Reply #342

In the discussion thread: Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial. [View all]

Sat Mar 24, 2012, 10:48 AM

342. Of course he deserves a trial.

But the fact remains he was not in a position of any kind of authority to demand anything from Trevon Martin. The police told him to back off and not pursue Martin. Martin, as we now know, was unarmed.

He has every right to mount a defense, but if the law in its strictest sense means anything anymore, he will be arrested, face trial, and be convicted of -- at the very least -- reckless homicide.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

346 replies	Author	Time	Post
Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial. [View all]	L0oniX	Mar 2012	OP
Whatcha talking about?	Kalidurga	Mar 2012	#1
No, I think people only want to ARREST him not "hang" him. nt	nanabugg	Mar 2012	#97
So you don't think Zimmerman put that bullet in an unarmed kid?	CakeGrrl	Mar 2012	#2
So you don't need a trial to decide who did what?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#4
LOonix you lose this argument.	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#14
"argumnet"?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#43
Yes, we need a stinking trial and I explicitly said so. You're being obtuse. nt	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#45
You troll	.99center	Mar 2012	#52
"You troll?" Are you kidding me?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#172
Sure	.99center	Mar 2012	#327
Did I miss something? Has Zimmerman been arrested and charged?	Booster	Mar 2012	#75
Not very bright are you?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#102
I'm sure you and the mob that you are part of would just go ahead and hang him now.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#131
This post was hidden by jury decision.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#134
You obviously can't carry on a decent discusion but have decended into...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#142
This post was hidden by jury decision.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#143
Just did jury for an alert on your post L0oniX...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#170
Indeed ...the "ridiculous responses" IMO are indicative of a mob mentality...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#175
I'll go you one further...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#177
Thanks for your thoughtful responces.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#182
Well, I don't know how much thought is required to see that	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#186
Unfortunatly this sort of thing is driving people away from DU.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#193
WOW. People tell you how wrong you are and it is a MOB!?	Rex	Mar 2012	#345
no, in George Zimmerman's world, there is no need for a trial, or even	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#196
and ye shall know them by their spelling	elehhhhna	Mar 2012	#340
If he'd been black and Trayvon white, you'd better believe	liberalhistorian	Mar 2012	#68
That's a bit reframing as the question is: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#185
So you don't need Zimmerman in custody or questioned for the trial?	.99center	Mar 2012	#15
Is that what I said? Troll much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#53
It's an honest question	.99center	Mar 2012	#69
No, that would be you.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#103
The irony of what you have said escapes you entirely.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#133
I'm quite sure you don't know what irony is.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#136
You can see the foolish in all the insults you've thrown at me...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#144
You know, the internet has tons of information available for you.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#145
I asked a question. "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#152
Frankly, I am amazed that more posts on this thread have not been hidden...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#181
Where and when did the OP say that?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#174
No where in the OP	.99center	Mar 2012	#314
What "muddies" the case is the mob hearsay, the media pile on and the injection of the race card.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#325
Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	.99center	Mar 2012	#336
The point is there was going to be NO further investigation.	savalez	Mar 2012	#18
Nothing wrong with justice as long as it comes from a court of law and not...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#46
You think maybe someone should've said that to Zimmerman?	jaded_old_cynic	Mar 2012	#80
Martin: Unarmed and shot dead. Zimmerman: Shooter.	CakeGrrl	Mar 2012	#22
Do we put someone in jail because the public thinks he's guilty?	Honeycombe8	Mar 2012	#25
No. We conduct a PROPER investigation, arrest suspects, and put them on trial	kestrel91316	Mar 2012	#32
Ding Ding Ding ...someone gets it.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#54
Well, you certainly don't get it. Read that post again - none of that was done.	Booster	Mar 2012	#88
Ding,Ding,Ding,	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#184
Your "ass" as you put it has not addressed the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#201
Only if you have...	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#204
So now I am saying Zim is innocent? WOW Put words into peoples mouths much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#206
Exactly.	Mojorabbit	Mar 2012	#61
First, there needs to be a full investigation, and an indictment handed down.	Honeycombe8	Mar 2012	#107
You're busting the narrative here	slackmaster	Mar 2012	#71
Droning unarmed kids is no better.	girl gone mad	Mar 2012	#223
Not pertaining to the op question but ...add the soldier who killed 16 Afgans.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#231
Who?	RobertEarl	Mar 2012	#3
we all want him arrested	Enrique	Mar 2012	#5
Net nanny much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#8
No, I want to see him arrested now rather than wait for the authorities in FL to lose interest.	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#6
That is not what it looks like to me.	Control-Z	Mar 2012	#7
"innocent" So you have all the facts then ...right?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#13
