Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: The pile-on on Thomas Kinkaide - it's not about the art - [View all]CBGLuthier
(12,723 posts)21. I put him right in the same class as Warhol
Commercial art at its finest as it almost resembles "art" art whatever the hell "art" art is anyway.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
116 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I'm more into steampunk. Never really liked many paintings except for Monet regardless of the
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#14
Well, you can compare Monet's treatment of the little footbridge in his Giverny garden painting
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#24
I'm not sure what I'm supposed to be realizing from their treatment of footbridges. nt
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#29
I don't think there is anything you are "supposed" to be realizing, except what
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#62
Of course. You are right about Christina. But I do think that Wyeth was aware of Eakins works.
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#52
I have never been intellectual enough to tell people what qualifies as art and what does not. nt
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#73
Now art is a science? Reminds me of parents telling their kids "that's not real music" througout
Snake Alchemist
Apr 2012
#93
And besides, Picasso was, with his Analytic Cubism, carrying Cezanne's vision (see his Bibemus
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#60
Skill doesn't make something art. Viewers liking something doesn't make it art, either.
Demit
Apr 2012
#66
What makes it "art" is being collected by rich people. That's the sum & total of it.
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#82
He stood there next to a stack of printed canvases, dabbed on a highlight, signed the canvas, and
Demit
Apr 2012
#77
Of course you were addressing me. You hit Reply to my post, and you were quoting my words.
Demit
Apr 2012
#107
Seems, he was somewhat of a vicious hypocrite with socoipathic tendencies....wow.
Ecumenist
Apr 2012
#3
YES! No time to go into details, but he was unethical and treated people badly.
TalkingDog
Apr 2012
#7
Thank you. That's exactly what I keep saying. Hell, I even "like" Bob Ross on my facebook page.
TalkingDog
Apr 2012
#6
People like warhol aren't hard to understand. They like cash, they like to be around people with
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#101
Do you think we'll see Kinkade's stuff at MoMA, on the same floor with the Jasper Johns and
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#27
As I have said, this "high art/low art" discussion is timeworn. It goes on and on. And there is
CTyankee
Apr 2012
#58
Except that the people doing the pile-on seemed to make it about his art.
Tommy_Carcetti
Apr 2012
#28
He should have just done a "Piss Christ" and others would have loved him
The Straight Story
Apr 2012
#59
it's outrageous that Kinkaide was rewarded with million$ for his unoriginal appeals
librechik
Apr 2012
#72
lots of hypocrisy out there; this guy's hypocrisy seems to have spawned threads all out of
HiPointDem
Apr 2012
#113