Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: An oldie from Greenwald. NSFW. Trigger Warning. BAD Language. You've been warned. [View all]Cha
(297,137 posts)1. Thanks Oilem.. from your link.. "Greenwald sets up a false dichotomy between.. " Shocking!
if youre going to talk about how far weve come when it comes to porn, if youre going to posit Paul Max Hardcore Little as the latest victim of the Bush administration, if youre going to lament one more strike against your First Amendment rights, you should bear witness as to what a porn star drenched in vomit looks like.
"..Thats a quote from (link is to a NSFW site) Susannah Breslin, in her response to a Salon column by Glenn Greenwald. Greenwald sets up a false dichotomy between the DoJs prosecution of pornographer Max Hardcore, and governmental performance and perpetuation of torture. After making the fairly obvious point that torture is wrong, Greenwald repeatedly asserts that Hardcores actions are fictional and says that no real pain was inflicted. Yet Breslin says the following about Hardcores ouvre:
snip//
"At the same time, it couldnt be more clear that Greenwald couldnt care less about the real women who were harmed by Hardcores pornography production. By dismissing what happened to them as fiction he is promulgating the view that pornography performers are lying whores who deserve whatever bad things happen to them. Torture is only wrong when it happens to men, apparently."
"I apologize for linking to Glenn Greenwald"
snip//
(Update: I have been asked to preface this post with a warning that readers may find it disturbing.)
"When I posted a link to Glenn Greenwalds column the other day, I was unaware of his history as an advocate for torturers. Greenwald has vigorously championed torturers rights, has explicitly privileged their version of events over that of their victims, and has asserted in agreement with the torturers that no real pain was inflicted on the victims.
Of course these arent the torturers at Gitmo or Abu Ghraib. Its the film company of Max Hardcore, an extreme pornographer who grossly abused women while filming the proceedings for the entertainment of other men. Hardcore claims his victims were thrilled to be tortured, and Greenwald accepts this point of view unquestioningly."
Amazing what a difference gender makes, huh?
http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2009/05/25/i-apologize-for-linking-to-glenn-greenwald/
Such an "honorable man".. not.
"..Thats a quote from (link is to a NSFW site) Susannah Breslin, in her response to a Salon column by Glenn Greenwald. Greenwald sets up a false dichotomy between the DoJs prosecution of pornographer Max Hardcore, and governmental performance and perpetuation of torture. After making the fairly obvious point that torture is wrong, Greenwald repeatedly asserts that Hardcores actions are fictional and says that no real pain was inflicted. Yet Breslin says the following about Hardcores ouvre:
snip//
"At the same time, it couldnt be more clear that Greenwald couldnt care less about the real women who were harmed by Hardcores pornography production. By dismissing what happened to them as fiction he is promulgating the view that pornography performers are lying whores who deserve whatever bad things happen to them. Torture is only wrong when it happens to men, apparently."
"I apologize for linking to Glenn Greenwald"
snip//
(Update: I have been asked to preface this post with a warning that readers may find it disturbing.)
"When I posted a link to Glenn Greenwalds column the other day, I was unaware of his history as an advocate for torturers. Greenwald has vigorously championed torturers rights, has explicitly privileged their version of events over that of their victims, and has asserted in agreement with the torturers that no real pain was inflicted on the victims.
Of course these arent the torturers at Gitmo or Abu Ghraib. Its the film company of Max Hardcore, an extreme pornographer who grossly abused women while filming the proceedings for the entertainment of other men. Hardcore claims his victims were thrilled to be tortured, and Greenwald accepts this point of view unquestioningly."
Amazing what a difference gender makes, huh?
http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2009/05/25/i-apologize-for-linking-to-glenn-greenwald/
Such an "honorable man".. not.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
23 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
An oldie from Greenwald. NSFW. Trigger Warning. BAD Language. You've been warned. [View all]
OilemFirchen
Jun 2014
OP
Thanks Oilem.. from your link.. "Greenwald sets up a false dichotomy between.. " Shocking!
Cha
Jun 2014
#1
SMH.. such "an honorable man".. quote from a greenwald fan. I don't call him Greedy Greenwald for
Cha
Jun 2014
#22