Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Are you suggesting that the pipeline will be rejected? polichick Apr 2014 #1
? n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #2
Wouldn't bet on it. polichick Apr 2014 #3
Wouldn't "bet" on anything ProSense Apr 2014 #7
Honestly, given the U.N. climate report, we should be able to bet on it. polichick Apr 2014 #8
"Honestly" ProSense Apr 2014 #11
Doubtful, but the verbiage defending the construction of the ppeline.... Junkdrawer Apr 2014 #4
Obama’s Plan to Curb Methane Emissions is a Big Step in Climate Fight ProSense Apr 2014 #5
"Unless we act dramatically and quickly" ... ain't gonna happen. Next. nt ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #6
Why hasn't the Boxer-Sanders climate bill gotten more attention? ProSense Apr 2014 #9
Are you suggesting that this will make it through Congress? polichick Apr 2014 #10
Why are you asking if posting information is a "suggestion" that an action will occur? n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #13
Just kiddin' with you - of course it won't make it through this Congress. polichick Apr 2014 #14
It could if Democrats take back the House. ProSense Apr 2014 #18
Before I read all that, does it say anywhere in there how this proposed legisaltion will be ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #12
You don't need to "read" it ProSense Apr 2014 #16
Ok, I don't mind reading it, thank you, but the world is not going to give up what it has to ChisolmTrailDem Apr 2014 #17
That's the appropriate language needed to express the urgency and light a fire. n/t ProSense Apr 2014 #19
Our President doesn't get all the credit he deserves.......K&R. AverageJoe90 Apr 2014 #15
I see this went over big! Something positive about Kerry and Climate Change. Cha Apr 2014 #20
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Kerry on Intergovernmenta...»Reply #20