Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Whatcha talking about? Kalidurga Mar 2012 #1
No, I think people only want to ARREST him not "hang" him. nt nanabugg Mar 2012 #97
So you don't think Zimmerman put that bullet in an unarmed kid? CakeGrrl Mar 2012 #2
So you don't need a trial to decide who did what? L0oniX Mar 2012 #4
LOonix you lose this argument. Bicoastal Mar 2012 #14
"argumnet"? L0oniX Mar 2012 #43
Yes, we need a stinking trial and I explicitly said so. You're being obtuse. nt Bicoastal Mar 2012 #45
You troll .99center Mar 2012 #52
"You troll?" Are you kidding me? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #172
Sure .99center Mar 2012 #327
Did I miss something? Has Zimmerman been arrested and charged? Booster Mar 2012 #75
Not very bright are you? EOTE Mar 2012 #102
I'm sure you and the mob that you are part of would just go ahead and hang him now. L0oniX Mar 2012 #131
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #134
You obviously can't carry on a decent discusion but have decended into... L0oniX Mar 2012 #142
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #143
Just did jury for an alert on your post L0oniX... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #170
Indeed ...the "ridiculous responses" IMO are indicative of a mob mentality... L0oniX Mar 2012 #175
I'll go you one further... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #177
Thanks for your thoughtful responces. L0oniX Mar 2012 #182
Well, I don't know how much thought is required to see that BeHereNow Mar 2012 #186
Unfortunatly this sort of thing is driving people away from DU. L0oniX Mar 2012 #193
WOW. People tell you how wrong you are and it is a MOB!? Rex Mar 2012 #345
no, in George Zimmerman's world, there is no need for a trial, or even Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #196
and ye shall know them by their spelling elehhhhna Mar 2012 #340
If he'd been black and Trayvon white, you'd better believe liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #68
That's a bit reframing as the question is: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore? L0oniX Mar 2012 #185
So you don't need Zimmerman in custody or questioned for the trial? .99center Mar 2012 #15
Is that what I said? Troll much? L0oniX Mar 2012 #53
It's an honest question .99center Mar 2012 #69
No, that would be you. EOTE Mar 2012 #103
The irony of what you have said escapes you entirely. L0oniX Mar 2012 #133
I'm quite sure you don't know what irony is. EOTE Mar 2012 #136
You can see the foolish in all the insults you've thrown at me... L0oniX Mar 2012 #144
You know, the internet has tons of information available for you. EOTE Mar 2012 #145
I asked a question. "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #152
Frankly, I am amazed that more posts on this thread have not been hidden... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #181
Where and when did the OP say that? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #174
No where in the OP .99center Mar 2012 #314
What "muddies" the case is the mob hearsay, the media pile on and the injection of the race card. L0oniX Mar 2012 #325
Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore? .99center Mar 2012 #336
The point is there was going to be NO further investigation. savalez Mar 2012 #18
Nothing wrong with justice as long as it comes from a court of law and not... L0oniX Mar 2012 #46
You think maybe someone should've said that to Zimmerman? jaded_old_cynic Mar 2012 #80
Martin: Unarmed and shot dead. Zimmerman: Shooter. CakeGrrl Mar 2012 #22
Do we put someone in jail because the public thinks he's guilty? Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #25
No. We conduct a PROPER investigation, arrest suspects, and put them on trial kestrel91316 Mar 2012 #32
Ding Ding Ding ...someone gets it. L0oniX Mar 2012 #54
Well, you certainly don't get it. Read that post again - none of that was done. Booster Mar 2012 #88
Ding,Ding,Ding, butterfly77 Mar 2012 #184
Your "ass" as you put it has not addressed the question. L0oniX Mar 2012 #201
Only if you have... butterfly77 Mar 2012 #204
So now I am saying Zim is innocent? WOW Put words into peoples mouths much? L0oniX Mar 2012 #206
Exactly. Mojorabbit Mar 2012 #61
First, there needs to be a full investigation, and an indictment handed down. Honeycombe8 Mar 2012 #107
You're busting the narrative here slackmaster Mar 2012 #71
Droning unarmed kids is no better. girl gone mad Mar 2012 #223
