General Discussion

quinnox

(20,600 posts)

9. I recently looked at the OJ case again, and he might not have done it

Fri Apr 6, 2012, 05:12 PM

Apr 2012

For a long time, I was in the camp that it was obvious he did it, but if you look at the evidence, there is some legit suspicion some of it was planted or altered. I think OJ was the person who was ultimately responsible, in that he probably paid someone else to actually commit the crime, but had full knowledge of the planned crime, while he may even have accompanied them to the scene.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

35 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is it fair to say Zimmerman has MORE hard evidence against him than OJ Simpson did? [View all] uponit7771 Apr 2012 OP

Simpson had a literal trail of blood leading to him Syrinx Apr 2012 #1

ZMan admitted to shooting a kid who was doing nothing to him too....OJ never admitted anything uponit7771 Apr 2012 #2

And didn't have a state-granted marybourg Apr 2012 #5

How you lose a case like this is beyond me. Booster Apr 2012 #6

If the glove don't fit, you must acquit. Recovered Repug Apr 2012 #25

The jury lost the case obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #30

I thought OJ was too stupid to do those murders in all honesty. vaberella Apr 2012 #3

That's my thinking, they've screwN up enough to the point the guy can't be prosecuted uponit7771 Apr 2012 #4

The girlfriend was finally interviewed this week pokerfan Apr 2012 #23

I watched the entire saga cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #11

OJ is clearly a psychopath and had the ability to do the crimes. He Liquorice Apr 2012 #24

The problem for me is that was once his home and he does have access to it. vaberella Apr 2012 #35

He was. That's why he left so much evidence behind. nt Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #28

The crime scene showed a buffoon did it obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #31

I don't think that 'evidence' has anything to do with it.... wandy Apr 2012 #7

I told my wife when the matter first became public Solomon Apr 2012 #8

Evidence of what? That's part of the problem. OJ's trial had mountain of evidence of murder Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #29

+1 obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #32

Totally ignoring all the planted evidence. the difference Solomon Apr 2012 #33

I recently looked at the OJ case again, and he might not have done it quinnox Apr 2012 #9

Interesting possible movie plot line Kaleva Apr 2012 #14

yes, it is convoluted for sure quinnox Apr 2012 #15

I think OJ was an overwhelming circumstantial case. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2012 #22

What hard evidence shows that Zimmerman isn't covered by the "Stand your ground" law? Kaleva Apr 2012 #10

You can't be serious!? Solomon Apr 2012 #12

are you serious? Kalidurga Apr 2012 #13

Other evidence Kaleva Apr 2012 #17

There is zero evidence for Zimmerman. Kalidurga Apr 2012 #19

Well, we don't actually have Zimmerman's statements Kaleva Apr 2012 #20

ZMans police statements are evidence that his lawyers are NOT arguing uponit7771 Apr 2012 #27

Jesus h christ. what is wrong wirh people. the kid Solomon Apr 2012 #34

Good Question ... Tough to prove negative feelings at one past point in time cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #16

no. there was more evidence against OJ. Not that Zimmerman shouldn't be arrested. cali Apr 2012 #18

Nope, if you follow the law and take out the racist Furhman evidence that was thrown uponit7771 Apr 2012 #26

how about CAsey Anthony and Scott Peterson ? JI7 Apr 2012 #21