Yep.	Control-Z	Mar 2012	#20
Well LooniX, that has been the problem	Oilwellian	Mar 2012	#93
Yes, are you really so daft as to not realize this?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#111
I think the OP's point is	MrBig	Mar 2012	#123
There are plenty of absolutes in this case.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#126
Well, fact 2 is in dispute	MrBig	Mar 2012	#128
Figure that, the cold blooded killer doesn't want to paint himself as a cold blooded killer.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#129
That does mean it is a disputed fact	MrBig	Mar 2012	#134
Enough facts are known for Zimmerman to be in jail awaiting a murder one charge.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#139
I pretty much agree	MrBig	Mar 2012	#149
Also undisputed	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#232
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#208
Really? Because we think he should have been arrested (and his gun confiscated for inspection?)	hlthe2b	Mar 2012	#9
I am all for an arrest and investigation. I am not for "guilty before proven so".	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#58
That's all that people here have been asking for.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#112
no one here is stalking George Zimmerman with a loaded weapon.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#209
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#222
Trayvon was.	Solomon	Mar 2012	#307
What the fuck are you writing about?	bluestate10	Mar 2012	#10
i think folks want the process of justice to move forward...accused, arrested, trial...etc.	spanone	Mar 2012	#11
Seems you should ask that of G Zimmerman as far as the value of Mr Martin's innocence is concerned.	Jumping John	Mar 2012	#12
So we don't need a trial or jury then huh ...as you said...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#19
Very poor reading skills, he didn't say that at all.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#113
Irony still escapes you.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#153
please provide a link showing anyone saying that zimmerman should be hung, sans trial--	niyad	Mar 2012	#16
Well that would be nice except for that it seems many are using this to go off on an anti gun rant.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#24
ah, since your original statement has been successfully challenged, you are switching themes?	niyad	Mar 2012	#35
"successfully challenged" LOL	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#76
No, it's evidence of your piss poor logic skills.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#114
...and your "mob" logic is not a piss poor skill?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#147
Attack others and then play the victim	MattBaggins	Mar 2012	#150
Reframe much?	.99center	Mar 2012	#87
Not at all. Rather it is you who are trying to reframe. Nice try though.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#96
No, it was you who said that people are using this tragedy to try to hang Zimmerman.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#115
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#154
Probably 95 times out of 100 I would agree with you.	TheWraith	Mar 2012	#17
WRONG.	USArmyParatrooper	Mar 2012	#21
Normally anyone using a gun in Florida for self defense will be arrested until enough is known.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#29
NOW you get it.	Booster	Mar 2012	#90
Now?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#95
"Small, skinny kid". A correction	shadowrider	Mar 2012	#101
140 lbs and 6'3" is undoubtedly skinny.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#116
Read again. He weighed more than 140.	shadowrider	Mar 2012	#121
Every report that I've read said he weighed 140 lbs.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#125
the police report says 160	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#188
At least some of us agree.	Zanzoobar	Mar 2012	#23
Since Zmann put a bullet first rather than speaking to the kid...	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#26
Certainly ...but I have been seeing a lot of mob mentallity going on here and other places.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#31
I wouldn't blame people for being this upset. Easy to take it lightly...	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#41
The rule of law is nothing to take lightly ...the cops seem to have messed up on this one.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#78
The problem here is that the Internet/media are much quicker/slappier than our	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#86
The original question is "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#179
Like the NRA?	.99center	Mar 2012	#70
Reframe much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#79
your message is bullshit.	Warren Stupidity	Mar 2012	#27
Your observation is looking thru bull shit. Apparently you are not seeing the mob mentallity...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#36
I would settle for an arrest.	unapatriciated	Mar 2012	#28
So would I. I only have a problem with the mob finding him guilty before a trial.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#84
Silly you, you're not aware that a mob won't be deciding his fate.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#117
Maybe you should teach her why trials have to be moved to another local.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#146
I assume you mean 'locale', given that 'local' is an adjective?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#148
You've made your point ...you have found him guilty without a trial.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#155
How about just having a trial?	DCBob	Mar 2012	#30
...and that relates to the question how?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#233
You clearly arent comprehending the issue.	DCBob	Mar 2012	#238
You clearly missed the actual question I originally asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#318
you're shooting your mouth off, but you are utterly ignorant of the basic facts of the story	Enrique	Mar 2012	#33
Maybe you haven't noticed the mob mentallity ...I can't help you see it.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#37
The mob mentallity is typical here	johnnie	Mar 2012	#57
LOL ...even a jury could see that.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#59