Not pertaining to the op question but ...add the soldier who killed 16 Afgans. L0oniX Mar 2012 #231
Who? RobertEarl Mar 2012 #3
we all want him arrested Enrique Mar 2012 #5
Net nanny much? L0oniX Mar 2012 #8
No, I want to see him arrested now rather than wait for the authorities in FL to lose interest. Bicoastal Mar 2012 #6
That is not what it looks like to me. Control-Z Mar 2012 #7
"innocent" So you have all the facts then ...right? L0oniX Mar 2012 #13
Yep. Control-Z Mar 2012 #20
Well LooniX, that has been the problem Oilwellian Mar 2012 #93
Yes, are you really so daft as to not realize this? EOTE Mar 2012 #111
I think the OP's point is MrBig Mar 2012 #123
There are plenty of absolutes in this case. EOTE Mar 2012 #126
Well, fact 2 is in dispute MrBig Mar 2012 #128
Figure that, the cold blooded killer doesn't want to paint himself as a cold blooded killer. EOTE Mar 2012 #129
That does mean it is a disputed fact MrBig Mar 2012 #134
Enough facts are known for Zimmerman to be in jail awaiting a murder one charge. EOTE Mar 2012 #139
I pretty much agree MrBig Mar 2012 #149
Also undisputed Son of Gob Mar 2012 #232
+1 L0oniX Mar 2012 #208
Really? Because we think he should have been arrested (and his gun confiscated for inspection?) hlthe2b Mar 2012 #9
I am all for an arrest and investigation. I am not for "guilty before proven so". L0oniX Mar 2012 #58
That's all that people here have been asking for. EOTE Mar 2012 #112
no one here is stalking George Zimmerman with a loaded weapon. Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #209
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #222
Trayvon was. Solomon Mar 2012 #307
What the fuck are you writing about? bluestate10 Mar 2012 #10
i think folks want the process of justice to move forward...accused, arrested, trial...etc. spanone Mar 2012 #11
Seems you should ask that of G Zimmerman as far as the value of Mr Martin's innocence is concerned. Jumping John Mar 2012 #12
So we don't need a trial or jury then huh ...as you said... L0oniX Mar 2012 #19
Very poor reading skills, he didn't say that at all. EOTE Mar 2012 #113
Irony still escapes you. L0oniX Mar 2012 #153
please provide a link showing anyone saying that zimmerman should be hung, sans trial-- niyad Mar 2012 #16
Well that would be nice except for that it seems many are using this to go off on an anti gun rant. L0oniX Mar 2012 #24
ah, since your original statement has been successfully challenged, you are switching themes? niyad Mar 2012 #35
"successfully challenged" LOL L0oniX Mar 2012 #76
No, it's evidence of your piss poor logic skills. EOTE Mar 2012 #114
...and your "mob" logic is not a piss poor skill? L0oniX Mar 2012 #147
Attack others and then play the victim MattBaggins Mar 2012 #150
Reframe much? .99center Mar 2012 #87
Not at all. Rather it is you who are trying to reframe. Nice try though. L0oniX Mar 2012 #96
No, it was you who said that people are using this tragedy to try to hang Zimmerman. EOTE Mar 2012 #115
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #154
Probably 95 times out of 100 I would agree with you. TheWraith Mar 2012 #17
WRONG. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #21
Normally anyone using a gun in Florida for self defense will be arrested until enough is known. L0oniX Mar 2012 #29
NOW you get it. Booster Mar 2012 #90
Now? L0oniX Mar 2012 #95
"Small, skinny kid". A correction shadowrider Mar 2012 #101
140 lbs and 6'3" is undoubtedly skinny. EOTE Mar 2012 #116
Read again. He weighed more than 140. shadowrider Mar 2012 #121
Every report that I've read said he weighed 140 lbs. EOTE Mar 2012 #125
the police report says 160 pokerfan Mar 2012 #188
At least some of us agree. Zanzoobar Mar 2012 #23
Since Zmann put a bullet first rather than speaking to the kid... Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #26
Certainly ...but I have been seeing a lot of mob mentallity going on here and other places. L0oniX Mar 2012 #31
I wouldn't blame people for being this upset. Easy to take it lightly... Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #41
The rule of law is nothing to take lightly ...the cops seem to have messed up on this one. L0oniX Mar 2012 #78
The problem here is that the Internet/media are much quicker/slappier than our Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #86
The original question is "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #179
Like the NRA? .99center Mar 2012 #70
Reframe much? L0oniX Mar 2012 #79
