Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

Showing Original Post only (View all)

CatWoman

(79,293 posts)
Fri Aug 15, 2014, 06:41 PM Aug 2014

The "crime" committed by Mike Brown was shoplifting - NOT "stong arm robbery" [View all]

same as these people:



Arrested for stealing $5,500 worth of clothes and accessories at Saks Fifth Avenue in Beverly Hills (2001)



Walked out of a jewelry store with a $2,500 necklace (2011)



Allegedly stole a wig from the Hustler store in Hollywood and a lighter from a gas station (2007)



Admitted to stealing make-up from Wal-Mart when she was a teen


http://www.ranker.com/list/celebrities-who-have-been-caught-shoplifting/celebrity-lists?format=SLIDESHOW&page=3

143 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I dont think he should have been killed. cwydro Aug 2014 #1
what I saw was the clerk being rebuffed CatWoman Aug 2014 #6
Doesn't matter if clerk grabbed him first. onenote Aug 2014 #105
Certainly not just stealing. 840high Aug 2014 #112
"Rebuffed" LOL maced666 Aug 2014 #136
I agree. If that was him, he committed shoplifting and assault. Chemisse Aug 2014 #92
No! It's rebuffing LOL! maced666 Aug 2014 #137
I'm not sure I understand what you're talking about. Chemisse Aug 2014 #142
Didn't look like shoplifting to me Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #2
Shoplifting (also known as boosting, five-finger discount, or shrinkage within the retail industry) CatWoman Aug 2014 #3
WOW! great post. Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #8
Praise from Caesar? CatWoman Aug 2014 #10
You'll have to look I suppose Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #14
found it!! CatWoman Aug 2014 #19
I'm fine. I'm resting... Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #23
:) pinboy3niner Aug 2014 #35
... Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #39
Ed McMahon in da house! CatWoman Aug 2014 #126
nice to meet you Resting CatWoman Aug 2014 #47
Now you're just being sweet, but I'm too old to be green Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #49
same here CatWoman Aug 2014 #53
... Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #60
wikipedia is not the best source for how crimes are defined in Missouri. n/t Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #129
Yep. linuxman Aug 2014 #4
I'm sure the courts will allow your statement all the validity and credibility it warrants. LanternWaste Aug 2014 #20
Huh? Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #25
Did he take the guys wallet or some item of his person? ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #65
What does that mean, resisting a merchant? Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #71
A merchant has the right to detain a person if they ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #72
That is interesting. Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #89
Perhaps assault. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #90
Perhaps Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #96
I am a lawyer. And his actions would amount to robbery in the second degree onenote Aug 2014 #106
According to those definitons, I see where that case could be argued. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #119
I don't think anyone here has even remotely suggested that shooting Brown was justified onenote Aug 2014 #120
Yes. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #123
People are charged with and convicted of forcible (second degree) robbery frequently. onenote Aug 2014 #127
Thanks for the info. ohnoyoudidnt Aug 2014 #131
Currently I'm a regulatory attorney and litigator onenote Aug 2014 #132
In Missouri, robbery = theft + violence (e.g. shoving the merchant). n/t Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #130
Still doesn't justify getting shot. tenderfoot Aug 2014 #73
No shit!!! Boom Sound 416 Aug 2014 #74
Those claiming this incident was "robbery" SaltyBro Aug 2014 #5
BINGO!!! CatWoman Aug 2014 #7
It was robbery wercal Aug 2014 #11
I didn't see a weapon SaltyBro Aug 2014 #12
well CatWoman Aug 2014 #13
Strong arm is a legal term cwydro Aug 2014 #27
and in this case CatWoman Aug 2014 #29
No wercal Aug 2014 #59
"Usually" does not equal "are mandatory for the charge." WinkyDink Aug 2014 #69
Try looking up the definition OrwellwasRight Aug 2014 #116
Bullshit..... Logical Aug 2014 #63
Some of us are trying to clarify what the law is. onenote Aug 2014 #108
Theft + assault = robbery. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #9
FWIW... I was a grocery store clerk in 1983... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #15
In the days before CCTV Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #17
I just saw the CCTV of the convenience store incident... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #18
Which is irrelevant Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #22
Gotcha... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #26
I'm coming from having an actual understanding of the law: Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #28
In what capacity do you have an "understanding of the law"? Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #30
I'm not a cop, if that's what you're asking. Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #31
Robbery has different meanings in the law. Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #36
Doesn't matter if he was examined by medical professionals, or not? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #42
I can read... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #43
Are you sure you can? Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #46