The argument of the OP is classic "turn the tables" bullshit. nt	Warren Stupidity	Mar 2012	#44
...and your argument is what? ...we don''t need a court of law to find Zim guilty? Nice!	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#49
Nope	guitar man	Mar 2012	#34
So do I.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#38
Yes, people are really, really angry.	EFerrari	Mar 2012	#39
The self admitted KILLER has not even been arrested!	workinclasszero	Mar 2012	#40
The "world" is not the judge and jury. I'm for an arrest at the least.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#55
Innocent until proven guilty is a legal, courtroom standard	bluestateguy	Mar 2012	#42
We want him arrested	Marrah_G	Mar 2012	#47
Of course I do ...like any other person that fires a gun for any reason in Florida.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#50
you thought he was arrested didn't you	Enrique	Mar 2012	#56
You could spend all day here reading into things and trying to reframe couldn't you.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#63
that sounds like an apology	Enrique	Mar 2012	#65
You must be smoking something.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#72
Everyone knows that you're fully ignorant of this subject.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#118
and you have totally ignored the original question and have gone off on a knee jerk reaction and...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#156
I find your posts disruptive and offensive EOTE.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#197
I want a real investigation...	cynatnite	Mar 2012	#48
I want him arrested too. I know if I used my gun I would be arrested until the facts are known.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#62
actually a trial would be nice	arely staircase	Mar 2012	#51
Yeah, just a basic criminal investigation and trial would be nice.	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#60
"police wanted to simply pat Zimmerman on the back for killing an n***"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#64
So why do you think the Sanford police was so lackadaisical?	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#92
I agree. The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#157
I agree there - everybody has the right to due process.	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#166
"they always get away with it"	unionworks	Mar 2012	#66
Well, I certainly agree with innocent before proven guilty and I agree	liberalhistorian	Mar 2012	#67
IMO the "stand your ground" law is meant to be applied when confronting a criminal in your own home.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#82
Yeah, and we all know how much your opinion counts in these matters. NT	EOTE	Mar 2012	#120
Yep ...it is a discussion board ...even though you'd rather turn it into snipe.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#130
You've been sniping from the get go.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#132
You obviously aren't interested in any kind of discussion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#138
Says the person who thinks that demanding justice where there is none	EOTE	Mar 2012	#141
LOL ...and you have yet to actually adress the original question but have devolved into insults.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#159
best post in this thread nt	barbtries	Mar 2012	#110
yes I do	CatWoman	Mar 2012	#73
I wouldn't say a lot of people, but I'd say this person does...	Hippo_Tron	Mar 2012	#74
I am not a court of law. I can and will say whatever the hell I want.	2ndAmForComputers	Mar 2012	#77
No one has said you can't say what you want. If anything a lot of people object...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#81
What you're talking about here isn't really about this case at all	RZM	Mar 2012	#83
Agree'd.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#85
if the races were reversed	unionworks	Mar 2012	#89
Exactly.	Lilyeye	Mar 2012	#99
Except Zimmerman wasn't a white man n/t	MrBig	Mar 2012	#124
Indeed. It kind of invalidates the reframing going on ...trying to make it a B/W race thing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#187
most of the 49 times	unionworks	Mar 2012	#213
Exactly	MrBig	Mar 2012	#235
I agree	MrBig	Mar 2012	#236
Nice reframe. Was there anymore "bullshit" you wanted to say or would you accually like to ...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#178
you are taking	unionworks	Mar 2012	#214
Were you going to address the question or go off on a rant about something else?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#217
I am not so sure that is a fair accusation.	ZombieHorde	Mar 2012	#91
From what I have seen it looks like a large amount of people have already found him guilty.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#162
"What scares me more is the possibility that someone innocent can be found guilty and executed."	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#215
More reframing ...nice. So you don't care if someone on death row is innocent.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#218
reframing?	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#220
More reframing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#227
you claim to want discussion,	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#243
You are obviously not in this for a discussion on the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#263
What are the issues that aren't being addressed? I can read	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#268
Hung? no. It'd be nice if they'd arrest or charge him.	Chan790	Mar 2012	#94
No, looks like a lot of people just want justice for a kid being dead.	Lilyeye	Mar 2012	#98
The op title was a statement ...the question is below.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#226
FAIL. Gigantic fail.	cali	Mar 2012	#100
You FAILED to answer the questrion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#160
your own question presumes guilt	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#163
That's called a "statement" and it is my opinion and this is a place where...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#169
yes, I've posted it-	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#191
I see that you already have decided what Zim did. So I take it you are fine with...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#198
no, Zimmerman himself said he shot Trayvon.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#207