your message is bullshit. Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #27
Your observation is looking thru bull shit. Apparently you are not seeing the mob mentallity... L0oniX Mar 2012 #36
I would settle for an arrest. unapatriciated Mar 2012 #28
So would I. I only have a problem with the mob finding him guilty before a trial. L0oniX Mar 2012 #84
Silly you, you're not aware that a mob won't be deciding his fate. EOTE Mar 2012 #117
Maybe you should teach her why trials have to be moved to another local. L0oniX Mar 2012 #146
I assume you mean 'locale', given that 'local' is an adjective? EOTE Mar 2012 #148
You've made your point ...you have found him guilty without a trial. L0oniX Mar 2012 #155
How about just having a trial? DCBob Mar 2012 #30
...and that relates to the question how? L0oniX Mar 2012 #233
You clearly arent comprehending the issue. DCBob Mar 2012 #238
You clearly missed the actual question I originally asked. L0oniX Mar 2012 #318
you're shooting your mouth off, but you are utterly ignorant of the basic facts of the story Enrique Mar 2012 #33
Maybe you haven't noticed the mob mentallity ...I can't help you see it. L0oniX Mar 2012 #37
The mob mentallity is typical here johnnie Mar 2012 #57
LOL ...even a jury could see that. L0oniX Mar 2012 #59
The argument of the OP is classic "turn the tables" bullshit. nt Warren Stupidity Mar 2012 #44
...and your argument is what? ...we don''t need a court of law to find Zim guilty? Nice! L0oniX Mar 2012 #49
Nope guitar man Mar 2012 #34
So do I. L0oniX Mar 2012 #38
Yes, people are really, really angry. EFerrari Mar 2012 #39
The self admitted KILLER has not even been arrested! workinclasszero Mar 2012 #40
The "world" is not the judge and jury. I'm for an arrest at the least. L0oniX Mar 2012 #55
Innocent until proven guilty is a legal, courtroom standard bluestateguy Mar 2012 #42
We want him arrested Marrah_G Mar 2012 #47
Of course I do ...like any other person that fires a gun for any reason in Florida. L0oniX Mar 2012 #50
you thought he was arrested didn't you Enrique Mar 2012 #56
You could spend all day here reading into things and trying to reframe couldn't you. L0oniX Mar 2012 #63
that sounds like an apology Enrique Mar 2012 #65
You must be smoking something. L0oniX Mar 2012 #72
Everyone knows that you're fully ignorant of this subject. EOTE Mar 2012 #118
and you have totally ignored the original question and have gone off on a knee jerk reaction and... L0oniX Mar 2012 #156
I find your posts disruptive and offensive EOTE. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #197
I want a real investigation... cynatnite Mar 2012 #48
I want him arrested too. I know if I used my gun I would be arrested until the facts are known. L0oniX Mar 2012 #62
actually a trial would be nice arely staircase Mar 2012 #51
Yeah, just a basic criminal investigation and trial would be nice. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #60
"police wanted to simply pat Zimmerman on the back for killing an n***" L0oniX Mar 2012 #64
So why do you think the Sanford police was so lackadaisical? backscatter712 Mar 2012 #92
I agree. The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #157
I agree there - everybody has the right to due process. backscatter712 Mar 2012 #166
"they always get away with it" unionworks Mar 2012 #66
Well, I certainly agree with innocent before proven guilty and I agree liberalhistorian Mar 2012 #67
IMO the "stand your ground" law is meant to be applied when confronting a criminal in your own home. L0oniX Mar 2012 #82
Yeah, and we all know how much your opinion counts in these matters. NT EOTE Mar 2012 #120
Yep ...it is a discussion board ...even though you'd rather turn it into snipe. L0oniX Mar 2012 #130
You've been sniping from the get go. EOTE Mar 2012 #132
You obviously aren't interested in any kind of discussion... L0oniX Mar 2012 #138
Says the person who thinks that demanding justice where there is none EOTE Mar 2012 #141
LOL ...and you have yet to actually adress the original question but have devolved into insults. L0oniX Mar 2012 #159
best post in this thread nt barbtries Mar 2012 #110
yes I do CatWoman Mar 2012 #73
I wouldn't say a lot of people, but I'd say this person does... Hippo_Tron Mar 2012 #74
I am not a court of law. I can and will say whatever the hell I want. 2ndAmForComputers Mar 2012 #77
No one has said you can't say what you want. If anything a lot of people object... L0oniX Mar 2012 #81
What you're talking about here isn't really about this case at all RZM Mar 2012 #83
