General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: "Men's Rights" cracks me up. [View all]BainsBane
(53,031 posts)Just about every time, if not every time, you have had a discussion with me. Here are just a few examples: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4814931
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4609392
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4608768
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4605969
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4605895
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4591904
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4564741
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4322794
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4133211
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1139&pid=10332
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1139&pid=10322
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1139&pid=10318
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1172&pid=132200
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3676202
(By the way, "starting in on" you amounted to pointing out the main point of the article. In what universe is that considered an attack? And you accuse me of playing victim? )
Why would you pretend you haven't done something that you clearly do frequently, something easily verified by a search? How very strange.
I stand up for women. I stand up against women attacked by those who do it most frequently, and they are not in HOF. For example: http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=31166
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=31164
(I personally saw the comment you insist you never made. Given your denial of those many sock comments, I'm thinking that denying what you say is an ongoing habit of yours. I don't know whether it's intentional or you truly have no sense of what you post. Either way, it's not good).
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=31161
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1255&pid=31158
I stood up for her against those ugly attacks in a couple of ways. I asked the HOF hosts to ban you. I imagine I probably told you what I thought as well, as is my tendency. I also raised the issue in ATA. I got a number of responses from non-HOF members expressing amazement that your attacks weren't hidden by a jury. Meanwhile, you don't stand up for Sea even when I linked to rape threats to her. You can't even bring yourself to mention them. I don't see that you are in any position to criticize me on that particular issue. Speaking of which, have you stood up for your friend against the male member who gave her a pat on the head?
How exactly do you decide who qualifies as a woman or not? Why is it okay for you and people you agree with to attack and insult women, but if someone else makes a single comment six months ago, that is an outrage? Ain't I a woman? Isn't Seabeyond a woman? What does it take to qualify as a woman in your eyes? Does the fact we have the audacity to disagree with a handful of men mean we don't qualify as women? Does the fact we discuss issues rather than tearing down other women, as is the practice in some circles, mean we don't qualify as women? Could it be that women who don't stay in their place, the place determined by men who resent the fact that women speak on issues of which they don't approve, mean we don't qualify as women in your eyes?
As for inventing slights to complain about, I would suggest your OP mocking Will Pitt's post on MRAs is a prime example. You erected an enormous strawman without providing a single example to back up your claims, even when asked by multiple posters to do so.