17
Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT?	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#18
Absolutely! Who cares about that silly 6th Amendment. Bush eviscerated the 4th...	Luminous Animal	Apr 2012	#19
Seriously? The 6th doesn't apply to a fugitive--one cannot both flee and plead one's rights.	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#20
I think we've had this discussion of the thoroughly corrupt Yemeni court system...	Luminous Animal	Apr 2012	#24
If the Yemeni system was so corrupt, why did Awlaki choose residency in Yemen?	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#25
In regards to Bates: No he didn't. That case was not about Al-Awlaki's rights. It was about	Luminous Animal	Apr 2012	#29
If you read the decision, Judge Bates spends quite a bit of his 83-page decision outling Awlaki's	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#37
Neither Yemeni court nor UK court are US jurisdictions.	morningfog	Apr 2012	#36
And? What is your point? A non-custodial enemy combatant can be pursued	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#40
You were talking about his trial. Where he was tried is irrelevant if not in US.	morningfog	Apr 2012	#45
What does a Yemeni charge have to do with the US?	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#44
Since I do not know whether or not he was violent, you might want to	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#23
You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#27
I have stated the fact that, until the recent claims, all he was	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#30
So you continue to claim that the emails between him an the BA bomber were, what? Faked???	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#34
What were the charges against Al Awlaki?	sabrina 1	Apr 2012	#41
Yeah, we also had "evidence" that Saddam Hussein had nukes aimed at us.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#28
Are you stating that a massive conspiracy exists that falsely links Mr. Awlaki to	msanthrope	Apr 2012	#35
Two words: Saddam Hussein. It's happened before.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#42
Wango Z Tango?	Rex	Apr 2012	#8
LOL he won't lack for iron in his diet.	Zalatix	Apr 2012	#15
Maybe they tried.	Lizzie Poppet	Apr 2012	#14
How do we know they aren't sending drones after him? Isn't this a "secret" program?	mulsh	Apr 2012	#26
Will a Drone chase a Drone?	Hubert Flottz	Apr 2012	#31
Because he would like it too much?	quaker bill	Apr 2012	#33
umm ... Because they have direct and easy law enforcement access to Ted.	JoePhilly	Apr 2012	#38

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.