Agree'd. L0oniX Mar 2012 #85
if the races were reversed unionworks Mar 2012 #89
Exactly. Lilyeye Mar 2012 #99
Except Zimmerman wasn't a white man n/t MrBig Mar 2012 #124
Indeed. It kind of invalidates the reframing going on ...trying to make it a B/W race thing. L0oniX Mar 2012 #187
most of the 49 times unionworks Mar 2012 #213
Exactly MrBig Mar 2012 #235
I agree MrBig Mar 2012 #236
Nice reframe. Was there anymore "bullshit" you wanted to say or would you accually like to ... L0oniX Mar 2012 #178
you are taking unionworks Mar 2012 #214
Were you going to address the question or go off on a rant about something else? L0oniX Mar 2012 #217
I am not so sure that is a fair accusation. ZombieHorde Mar 2012 #91
From what I have seen it looks like a large amount of people have already found him guilty. L0oniX Mar 2012 #162
"What scares me more is the possibility that someone innocent can be found guilty and executed." Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #215
More reframing ...nice. So you don't care if someone on death row is innocent. L0oniX Mar 2012 #218
reframing? Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #220
More reframing. L0oniX Mar 2012 #227
you claim to want discussion, Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #243
You are obviously not in this for a discussion on the question. L0oniX Mar 2012 #263
What are the issues that aren't being addressed? I can read Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #268
Hung? no. It'd be nice if they'd arrest or charge him. Chan790 Mar 2012 #94
No, looks like a lot of people just want justice for a kid being dead. Lilyeye Mar 2012 #98
The op title was a statement ...the question is below. L0oniX Mar 2012 #226
FAIL. Gigantic fail. cali Mar 2012 #100
You FAILED to answer the questrion... L0oniX Mar 2012 #160
your own question presumes guilt Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #163
That's called a "statement" and it is my opinion and this is a place where... L0oniX Mar 2012 #169
yes, I've posted it- Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #191
I see that you already have decided what Zim did. So I take it you are fine with... L0oniX Mar 2012 #198
no, Zimmerman himself said he shot Trayvon. Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #207
I'm not interested in a discussion on anything other than the question that I asked. L0oniX Mar 2012 #219
Was someone arrested? mmonk Mar 2012 #104
This message was self-deleted by its author LanternWaste Mar 2012 #105
I think you are confusing legal application and sentiment LanternWaste Mar 2012 #106
So, after being stalked and confronted, did this kid have a right to STAND HIS GROUND, if that mfcorey1 Mar 2012 #108
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #224
how about an ARREST? barbtries Mar 2012 #109
How about you have a discussion over the original question? L0oniX Mar 2012 #225
Wrong! Wind Dancer Mar 2012 #119
No, it doesn't. Iggo Mar 2012 #122
Ahh the old broad brush... trumad Mar 2012 #127
...and are you adressing the original question? L0oniX Mar 2012 #161
gunz-uh fascisthunter Mar 2012 #137
Ayup. The denizens of the Gungeoun are in a panic. Ikonoklast Mar 2012 #278
what trial? he hasn't even been arrested? WI_DEM Mar 2012 #140
No. Vigilante "justice" is not our schtick. Not everyone thinks like GZ PotatoChip Mar 2012 #151
Other than that ...did you want to discuss issues involving the question? L0oniX Mar 2012 #229
looks like you think you can speak for others- as for me, I believe Zimmerman deserves a trial... Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #158
not when there's incontrovertible proof elana i am Mar 2012 #164
original question: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore? L0oniX Mar 2012 #176
The Florida police decided that Zimmerman was SO innocent, that they did no investigation JoePhilly Mar 2012 #165
They would have to prove or have evidence that Zim was not in fear for his life. L0oniX Mar 2012 #171
You almost get it right, then fail. JoePhilly Mar 2012 #228
Instead of reframing how about we accually discuss things concerning the question? L0oniX Mar 2012 #230
Our court system does not get involved when the police decide that the guy holding the JoePhilly Mar 2012 #247
An arrest was not part of the op. The question is. So how would you like to be on trial... L0oniX Mar 2012 #329
You still seem confused ... DU is not the US judicial system. JoePhilly Mar 2012 #346
