Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MoonRiver

(36,926 posts)
9. Exactly my point,
Fri Apr 13, 2012, 12:20 PM
Apr 2012

"This has been hijacked by the Republicans."

I've worked my entire life (now retired), sometimes part time while I raised kids, sometimes full time. I've never had the luxury of not working, plus I am highly educated and wanted to use my professional skills. Yet I don't begrudge women who can and choose to stay at home with the kids. I don't even begrudge the very rich their wealth. Many progressives are rich. It's how people use their wealth and positions of power that matter.

Just a bit of comic relief MrYikes Apr 2012 #1
If she's supposed to be some sort of economic expert, it does. sadbear Apr 2012 #2
Why, she could have worked for 100 years for a paycheck hughee99 Apr 2012 #26
But not working a single day totally makes her unqualified to be an economic expert. sadbear Apr 2012 #32
define work... n/t ProdigalJunkMail Apr 2012 #35
What matters is that Republican policies take choices away from women... polichick Apr 2012 #3
In this clip she says "we need to respect the choices that women make" Voice for Peace Apr 2012 #19
I heard that on the radio today and thought the same thing... polichick Apr 2012 #33
Yes it does atreides1 Apr 2012 #4
Granted, but you do understand how this argument is being spun by Repugs. MoonRiver Apr 2012 #5
You mean, the 1% Moms? Who Gives a.... Demeter Apr 2012 #16
we are not one percenters... ProdigalJunkMail Apr 2012 #24
So did I, when they were too young for school Demeter Apr 2012 #30
we are not one percenters... ProdigalJunkMail Apr 2012 #31
There's been a lot of RNC chatter about "using" Ann Romney to try to woo back the women's vote riderinthestorm Apr 2012 #6
It matters more that her marrying a rich guy gives her the luxury NOT to have to work for a paycheck meow2u3 Apr 2012 #7
Let alone the "Luxury" of 5 kids Demeter Apr 2012 #17
No -- it matters that she had the choice of whether to work outside the home for a paycheck or gateley Apr 2012 #8
Exactly my point, MoonRiver Apr 2012 #9
Bingo - That response was what I was expecting! mazzarro Apr 2012 #13
+1 uponit7771 Apr 2012 #29
Insofar as it keeps the class war front and center, yes. n/t Egalitarian Thug Apr 2012 #10
When she talks as if she'd had it tough, YEAH, it does. aquart Apr 2012 #11
Or worked, period? Cleita Apr 2012 #12
Since she is speaking to the economic concerns of mothers, it Roselma Apr 2012 #14
+1000 abelenkpe Apr 2012 #18
People who Stray Outside Their Areas of Expertise DESERVE Everything Coming to Them Demeter Apr 2012 #15
Nope, she's not running for anything The Second Stone Apr 2012 #20
Actually, I do not care one way or the other because I will not be voting for Romney. RebelOne Apr 2012 #21
I think so too. MoonRiver Apr 2012 #23
It matters to me and here's precisely why: She purports to be speaking for women cali Apr 2012 #22
It only matters if she makes an issue out of it. Rex Apr 2012 #25
She absolutely has the right to speak. Sivafae Apr 2012 #27
All I'm trying to say is it really doesn't matter to me whether she worked or not. MoonRiver Apr 2012 #28
I think it does Aerows Apr 2012 #34
Didn't Marie Antoinette have problems too? Cleita Apr 2012 #36
Oh you are right Aerows Apr 2012 #37
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does it matter if Ann Rom...»Reply #9