General Discussion

Snake Alchemist

(3,318 posts)

40. Wanting evidence to be judged at a trial is a strawman argument? Learn something new every day. nt

Reply to peacebird (Reply #36)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 10:19 PM

Mar 2012

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

65 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Zimmerman: anything less than 1st degree murder is not acceptable [View all] Hugabear Mar 2012 OP

Agree. Anything less than 1st degree murder madaboutharry Mar 2012 #1

Charged or convicted? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #2

Both. - nt Hugabear Mar 2012 #9

Agree! The innocent teenager will spend the rest of his life dead. Lint Head Mar 2012 #3

I guess that everyone has all the evidence they need to convict Zim without a trial. L0oniX Mar 2012 #4

You do get tiresome. We want him arrested and tried for first degree murder. peacebird Mar 2012 #6

And if he is ruled innocent? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #10

Tisk tisk ...we won't let details get in the way of the mob mentallity. L0oniX Mar 2012 #14

Again, you do get tiresome. If you are interested in my response it is posted. peacebird Mar 2012 #22

Then that is the end of it. Obviously. peacebird Mar 2012 #19

Imagine all the money we can save by replacing our current legal system ... spin Mar 2012 #15

Well, it didn't work for the Casey Anthony case... Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #27

Our legal system is far from perfect ... spin Mar 2012 #39

Hell to the 'yes'! Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #44

I'm satisfied FarPoint Mar 2012 #21

I guess my version of being progressive is different than yours. onenote Mar 2012 #43

My progressive posture does have limits. FarPoint Mar 2012 #47

last time I checked people on internet sites can't convict people Johonny Mar 2012 #57

I thought the "fu$@&ng c00ns" was debunked. Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #5

Has that been accepted as evidence in a court of law? L0oniX Mar 2012 #11

Nope... at least 'it is being investigated'. nt Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #13

In the clip I extracted guitar man Mar 2012 #18

I think it was in a TYT video. Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #24

Cenk never said punks. vaberella Mar 2012 #48

Got it. Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #51

Cenk can say what he wants guitar man Mar 2012 #58

You are very wrong. It has NEVER been debunked. n/t vaberella Mar 2012 #26

Regardless of what he said, c--n or punk... Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #37

I agree with you fully on that. vaberella Mar 2012 #41

WHAT?? Three days?? Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #46

Yeah, you didn't know. This is what is killing me about this case. It's in a huffpo article. vaberella Mar 2012 #50

Incompetence in the police force is nothing new to me living here in FL. Lost-in-FL Mar 2012 #54

You can't. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #7

All he has to do is say he was in "fear for his life" and then let the court prove he wasn't. L0oniX Mar 2012 #12

The realistic charge would be USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #16

I agree. He would have to have known when arthritisR_US Mar 2012 #17

Premeditation doesn't require weeks of forethought jmowreader Mar 2012 #55

Not even close. USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #59

Read this... jmowreader Mar 2012 #63

No, it's NOT "beyond a reasonable doubt." USArmyParatrooper Mar 2012 #65

Maybe the DU lawyer contingent could weigh in here RZM Mar 2012 #8

What I want is for someone to do to him what he did. alarimer Mar 2012 #20

What will you do if the grand jury doesn't agree with you? slackmaster Mar 2012 #23

If he is tried and found not guilty then that is the end. We are a nation of laws. peacebird Mar 2012 #29

Thanks peacebird. I don't see an action statement in your answer. slackmaster Mar 2012 #49

I'll be pissed off. Hugabear Mar 2012 #52

Thank you. slackmaster Mar 2012 #56

Agree! workinclasszero Mar 2012 #25

He needs to go to prison for life. Stan Smith Mar 2012 #28

Before the trial or after? nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #30

Well, clearly one gets prison for life only after a trial, right? peacebird Mar 2012 #31

Some seem ready to get the posse together. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #34

And some seem intent on posting strawman arguements on every single thread about Trayvon. peacebird Mar 2012 #36

Wanting evidence to be judged at a trial is a strawman argument? Learn something new every day. nt Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #40

Accusing the rest of us of not wanting a trial... Posting repeatedly that we are all bad evil people peacebird Mar 2012 #42

If you can't see the foaming of the mouth, then there is nothing I can do. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #45

the only foaming at the mouth i see is from you in your desire to accuse good Duers n/t Bodhi BloodWave Mar 2012 #64

Last time I checked, DU wasn't a courtroom Hugabear Mar 2012 #53

Mob rules. L0oniX Mar 2012 #38

After the trial of course. Stan Smith Mar 2012 #32

I think he looks guilty as sin, but I'm going to wait for the trial before calling for sentencing. Snake Alchemist Mar 2012 #33

Since my opinion has no impact on what will happen I feel I can express what I think should happen. Stan Smith Mar 2012 #35

So you can switch your "fair mindedness" on and off like a light switch... is that right? cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #62

Statements like yours get people dismissed from juries post haste. cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #61

"He told the 911 dispatcher... this time he meant to make sure that didn't happen." cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #60