Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

former9thward

(31,964 posts)

7. This is not a congressional issue.

Reply to cthulu2016 (Reply #2)

Fri Apr 13, 2012, 12:20 PM

Apr 2012

This is a state law. That is why it was before the CA Supreme court instead of federal court.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

California court says employers don't have to assure workers of lunch break. [View all] Skidmore Apr 2012 OP

... xchrom Apr 2012 #1

That headline does not convey the story cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #2

When I worked as a secretary for a Corporation, HockeyMom Apr 2012 #4

I doubt it cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #9

That was my thinking as well: this doesn't prevent people from taking lunch breaks arcane1 Apr 2012 #6

This is not a congressional issue. former9thward Apr 2012 #7

My bad cthulu2016 Apr 2012 #11

Are these fucking people crazy malaise Apr 2012 #3

There you have it - we officially live in the Matrix. Initech Apr 2012 #5

I think I'm perfectly capable of deciding WeekendWarrior Apr 2012 #8

Force being the operative word here liberal N proud Apr 2012 #10

I hate taking lunch breaks. I don't eat lunch. Lionessa Apr 2012 #13

Employers can easily direct their workers to stop work at an assigned time for a "lunch break". Better Believe It Apr 2012 #12

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»California court says emp...»Reply #7