General Discussion

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)

8. decide your contraceptive" that's disingenuous he's not deciding what you can use

Reply to ZombieHorde (Reply #2)

Tue Jul 1, 2014, 02:14 PM

Jul 2014

he's just not willing to have it covered under the insurance - you cant still get and use what ever you want

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

46 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

From McJoan at Daily Kos. Supreme Court clarifies it means ALL contraceptive coverage in ACA [View all] madfloridian Jul 2014 OP

k&r... spanone Jul 2014 #1

That is good to know. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #2

decide your contraceptive" that's disingenuous he's not deciding what you can use leftyohiolib Jul 2014 #8

If you have money. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #11

That's the point. This is another decision that harms lower middle-class and poor people. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #29

i know but the title, which said something else and has since been changed , leftyohiolib Jul 2014 #31

Because money grows on trees. jeff47 Jul 2014 #20

that's what i dont get why wouoldnt anyone not want to cover b.c pills leftyohiolib Jul 2014 #32

Because the goal is not financial. The goal is theocratic. (nt) jeff47 Jul 2014 #33

Exactly. madfloridian Jul 2014 #37

Insurance that every person is required to have under law passiveporcupine Jul 2014 #46

Thanks for posting this RockaFowler Jul 2014 #3

Right. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #18

Why wait until November? PADemD Jul 2014 #38

Good idea. But we have to have control of the House and Senate to be able to impeach JDPriestly Jul 2014 #40

They are deliberately trying to confuse people IronLionZion Jul 2014 #4

The supreme cave dwellers got a chance to woman punch, one of their favorite sports. Rex Jul 2014 #5

Scalia's getting his revenge on. madfloridian Jul 2014 #6

So much for the lies of the RW media repeating "it's only the four abortion drugs"! Anansi1171 Jul 2014 #7

Still doesn't say....... WillowTree Jul 2014 #9

Are you trying to defend, or minimize, this ruling? frazzled Jul 2014 #10

I didn't defend or minimize anything. WillowTree Jul 2014 #12

But it applies to all birth control. kcr Jul 2014 #28

what you just said passiveporcupine Jul 2014 #30

Why is that important? JDPriestly Jul 2014 #41

If there were comparable male contraceptives cerveza_gratis Jul 2014 #13

Well there you have it Hekate Jul 2014 #14

Medicare. For. All. BrotherIvan Jul 2014 #15

No shit, you would think it would upset some rightys that this decision randys1 Jul 2014 #26

" still offers 16 kinds of birth control" shows full of sh!t this whole thing is underpants Jul 2014 #16

Worse than is even being discussed Zoonart Jul 2014 #17

I think you are largely correct in the way you see the argument playing out HereSince1628 Jul 2014 #25

Very much agree Zoonart Jul 2014 #35

You make such a good point. JDPriestly Jul 2014 #43

great points, and well said. BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2014 #44

The War On Women has arrived at the SCOTUS. 5 fascists in black robes! blkmusclmachine Jul 2014 #19

Associated Press too, in case someone wants a mainscream media source progree Jul 2014 #21

Direct link is good idea. madfloridian Jul 2014 #24

Recommend...this makes it clear what the intent of those 5 Jutices was about.... KoKo Jul 2014 #42

This case is another argument for the public option. muntrv Jul 2014 #22

I. FUCKING. HATE. EACH. AND. EVERY. ONE. OF. THEM!!! lark Jul 2014 #23

Not half as much as they hate YOU if you are a Woman and how much they hate Obama randys1 Jul 2014 #27

I think I hate them more. lark Jul 2014 #39

Not getting pregnant can be a matter of life or death Freddie Jul 2014 #34

So true. It's a dangerous thing.. madfloridian Jul 2014 #36

^^^ this^^^ BlancheSplanchnik Jul 2014 #45