What I want is SCOTUS to overturn these horrible stand your ground laws. Initech Mar 2012 #167
The intent of the SYG law is so that a home owner does not have to be backed into a corner... L0oniX Mar 2012 #173
You're confused pokerfan Mar 2012 #189
I am? The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" L0oniX Mar 2012 #195
Yes pokerfan Mar 2012 #202
Whatever ...if you want to find someone guilty before an arrest and trial that's your thing. L0oniX Mar 2012 #221
WTF? Where did I say anything of the sort? pokerfan Mar 2012 #234
I think you'll find most DUers wanted him arrested, not executed on site. Bruce Wayne Mar 2012 #190
But I can imagine the law will be interpreted very differently in the trial. Initech Mar 2012 #200
an excellent question to pose to George Zimmerman at his trial for murder. Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #168
well said renate Mar 2012 #183
Not in this case.. butterfly77 Mar 2012 #180
Yes. I do want to hang George Zimmerman right now. Actually, I want to imprison him forever. DisgustipatedinCA Mar 2012 #192
ohreally? I haven't seen a single post stating that. Link? yardwork Mar 2012 #194
The question "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" doesn't need a link. L0oniX Mar 2012 #199
THIS is why we need the unrec button...nt joeybee12 Mar 2012 #203
Yes, we need to discourage and eliminate ALL personal observations... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #205
The OP was neither productive or logical... joeybee12 Mar 2012 #210
Well thank you for clarifying what my perceptions should be. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #212
we see through the BS... sorry fascisthunter Mar 2012 #240
I would like you to elaborate what you mean. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #242
Crickets...as I expected. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #244
With over 200 replies in this thread, you're the only one defending the OP Son of Gob Mar 2012 #237
Have you READ the replies? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #239
You certainly know a thing or two about projection. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #246
I'm calling this thread, or what it has become, exactly what it is. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #249
More crickets... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #245
Yes, your responses have been embarrassing. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #248
WHAT? What did you just say? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #250
I don't believe for a minute that you have read this thread or my posts on it. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #251
I don't know Son of Gob Mar 2012 #255
No, you don't get to play that card... too vague. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #257
Nary of the plenty are here backing you up Son of Gob Mar 2012 #260
Not to worry- they will. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #269
Very humorous Son of Gob Mar 2012 #288
Oh really? You are not keeping up SOG. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #289
So you like being part of the mob huh and because it is a majority it must be right too? L0oniX Mar 2012 #281
Yes Aerows Mar 2012 #211
Trial? There are people put on trial for crimes? just1voice Mar 2012 #216
EPIC FAIL. Rex Mar 2012 #241
The EPIC FAIL is your knee jerk reaction and failure to respond to the question... L0oniX Mar 2012 #261
No you failed miserably, the fact that you don't see it in your own thread Rex Mar 2012 #344
Wow...look at all these posts. The Midway Rebel Mar 2012 #252
Are you calling the OP a troll? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #254
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #256
And WHAT, exactly, do you mean by that? Are YOU calling ME a troll? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #258
You've certainly accumulated plenty of rope in this thread. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #259
And you have YET to back up any of your insinuations about me. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #262
Back up? Son of Gob Mar 2012 #265
I can attest that "BeHereNow" is NOT a troll. William769 Mar 2012 #279
Thank you William... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #282
BHN is not a troll Marrah_G Mar 2012 #333
Son of Gob - I have never seen you or your user id truedelphi Mar 2012 #343
Don't be silly, elleng Mar 2012 #276
Thanks Ellen... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #283
