Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So why aren't they sending the drones after Ted Nugent? [View all]msanthrope
(37,549 posts)18. Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT?
For Mr. Awlaki to be the non-violent cleric you claim he is, all these things must be fabricated----
And the testimony in Rajib Karim's trial? Faked. Someone else was in contact with him via email...he'd never plot to blow up a BA airliner.
The allocution of the Christmas underwear bomber? A lie, obviously. Awlaki would never try to blow up a plane.
Fort Hood? Obviously the shooter was in contact with someone other than Awlaki. Those 18 emails betweeb Hasan and Awlaki were faked.
Molly Norris was threatened with death by someone else. That cartoonist was obviously faking it.
Stephen Timms? Awlaki's not to blame for his stabbing.
Times Square??? Awlaki's not to blame for his contacts with the bomber.
The PETN bombs? Pure coincidence that they came from AQAP.
Obviously, the UN is in on the slander, too...including him in Resolution 1267's AQ list is evidence of a nefarious plot against him.
So, tell us all about the conspiracy against Mr. Awlaki....who is behind it all????
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Native Americans will point out that precedent was set over a century ago
WonderGrunion
Apr 2012
#32
We don't know that they were terrorists any more clearly that we know that Ted Nugent is a terrorist
sabrina 1
Apr 2012
#10
Respectfully,*You* may not know that Al-Awlaki is a terrorist. That is not a viewpoint widely
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#16
Plenty of evidence, but you reject it all. Do you think it is all lies and fabrications? CT?
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#18
Absolutely! Who cares about that silly 6th Amendment. Bush eviscerated the 4th...
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#19
Seriously? The 6th doesn't apply to a fugitive--one cannot both flee and plead one's rights.
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#20
I think we've had this discussion of the thoroughly corrupt Yemeni court system...
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#24
If the Yemeni system was so corrupt, why did Awlaki choose residency in Yemen?
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#25
In regards to Bates: No he didn't. That case was not about Al-Awlaki's rights. It was about
Luminous Animal
Apr 2012
#29
If you read the decision, Judge Bates spends quite a bit of his 83-page decision outling Awlaki's
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#37
You were talking about his trial. Where he was tried is irrelevant if not in US.
morningfog
Apr 2012
#45
You have specifically claimed that he was "non-violent." I've linked to your claims
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#27
So you continue to claim that the emails between him an the BA bomber were, what? Faked???
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#34
Are you stating that a massive conspiracy exists that falsely links Mr. Awlaki to
msanthrope
Apr 2012
#35