Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
Extremely vague statement tabatha Mar 2012 #1
+1 ProfessorGAC Mar 2012 #2
"warming-alarmist" in the first sentence immediately colours whatever this article is saying... SidDithers Mar 2012 #3
Precisely. n/t ljm2002 Mar 2012 #9
Agreed. mmonk Mar 2012 #12
That's what Bohunk68 Mar 2012 #18
More junk science from denier Lewis Page JBoy Mar 2012 #4
he has quite a record..., G_j Mar 2012 #19
LOL... good lawd fascisthunter Mar 2012 #5
Lewis page also believes pscot Mar 2012 #6
The term "climate change" is vague enough to allow for an ice age. Boojatta Mar 2012 #8
My understanding is that if the Gulf Stream fails hootinholler Mar 2012 #34
How quickly did the warming occur? mmonk Mar 2012 #7
while the author of the article is a bit of a kook... ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #10
The study probably does not say what the reporter/columnist asserts it says Viking12 Mar 2012 #14
The study does claim in the abstract ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #16
"This ikaite record qualitatively supports..." Viking12 Mar 2012 #20
yes...that is why i said IF... ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #21
Nope. No quantitative data at all. Viking12 Mar 2012 #24
so, would it then contradict the other data ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #25
My super-fast reading is that it is in line withing existing proxy analyses back to at least the LIA Viking12 Mar 2012 #26
ahhh, that would 'splain it ProdigalJunkMail Mar 2012 #28
If that story were any more slanted the words would slide right off my screen. nt Codeine Mar 2012 #11
What complete Bunk Bandit Mar 2012 #13
This is about temperature, not carbon dioxide FarCenter Mar 2012 #15
There are numerous methodologies to determine past climate changes. DCBob Mar 2012 #22
The statement that is being contested is the following: FarCenter Mar 2012 #29
The article referenced in the OP does nothing to 'contest' the IPCC Viking12 Mar 2012 #30
The lead researcher was quoted in the Syracuse University release as saying: FarCenter Mar 2012 #32
So? That says NOTHING about your false assertions about the MWP and the IPCC. Viking12 Mar 2012 #33
The Medieval Warm Period was actually cooler than what we considered "normal" temperatures Lydia Leftcoast Mar 2012 #17
I doubt that pre-fossil fuel populations would have influenced climate due to biofuel burning FarCenter Mar 2012 #23
Medieval Bikini Babe... Tikki Mar 2012 #27
It's F'n Lewis Page exagerating - again intaglio Mar 2012 #31
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Medieval warming WAS glob...»Reply #6