I'm not interested in a discussion on anything other than the question that I asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#219
Was someone arrested?	mmonk	Mar 2012	#104
This message was self-deleted by its author	LanternWaste	Mar 2012	#105
I think you are confusing legal application and sentiment	LanternWaste	Mar 2012	#106
So, after being stalked and confronted, did this kid have a right to STAND HIS GROUND, if that	mfcorey1	Mar 2012	#108
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#224
how about an ARREST?	barbtries	Mar 2012	#109
How about you have a discussion over the original question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#225
Wrong!	Wind Dancer	Mar 2012	#119
No, it doesn't.	Iggo	Mar 2012	#122
Ahh the old broad brush...	trumad	Mar 2012	#127
...and are you adressing the original question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#161
gunz-uh	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#137
Ayup. The denizens of the Gungeoun are in a panic.	Ikonoklast	Mar 2012	#278
what trial? he hasn't even been arrested?	WI_DEM	Mar 2012	#140
No. Vigilante "justice" is not our schtick. Not everyone thinks like GZ	PotatoChip	Mar 2012	#151
Other than that ...did you want to discuss issues involving the question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#229
looks like you think you can speak for others- as for me, I believe Zimmerman deserves a trial...	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#158
not when there's incontrovertible proof	elana i am	Mar 2012	#164
original question: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#176
The Florida police decided that Zimmerman was SO innocent, that they did no investigation	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#165
They would have to prove or have evidence that Zim was not in fear for his life.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#171
You almost get it right, then fail.	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#228
Instead of reframing how about we accually discuss things concerning the question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#230
Our court system does not get involved when the police decide that the guy holding the	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#247
An arrest was not part of the op. The question is. So how would you like to be on trial...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#329
You still seem confused ... DU is not the US judicial system.	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#346
What I want is SCOTUS to overturn these horrible stand your ground laws.	Initech	Mar 2012	#167
The intent of the SYG law is so that a home owner does not have to be backed into a corner...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#173
You're confused	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#189
I am? The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#195
Yes	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#202
Whatever ...if you want to find someone guilty before an arrest and trial that's your thing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#221
WTF? Where did I say anything of the sort?	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#234
I think you'll find most DUers wanted him arrested, not executed on site.	Bruce Wayne	Mar 2012	#190
But I can imagine the law will be interpreted very differently in the trial.	Initech	Mar 2012	#200
an excellent question to pose to George Zimmerman at his trial for murder.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#168
well said	renate	Mar 2012	#183
Not in this case..	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#180
Yes. I do want to hang George Zimmerman right now. Actually, I want to imprison him forever.	DisgustipatedinCA	Mar 2012	#192
ohreally? I haven't seen a single post stating that. Link?	yardwork	Mar 2012	#194
The question "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" doesn't need a link.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#199
THIS is why we need the unrec button...nt	joeybee12	Mar 2012	#203
Yes, we need to discourage and eliminate ALL personal observations...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#205
The OP was neither productive or logical...	joeybee12	Mar 2012	#210
Well thank you for clarifying what my perceptions should be.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#212
we see through the BS... sorry	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#240
I would like you to elaborate what you mean.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#242
Crickets...as I expected.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#244
With over 200 replies in this thread, you're the only one defending the OP	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#237
Have you READ the replies?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#239
You certainly know a thing or two about projection.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#246
I'm calling this thread, or what it has become, exactly what it is.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#249
More crickets...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#245
Yes, your responses have been embarrassing.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#248
WHAT? What did you just say?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#250
I don't believe for a minute that you have read this thread or my posts on it.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#251
I don't know	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#255
No, you don't get to play that card... too vague.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#257
Nary of the plenty are here backing you up	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#260
Not to worry- they will.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#269
Very humorous	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#288
Oh really? You are not keeping up SOG.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#289
So you like being part of the mob huh and because it is a majority it must be right too?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#281
Yes	Aerows	Mar 2012	#211
Trial? There are people put on trial for crimes?	just1voice	Mar 2012	#216
EPIC FAIL.	Rex	Mar 2012	#241
The EPIC FAIL is your knee jerk reaction and failure to respond to the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#261
No you failed miserably, the fact that you don't see it in your own thread	Rex	Mar 2012	#344
