Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Is it fair to say Zimmerman has MORE hard evidence against him than OJ Simpson did? [View all]Solomon
(12,305 posts)8. I told my wife when the matter first became public
that if ever there was a case of "mountains of evidence", this was it. Why aren't they calling it?
I watched the entire trial of OJ. Every evening I sat in amazement watching the news and talk shows mislead the public about it. The jury had to scrint their eyes looking thru microscopes for the so-called "mountains of evidence."
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
35 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Is it fair to say Zimmerman has MORE hard evidence against him than OJ Simpson did? [View all]
uponit7771
Apr 2012
OP
ZMan admitted to shooting a kid who was doing nothing to him too....OJ never admitted anything
uponit7771
Apr 2012
#2
That's my thinking, they've screwN up enough to the point the guy can't be prosecuted
uponit7771
Apr 2012
#4
Evidence of what? That's part of the problem. OJ's trial had mountain of evidence of murder
Honeycombe8
Apr 2012
#29
What hard evidence shows that Zimmerman isn't covered by the "Stand your ground" law?
Kaleva
Apr 2012
#10
Nope, if you follow the law and take out the racist Furhman evidence that was thrown
uponit7771
Apr 2012
#26