In the discussion thread: Obama Signs Wall Street/Corporate Backed "Jobs Act": A “Recipe for Fraud” And Job Destruction [View all]
Response to Better Believe It (Original post)
Thu Apr 5, 2012, 06:10 PM
ProSense (116,387 posts)
3. I knew
I'd have another opportunity before the end of the day to address this issue. Repeat post:
I see people using comments made before the Senate changes. A lot of the opposition was to the House version. The fact that, per the Merkley amendment, investors with incomes or net worth less than $100,000 are limited to 5 percent of their income and must be provided information helps. Senator Reeds amendment would have added more protection, but it was filibusted by Republicans.
The House passed the bill with a few progressive votes, including:
Still, given that there is a massive package of regulation (which gets little attention from the critics of the OP bill) still being implemented, I doubt it will have the devastating impact being predicted.
Banks’ preemptive strike against Dodd-Frank
By Suzy Khimm
When Deutsche Bank reorganized its U.S. operations this week in response to new banking rules, it was the latest manifestation of what both supporters and opponents of the Dodd-Frank regulatory overhaul predicted would happen: The law has pushed big banks to reorganize — to comply with the new rules on Wall Street, as well as to avoid their impact...Deutsche Bank and London-based Barclays have moved their commercial banks from their U.S. subsidiaries into their global firms to avoid new, more stringent capital requirements — even though they don’t go into effect until July 2015.
But that doesn’t necessarily mean that Dodd-Frank has fallen short of what its authors intended. By giving up its status as a U.S. bank holding company, Deutsche Bank is forfeiting its access to the Federal Reserve’s emergency lending window. Doing so effectively cuts itself out of any future government-backed bailout in the event of a crisis. One of the overarching goals of Dodd-Frank was limiting taxpayer exposure to bailing out big firms.
“They’re saying, ‘If this is the price we have to pay, we’re going to shed that protection — we’re not too big to fail,’ ” said University of Maryland law professor Michael Greenberger, a former regulator at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Deutsche Bank was the Fed’s second-largest discount-window borrower during the 2008-2009 crisis.
The Volcker Rule, which is scheduled to take effect in July, also prohibits banks from providing more than 3 percent of capital in private-equity or hedge funds, prompting banks to spin off those operations as well. Other Dodd-Frank rules recently prompted insurance giant MetLife to sell its FDIC-insured banking unit, which would have subjected the firm to greater regulation and scrutiny by the Federal Reserve.
- more -
Regulators Move Closer to Oversight of Nonbanks
Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||OP|
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||#1|
|woo me with science||Apr 2012||#16|
|great white snark||Apr 2012||#6|
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||#9|
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||#12|
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||#25|
|Better Believe It||Apr 2012||#26|
|woo me with science||Apr 2012||#27|
Please login to view edit histories.