Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: About the idea of handcuffing six year olds [View all]Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)62. Handcuffing children is abusive, you will never convince me otherwise, All that advocate such abuse
will now be on my ignore list so you will not have to be reminded of what such treatment actually is.
You will hence forth be free to advocate whatever medieval "discipline" of other peoples children you wish without me calling the kettle black in such a blasphemous fashion as I will not even see your "views" on tough love and police punishment for kinder gardeners.
Have fun hoss, I will hence forth only protect the weak in the real world. You and your "tough on child crime" friends will be completely invisible to me now and will be free to discuss how cool this stuff is without my criticism.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
90 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I still stand with both the cops and the school on this. My belief is they handled
teddy51
Apr 2012
#1
Read post #2 for what could happen to school officials if they were required to restrain
teddy51
Apr 2012
#4
But my question still is, why should this school be required to deal with students like this?
teddy51
Apr 2012
#10
No kidding... That should scare the crap out of parents with children that do not have behavioral
teddy51
Apr 2012
#14
Agreed, and the fact that she became a problem that the school officials felt that they couldn't
teddy51
Apr 2012
#32
There's not enough information in the article to answer those questions.
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#43
Why? Because her attendance disrupts other kids in the class and probably frightens the hell out
teddy51
Apr 2012
#41
I disagree, this is just a school and a school that probably has had the crap kicked out of both
teddy51
Apr 2012
#47
You are saying it is not illegal, that doesnt mean you cannot be sued for doing it. nt
stevenleser
Apr 2012
#81
I have learned a great deal from that thread, mainly that there is a great deal of animosity
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#29
Diplomacy has never been my strong suit, but hurt feelings and thin skin drive
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#42
Since the teachers are not allowed to physically touch the kids, I believe its a good idea Stinky
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#2
There are a few recent cases of little bitty Florida students being hauled off by the cops
Yo_Mama
Apr 2012
#15
This girl is 6. It is likely her first year in school. When I was a kid in NYC 30+ years ago
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#50
Its true at my school in IL. Its true in my sister's schools in other IL districts, and CA as well.
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#33
The question becomes, are Educators required to deal with what I see as a dangerous student?
teddy51
Apr 2012
#7
I might agree, but it seems clear that she has some issues that need to be dealt with.
teddy51
Apr 2012
#23
"Because if you can't control a kindergarten student throwing a temper tantrum without calling the
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#48
I'm old school...I believe teachers/school security stand "in locus parentis"
HereSince1628
Apr 2012
#11
There are no winners here. And what is the alternative to trained cops?
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2012
#35
These situations will continue to come up, so what's needed are ways to deal with them when they do
Stinky The Clown
Apr 2012
#80
Careful FH, I was roundly attacked and had a barrage of posts hidden for attempting to stand up for
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#38
Baloney. Your posts were hidden because you engaged in personal attacks.
proud2BlibKansan
Apr 2012
#53
Thank you but I no longer post on AOL and will no longer be baited. I think you do not understand
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#54
1. I've worked with young children for 3 decades so yes, I do know how easily they can be hurt
proud2BlibKansan
Apr 2012
#55
I guess I "broke the rules" because I really believe that small children should be
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#56
Bullshit! ProudKansan isn't advocating abuse. at. all. That's an ugly smear.
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#57
Handcuffing children is abusive, you will never convince me otherwise, All that advocate such abuse
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#62
My "ignores" on my transparency page are still unchanged. Can you PLEASE put me on ignore already??!
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#67
That depends, do you also advocate handcuffing children and consider it to not be abusive?
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#71
No, I can't seem to get on board with the new normal of handcuffs for children, by the way
Dragonfli
Apr 2012
#63
But we need to give more tax cuts to the wealthy job creators. Fuck the schools.
madinmaryland
Apr 2012
#34
Yeah well, other "advice" has consisted of locking the kid in a closet until the parents arrive,
riderinthestorm
Apr 2012
#69
So each school should have a couple pairs of leather wrist restraints and the problem is solved
FarCenter
Apr 2012
#75
Sure, we'll just pay for Officer Friendly by cutting art and music or some other program that...
JVS
Apr 2012
#83