You didn't clearly say either... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #52
Yes, I did: Spider Jerusalem Aug 2014 #54
While I agree with that... Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #58
Doesn't matter if clerk shoved him first. onenote Aug 2014 #109
Even touching someone without permission can be assault. LisaL Aug 2014 #40
I'm basing what I said on a personal incident 30 years ago. Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #45
The timing of the release of info about the theft has no bearing on the definition of the crime. cui bono Aug 2014 #44
It means a lot - why today if they had this info days ago? Cooley Hurd Aug 2014 #50
I means a lot about something OTHER than whether or not this is strong-armed robbery cui bono Aug 2014 #66
Thank You unapatriciated Aug 2014 #16
Those video feeds are damaging yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #76
I saw them unapatriciated Aug 2014 #138
Whether he was a shoplifter, a strong-armed robber, or anything else, Nye Bevan Aug 2014 #21
That's the key point. I'm not one to think the video is totally irrelevant, but shooting someone Hoyt Aug 2014 #32
+1000000 nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #93
I think the cops got their damn tapes and stories mixed up. Octafish Aug 2014 #24
Not sure I understand that being the problem facing democracy. JEB Aug 2014 #85
''Money trumps peace'' abroad and at home. Octafish Aug 2014 #134
This morning a local radio host said he had robbed a bank... kentuck Aug 2014 #33
While I have no doubt that the use of the term "strong-armed robbery" is intentional cui bono Aug 2014 #34
I think strong-armed robbery clarifes that it's not armed robbery. LisaL Aug 2014 #38
Yes. And "strong-armed" clarifies that it's not shoplifting. cui bono Aug 2014 #41
The threat of force is sufficient for a robbery charge. name not needed Aug 2014 #56
Britney Spears and (maybe?) Megan Fox. nt tblue37 Aug 2014 #75
That's false. LisaL Aug 2014 #37
my op is based on observations from Brown's friends attorney CatWoman Aug 2014 #51
An unbiased source if there ever was one mythology Aug 2014 #79
I tend to not listen to armchair lawyers CatWoman Aug 2014 #111
But you have no problem in being one? onenote Aug 2014 #113
I fail to understand your claim CatWoman Aug 2014 #117
What I saw is an OP that declared (and still declares): onenote Aug 2014 #121
and yet your original response is to my post in which I reference to CatWoman Aug 2014 #122
Could you provide a link? onenote Aug 2014 #125
How about MO. state law? IronGate Aug 2014 #114
Yep it crossed the line when he assualted the clerk, rudolph the red Aug 2014 #55
As far as I know gvstn Aug 2014 #48
Nah it was alleged shoplifting standingtall Aug 2014 #57
Statute from website of lawyer on detaining suspect exboyfil Aug 2014 #62
Apparently a customer called the cops about the robbery. The store clerk did not. nt tblue37 Aug 2014 #77
Why might that be? jberryhill Aug 2014 #83
Minor loss, perhaps, and the clerk did not want to deal with all tblue37 Aug 2014 #84
Well said. It's unbelievable how the police are trying to justify this heinous killing. Liberal_from_va34 Aug 2014 #61
They are trying to smear the murder victim, not necessarily "justify." WinkyDink Aug 2014 #70
Killing an unarmed kid is more serious JEB Aug 2014 #64
Who was the kid killed yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #78
Kid or adult, he's just as dead by brutal execution. JEB Aug 2014 #87
Lol. Fair enough yeoman6987 Aug 2014 #133
Your last sentence is a bit silly. But otherwise you're dead-on. nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #94
I dont think Winona or Lindsay beat up the clerk on the way out of the store davidn3600 Aug 2014 #67
i notice you said nothing about Megan Fox... Enrique Aug 2014 #68
They are not dead in the street either. JEB Aug 2014 #80
+1 nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #95
i shouldn't laugh, this is a serious subject CatWoman Aug 2014 #98
Amidst all this discussion, it's easy to forget JEB Aug 2014 #99
beautiful words CatWoman Aug 2014 #100
Thanks. This whole story and JEB Aug 2014 #102
Thanks. Nor were they twice the size of the clerk; nor did they outweigh him/her by 200 lbs. Smarmie Doofus Aug 2014 #82
When was the clerk beat up. npk Aug 2014 #103
Once Mr. Brown put his hands on the clerk, IronGate Aug 2014 #107
Police always engage in charge inflation Warpy Aug 2014 #81
agreed bigtree Aug 2014 #86
In high school, I shoplifted a Bic lighter from Walgreens. HuckleB Aug 2014 #88
IF the person in the video is Brown then he did commit Strong-Arm robbery rustydog Aug 2014 #91
I heard that Brown's parents said it is him in the video. hamsterjill Aug 2014 #104
And even if a more serious charge might have been possible - based on the CCTV footage - nomorenomore08 Aug 2014 #97
unreal Chimeradog Aug 2014 #101
It wasn't petit larceny/theft. IronGate Aug 2014 #110
Egad DustyJoe Aug 2014 #115
Ummm, his parents have already said it's him in the video IronGate Aug 2014 #118
The video is proof a strong arm robbery was commited by whoever is in the video. Lil Missy Aug 2014 #124
And how many of those occurred in Missouri? Ms. Toad Aug 2014 #128
Yeah they keep using that term to scare people. Rex Aug 2014 #135
Exactly. It was shoplifting. Vinca Aug 2014 #139
It was obviously so trivial that the store itself never called the cops MohRokTah Aug 2014 #140
Did you mean to say trivial? It may be that the store owner knew that calling the cops was useless rudolph the red Aug 2014 #141
thank you Chimeradog Aug 2014 #143
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The "crime" com...