General Discussion

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)

18. Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT?

Thu Apr 19, 2012, 05:32 PM

Apr 2012

For Mr. Awlaki to be the non-violent cleric you claim he is, all these things must be fabricated----

And the testimony in Rajib Karim's trial? Faked. Someone else was in contact with him via email...he'd never plot to blow up a BA airliner.

The allocution of the Christmas underwear bomber? A lie, obviously. Awlaki would never try to blow up a plane.

Fort Hood? Obviously the shooter was in contact with someone other than Awlaki. Those 18 emails betweeb Hasan and Awlaki were faked.

Molly Norris was threatened with death by someone else. That cartoonist was obviously faking it.

Stephen Timms? Awlaki's not to blame for his stabbing.

Times Square??? Awlaki's not to blame for his contacts with the bomber.

The PETN bombs? Pure coincidence that they came from AQAP.

Obviously, the UN is in on the slander, too...including him in Resolution 1267's AQ list is evidence of a nefarious plot against him.

So, tell us all about the conspiracy against Mr. Awlaki....who is behind it all????

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

45 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

So why aren't they sending the drones after Ted Nugent? [View all] Zalatix Apr 2012 OP

Because they know they Nugent Drale Apr 2012 #1

I don't think he drinks RZM Apr 2012 #3

Yes, he is substance free but he is brain damaged Motown_Johnny Apr 2012 #21

My take is more that he's just an attention-whore RZM Apr 2012 #22

But alcohol isn't a drug - - it's legal! Taverner Apr 2012 #43

Stupid op. They could arrest Nugent anytime they Solomon Apr 2012 #39

Pedo Ted isn't in al-queda. MrSlayer Apr 2012 #2

Pedo Ted? Zalatix Apr 2012 #6

Yes, he of the underage girl fetish.... MrSlayer Apr 2012 #11

Oh, hell no. Send in the drones. Zalatix Apr 2012 #12

Are you arguing that a drone should be sent after him? RZM Apr 2012 #4

We already set a bad precedent by killing unarmed US citizens without a trial. Zalatix Apr 2012 #5

My fifth grade rival said the same thing RZM Apr 2012 #7

I think it's pretty well known he talks shit, polly7 Apr 2012 #9

Native Americans will point out that precedent was set over a century ago WonderGrunion Apr 2012 #32

We don't know that they were terrorists any more clearly that we know that Ted Nugent is a terrorist sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #10

And THAT is my entire point, right there. Zalatix Apr 2012 #13

Respectfully,*You* may not know that Al-Awlaki is a terrorist. That is not a viewpoint widely msanthrope Apr 2012 #16

And yet, there has been no evidence produced of this violence. sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #17

Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT? msanthrope Apr 2012 #18

Absolutely! Who cares about that silly 6th Amendment. Bush eviscerated the 4th... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #19

Seriously? The 6th doesn't apply to a fugitive--one cannot both flee and plead one's rights. msanthrope Apr 2012 #20

I think we've had this discussion of the thoroughly corrupt Yemeni court system... Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #24

If the Yemeni system was so corrupt, why did Awlaki choose residency in Yemen? msanthrope Apr 2012 #25

In regards to Bates: No he didn't. That case was not about Al-Awlaki's rights. It was about Luminous Animal Apr 2012 #29

If you read the decision, Judge Bates spends quite a bit of his 83-page decision outling Awlaki's msanthrope Apr 2012 #37

Neither Yemeni court nor UK court are US jurisdictions. morningfog Apr 2012 #36

And? What is your point? A non-custodial enemy combatant can be pursued msanthrope Apr 2012 #40

You were talking about his trial. Where he was tried is irrelevant if not in US. morningfog Apr 2012 #45

What does a Yemeni charge have to do with the US? sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #44

Since I do not know whether or not he was violent, you might want to sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #23

You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims msanthrope Apr 2012 #27

I have stated the fact that, until the recent claims, all he was sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #30

So you continue to claim that the emails between him an the BA bomber were, what? Faked??? msanthrope Apr 2012 #34

What were the charges against Al Awlaki? sabrina 1 Apr 2012 #41

Yeah, we also had "evidence" that Saddam Hussein had nukes aimed at us. Zalatix Apr 2012 #28

Are you stating that a massive conspiracy exists that falsely links Mr. Awlaki to msanthrope Apr 2012 #35

Two words: Saddam Hussein. It's happened before. Zalatix Apr 2012 #42

Wango Z Tango? Rex Apr 2012 #8

LOL he won't lack for iron in his diet. Zalatix Apr 2012 #15

Maybe they tried. Lizzie Poppet Apr 2012 #14

How do we know they aren't sending drones after him? Isn't this a "secret" program? mulsh Apr 2012 #26

Will a Drone chase a Drone? Hubert Flottz Apr 2012 #31

Because he would like it too much? quaker bill Apr 2012 #33

umm ... Because they have direct and easy law enforcement access to Ted. JoePhilly Apr 2012 #38