General Discussion

Larry Ogg

(1,474 posts)

58. If there was any real justice in this country...

Sat Apr 7, 2012, 04:09 PM

Apr 2012

The 5-criminal judges would themselves be in prison.

And they would have lots of criminal politicians to keep them company.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

69 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In Case You Missed The Annihilation Of The 4th Amendment... With The Blessings Of A Democrat... [View all] WillyT Apr 2012 OP

The 4th Amendment's been gone for years. That's why our prisons are full of pot smokers. Warren DeMontague Apr 2012 #1

This country is done. MrSlayer Apr 2012 #2

Makes quaint phrases like the land of the free and home of the brave and the right to life, indepat Apr 2012 #13

No name, no quote, just a vague accusation from The Guardian? banned from Kos Apr 2012 #3

No Man... You Don't Get It... We Have To Triangulate, And Prove Our Right-Wing Bona-Fides To... WillyT Apr 2012 #6

.... DeSwiss Apr 2012 #14

"a victory for the jails and for the Obama administration" villager Apr 2012 #4

That person is simply stating an opinion as a commentator banned from Kos Apr 2012 #7

The real question is -- where is the DOJ to support *us*? villager Apr 2012 #69

Just another reason cyglet Apr 2012 #5

Reminder... What The 4th Amendment GUARANTEED !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #8

I love ProSense Apr 2012 #9

Nader supporters didn't think judicial appoints were a high priority. libinnyandia Apr 2012 #10

It's a given that Obama (the lesser evil), will appoint lesser evil judges. Larry Ogg Apr 2012 #56

The Democrats aren't perfect and have been moving to the right but at least there is a little hope libinnyandia Apr 2012 #61

I vote Democrat because I believe that for so many good people, the lesser evil is the last hope... Larry Ogg Apr 2012 #68

+1. Yeah, we'll let the Supremes off on this one. They're Obamabots. freshwest Apr 2012 #11

So... Explain Please... Why Did The Obama DOJ Argue In Support Of This Decision ??? WillyT Apr 2012 #12

Tut tut...you don't actually expect the point to be addressed? bread_and_roses Apr 2012 #15

+ 1,000,000,000... What You Said !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #17

Oh sorry, ProSense Apr 2012 #22

I have been scrolling right past your posts for over two yeats Occulus Apr 2012 #35

"Address the point succinctly, prosense, or do us all a favor and keep your stewhole shut." ProSense Apr 2012 #48

Again, sidestepping the issue... TiberiusB Apr 2012 #59

here is the linked DOJ "argument" from ABC News banned from Kos Apr 2012 #18

Did You READ The OP ??? WillyT Apr 2012 #19

Blame the officers who should have listened to him about his proof of payment. FarLeftFist Apr 2012 #32

This entire subthread is like something out of Alice in Wonderland, woo me with science Apr 2012 #42

Maybe Greenwald ProSense Apr 2012 #21

He runs every agency, and the Attorney General certainly TransitJohn Apr 2012 #24

So do you believe this lawyer went rogue? shawn703 Apr 2012 #25

She likely ProSense Apr 2012 #31

Yeah, that happens to all good Presidents. woo me with science Apr 2012 #40

She was obviously drugged by the delight woo me with science Apr 2012 #39

LOL !!! WillyT Apr 2012 #51

Being ProSense Apr 2012 #54

You sound ProSense Apr 2012 #53

Thank you! lonestarnot Apr 2012 #52

If there was any real justice in this country... Larry Ogg Apr 2012 #58

K&R DeSwiss Apr 2012 #16

Isolated risks justify the most sweeping security measures pscot Apr 2012 #20

It's a civil rights thing. Right. saras Apr 2012 #23

Exactly ... markpkessinger Apr 2012 #42

This SCOTUS is an embarrassment to our country. limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #26

Forced nudity to control the population - what next? sad sally Apr 2012 #27

Ms. Wolf makes a good point there. limpyhobbler Apr 2012 #28

Make no mistake, these strip searches have little or nothing to do with "security" DefenseLawyer Apr 2012 #29

How many people were trapped and arrested on that bridge during the Occupy protests? woo me with science Apr 2012 #30

For those that want to read the brief the Department of Justice submitted, arguing that... PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #33

Thank you for this. Vattel Apr 2012 #49

Hey, Obama was once a law professor Canuckistanian Apr 2012 #34

Well it is legal *now*. I fell for that Constitutional Lawyer BS too. kenny blankenship Apr 2012 #57

yet ANOTHER vindication of my decision to not vote for Obama this fall Occulus Apr 2012 #36

i wont vote for Obama upi402 Apr 2012 #37

That's ProSense Apr 2012 #45

And to ProSense Apr 2012 #46

Uh, the federal prison population continues to increase under Obama. Comrade Grumpy Apr 2012 #60

Sure, ProSense Apr 2012 #66

Can you refute anything he said? TiberiusB Apr 2012 #62

+1000 Vattel Apr 2012 #67

Well, ProSense Apr 2012 #44

kr Norrin Radd Apr 2012 #38

How convenient. Blue_In_AK Apr 2012 #41

so florence gets arrested but zimmerman doesn't. nt tomp Apr 2012 #47

Normally progressive causes should live in fear of Glenn Greenwald gulliver Apr 2012 #50

This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Apr 2012 #55

I don't get why President Obama felix_numinous Apr 2012 #63

Me Neither... WillyT Apr 2012 #65

Chip by chip, piece by piece, our freedoms are being eroded. WHEN CRABS ROAR Apr 2012 #64