Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Solomon

(12,305 posts)
8. I told my wife when the matter first became public
Fri Apr 6, 2012, 05:07 PM
Apr 2012

that if ever there was a case of "mountains of evidence", this was it. Why aren't they calling it?

I watched the entire trial of OJ. Every evening I sat in amazement watching the news and talk shows mislead the public about it. The jury had to scrint their eyes looking thru microscopes for the so-called "mountains of evidence."

Simpson had a literal trail of blood leading to him Syrinx Apr 2012 #1
ZMan admitted to shooting a kid who was doing nothing to him too....OJ never admitted anything uponit7771 Apr 2012 #2
And didn't have a state-granted marybourg Apr 2012 #5
How you lose a case like this is beyond me. Booster Apr 2012 #6
If the glove don't fit, you must acquit. Recovered Repug Apr 2012 #25
The jury lost the case obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #30
I thought OJ was too stupid to do those murders in all honesty. vaberella Apr 2012 #3
That's my thinking, they've screwN up enough to the point the guy can't be prosecuted uponit7771 Apr 2012 #4
The girlfriend was finally interviewed this week pokerfan Apr 2012 #23
I watched the entire saga cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #11
OJ is clearly a psychopath and had the ability to do the crimes. He Liquorice Apr 2012 #24
The problem for me is that was once his home and he does have access to it. vaberella Apr 2012 #35
He was. That's why he left so much evidence behind. nt Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #28
The crime scene showed a buffoon did it obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #31
I don't think that 'evidence' has anything to do with it.... wandy Apr 2012 #7
I told my wife when the matter first became public Solomon Apr 2012 #8
Evidence of what? That's part of the problem. OJ's trial had mountain of evidence of murder Honeycombe8 Apr 2012 #29
+1 obamanut2012 Apr 2012 #32
Totally ignoring all the planted evidence. the difference Solomon Apr 2012 #33
I recently looked at the OJ case again, and he might not have done it quinnox Apr 2012 #9
Interesting possible movie plot line Kaleva Apr 2012 #14
yes, it is convoluted for sure quinnox Apr 2012 #15
I think OJ was an overwhelming circumstantial case. Manifestor_of_Light Apr 2012 #22
What hard evidence shows that Zimmerman isn't covered by the "Stand your ground" law? Kaleva Apr 2012 #10
You can't be serious!? Solomon Apr 2012 #12
are you serious? Kalidurga Apr 2012 #13
Other evidence Kaleva Apr 2012 #17
There is zero evidence for Zimmerman. Kalidurga Apr 2012 #19
Well, we don't actually have Zimmerman's statements Kaleva Apr 2012 #20
ZMans police statements are evidence that his lawyers are NOT arguing uponit7771 Apr 2012 #27
Jesus h christ. what is wrong wirh people. the kid Solomon Apr 2012 #34
Good Question ... Tough to prove negative feelings at one past point in time cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #16
no. there was more evidence against OJ. Not that Zimmerman shouldn't be arrested. cali Apr 2012 #18
Nope, if you follow the law and take out the racist Furhman evidence that was thrown uponit7771 Apr 2012 #26
how about CAsey Anthony and Scott Peterson ? JI7 Apr 2012 #21
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is it fair to say Zimmerm...»Reply #8