Read this thread Son of Gob Mar 2012 #292
+1 L0oniX Mar 2012 #317
careful there, Sonny Whisp Mar 2012 #293
Read the thread Son of Gob Mar 2012 #295
Thanks Whisp... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #313
People can disagree without being trolls, Son of Gob. ScreamingMeemie Mar 2012 #302
Someone is a troll, AND they have a partner, because they have a POV YOU do not agree with? sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #270
Very few have accually wanted to discuss issues involving the question. L0oniX Mar 2012 #273
First, I didn't call anyone a Troll, so save it. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #277
Well, that's an assumption. I am not a mind reader so I have to take the OP at face value. sabrina 1 Mar 2012 #308
Thank you for reflecting the standard a good discussion board should have. L0oniX Mar 2012 #332
For a newbie that is some nerve nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #274
What charges? Son of Gob Mar 2012 #280
In your imagination nadinbrzezinski Mar 2012 #286
That is not true at all Son of Gob Mar 2012 #290
So NOW, you are backing off of your insinuations about me? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #298
You're really proving the point on everything I've said in this thread. Son of Gob Mar 2012 #301
Everything you've said has nothing to do with the original question I asked. L0oniX Mar 2012 #319
+1 Nadin... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #304
Thanks Nadin... BeHereNow Mar 2012 #294
If you are calling BHN a troll I would like to know where you have gotten Grateful for Hope Mar 2012 #296
Read the thread before joining the pile up Son of Gob Mar 2012 #299
SOG was thinking his insinuations about me and Loon would go unnoticed by our community. BeHereNow Mar 2012 #300
+1 L0oniX Mar 2012 #323
...and what does that have to do with the question... L0oniX Mar 2012 #264
Obvious Troll is Obvious RetroLounge Mar 2012 #253
I guess you are incapable of discussing issues involving the question... L0oniX Mar 2012 #266
No Son of Gob Mar 2012 #267
And your vast experience and years on DU lead you to believe so? BeHereNow Mar 2012 #271
No, but RL and numerous others seem to agree Son of Gob Mar 2012 #272
Apparently your mob rules. I'd rather be on a lonely island than stand with those... L0oniX Mar 2012 #275
This is a message board, not the US court system Son of Gob Mar 2012 #284
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #315
Did Trayvon unionworks Mar 2012 #297
How would you like to have the US court system presum you to be guilty before you can prove... L0oniX Mar 2012 #321
the poster IS discussing the original question. Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #335
Post removed Post removed Mar 2012 #310
Irony evades you ...you have nothing to discuss pertaining to the question originally asked... L0oniX Mar 2012 #316
... RetroLounge Mar 2012 #338
loon got root Mar 2012 #285
Sawp? L0oniX Mar 2012 #320
Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial Herlong Mar 2012 #287
ah, but he doesn't matter Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #291
Only if the accused is a minority. sikorsky Mar 2012 #303
poor poor whites... as a white man, you embarrass me fascisthunter Mar 2012 #341
Seriously, the blood thirst on this thread is fucked up johnnie Mar 2012 #305
Sure. Broderick Mar 2012 #306
Who was Treyvon's judge for the crime of walking to the store? Zimmerman! workinclasszero Mar 2012 #309
Another one who doesn't respond to the original question ...thanks for adding to the discussion... L0oniX Mar 2012 #330
4772 views, 310 replies, only 3 sad recs RetroLounge Mar 2012 #311
Ah so DU is nothing but a rec contest to you ...instead of it being a discussion board. L0oniX Mar 2012 #322
is this an example of what you consider to be good 'discussion'? Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #326
You should ask the member that is into rec counts. L0oniX Mar 2012 #328
I asked you- Bluerthanblue Mar 2012 #331
This message was self-deleted by its author HangOnKids Mar 2012 #334
Obvious Troll is afraid of bad words? RetroLounge Mar 2012 #339
Oh, I'll wait for a trial. varelse Mar 2012 #312
Your thread has convinced me I should say... MrMickeysMom Mar 2012 #324
This thread is an example... Oilwellian Mar 2012 #337
Of course he deserves a trial. AngryOldDem Mar 2012 #342
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Looks like a lot of peopl...»Reply #200