Wow...look at all these posts.	The Midway Rebel	Mar 2012	#252
Are you calling the OP a troll?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#254
This post was hidden by jury decision.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#256
And WHAT, exactly, do you mean by that? Are YOU calling ME a troll?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#258
You've certainly accumulated plenty of rope in this thread.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#259
And you have YET to back up any of your insinuations about me.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#262
Back up?	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#265
I can attest that "BeHereNow" is NOT a troll.	William769	Mar 2012	#279
Thank you William...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#282
BHN is not a troll	Marrah_G	Mar 2012	#333
Son of Gob - I have never seen you or your user id	truedelphi	Mar 2012	#343
Don't be silly,	elleng	Mar 2012	#276
Thanks Ellen...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#283
Read this thread	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#292
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#317
careful there, Sonny	Whisp	Mar 2012	#293
Read the thread	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#295
Thanks Whisp...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#313
People can disagree without being trolls, Son of Gob.	ScreamingMeemie	Mar 2012	#302
Someone is a troll, AND they have a partner, because they have a POV YOU do not agree with?	sabrina 1	Mar 2012	#270
Very few have accually wanted to discuss issues involving the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#273
First, I didn't call anyone a Troll, so save it.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#277
Well, that's an assumption. I am not a mind reader so I have to take the OP at face value.	sabrina 1	Mar 2012	#308
Thank you for reflecting the standard a good discussion board should have.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#332
For a newbie that is some nerve	nadinbrzezinski	Mar 2012	#274
What charges?	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#280
In your imagination	nadinbrzezinski	Mar 2012	#286
That is not true at all	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#290
So NOW, you are backing off of your insinuations about me?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#298
You're really proving the point on everything I've said in this thread.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#301
Everything you've said has nothing to do with the original question I asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#319
+1 Nadin...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#304
Thanks Nadin...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#294
If you are calling BHN a troll I would like to know where you have gotten	Grateful for Hope	Mar 2012	#296
Read the thread before joining the pile up	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#299
SOG was thinking his insinuations about me and Loon would go unnoticed by our community.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#300
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#323
...and what does that have to do with the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#264
Obvious Troll is Obvious	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#253
I guess you are incapable of discussing issues involving the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#266
No	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#267
And your vast experience and years on DU lead you to believe so?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#271
No, but RL and numerous others seem to agree	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#272
Apparently your mob rules. I'd rather be on a lonely island than stand with those...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#275
This is a message board, not the US court system	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#284
This post was hidden by jury decision.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#315
Did Trayvon	unionworks	Mar 2012	#297
How would you like to have the US court system presum you to be guilty before you can prove...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#321
the poster IS discussing the original question.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#335
This post was hidden by jury decision.	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#310
Irony evades you ...you have nothing to discuss pertaining to the question originally asked...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#316
...	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#338
loon	got root	Mar 2012	#285
Sawp?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#320
Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial	Herlong	Mar 2012	#287
ah, but he doesn't matter	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#291
Only if the accused is a minority.	sikorsky	Mar 2012	#303
poor poor whites... as a white man, you embarrass me	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#341
Seriously, the blood thirst on this thread is fucked up	johnnie	Mar 2012	#305
Sure.	Broderick	Mar 2012	#306
Who was Treyvon's judge for the crime of walking to the store? Zimmerman!	workinclasszero	Mar 2012	#309
Another one who doesn't respond to the original question ...thanks for adding to the discussion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#330
4772 views, 310 replies, only 3 sad recs	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#311
Ah so DU is nothing but a rec contest to you ...instead of it being a discussion board.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#322
is this an example of what you consider to be good 'discussion'?	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#326
You should ask the member that is into rec counts.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#328
I asked you-	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#331
This message was self-deleted by its author	HangOnKids	Mar 2012	#334
Obvious Troll is afraid of bad words?	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#339
Oh, I'll wait for a trial.	varelse	Mar 2012	#312
Your thread has convinced me I should say...	MrMickeysMom	Mar 2012	#324
This thread is an example...	Oilwellian	Mar 2012	#337
Of course he deserves a trial.	AngryOldDem	Mar 2012	#342

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.