Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: Democrats Introduce Bill that Could Lead to Impeachment for Justices Thomas and Scalia [View all]IrishAyes
(6,151 posts)26. Whether it passes or not, we need to run that up the flagpole to mark parameters.
And then push with all our might, not letting up for one second no matter how long it takes!
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
170 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Democrats Introduce Bill that Could Lead to Impeachment for Justices Thomas and Scalia [View all]
eridani
Jul 2014
OP
Check the Baking Needs aisle. They have Betty Crocker and Duncan Heinz mixes there....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#37
You can always mix coconut extract and shredded coconut with white or creamcheese frosting....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#68
Yup,...and the new generation will think that's how it's supposed to taste....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#91
Yes, but the generation before boxed cake mixes thought the exact same thing.
cui bono
Jul 2014
#111
It's easy. Fire up a whole box of wooden matches and walk through the cloud.
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#158
I beg your pardon?!!? I don't know about grocery stores, but I made each event cake myself, and
genwah
Jul 2014
#79
We now see an entire generation that has never experienced stuff we take for granted....
Spitfire of ATJ
Jul 2014
#86
I don't know, this says to me "look what we could do if we won more seats in 2014"
arcane1
Jul 2014
#20
I'm inclined to think that even if it did pass and get signed into law, Fat Tony and his
1monster
Jul 2014
#60
If we got that excited about attainable goals as we do pipe dreams like this
Puzzledtraveller
Jul 2014
#62
Hear, hear! GOTV in November is what counts now. Any of us who can file suit, or whatever
genwah
Jul 2014
#80
And I'll bring my cookies! Your cake's gonna get gobbled up straight away, and there'll need to be
calimary
Jul 2014
#48
I'm sure it will breeze right through the House. And the Senate won't filibuster it.
Fuddnik
Jul 2014
#7
Whether it passes or not, we need to run that up the flagpole to mark parameters.
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#26
Absolutely! Let it start rippling through the national discourse. Let it sink in - that this kind of
calimary
Jul 2014
#49
It is necessary to do this now! The majority of people have no clue what goes on
Rosa Luxemburg
Jul 2014
#69
And the spark that ignites the masses can never be predicted with certainty -
IrishAyes
Jul 2014
#88
I seem to recall something about ex post facto laws in the Constitution. n/t
PoliticAverse
Jul 2014
#34
14 years later, but great! Great to see them finally trying to check the court system.
Rex
Jul 2014
#10
Yeah back in 07 when Congress was flipped I wondered if they would try to
Guy Whitey Corngood
Jul 2014
#17
I can't get excited in the "introduction" of a bill. Get back to me when it actually
rhett o rick
Jul 2014
#53
I will be glad to participate. Where is the bill right now? I dont think that has been mentioned.
rhett o rick
Jul 2014
#105
how bout just putting all else aside and focus on keeping potus dem so we can xhange the scotus when
leftyohiolib
Jul 2014
#87
Article is dated August of 2013. Has this bill died somewhere or been re-introduced.
h2ebits
Jul 2014
#98
I have a better chance of winning the lottery than of Boehner bringing this up for a vote.
valerief
Jul 2014
#104
Sorry, I don't see this crop of Democrats impeaching anybody--that would upset the
blkmusclmachine
Jul 2014
#114
Bearing in mind that the power of impeachment still rests with the Republican House.
brooklynite
Jul 2014
#125
Then you would just have under cover, but still highly politicized justices.
Calista241
Jul 2014
#161