Reply #47

In the discussion thread: Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial. [View all]

Response to L0oniX (Original post)

Thu Mar 22, 2012, 09:02 PM

Marrah_G (22,446 posts)

47. We want him arrested

Don't you?

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum

Replies to this discussion thread

346 replies	Author	Time	Post
Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial. [View all]	L0oniX	Mar 2012	OP
Whatcha talking about?	Kalidurga	Mar 2012	#1
No, I think people only want to ARREST him not "hang" him. nt	nanabugg	Mar 2012	#97
So you don't think Zimmerman put that bullet in an unarmed kid?	CakeGrrl	Mar 2012	#2
So you don't need a trial to decide who did what?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#4
LOonix you lose this argument.	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#14
"argumnet"?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#43
Yes, we need a stinking trial and I explicitly said so. You're being obtuse. nt	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#45
You troll	.99center	Mar 2012	#52
"You troll?" Are you kidding me?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#172
Sure	.99center	Mar 2012	#327
Did I miss something? Has Zimmerman been arrested and charged?	Booster	Mar 2012	#75
Not very bright are you?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#102
I'm sure you and the mob that you are part of would just go ahead and hang him now.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#131
This post was hidden by jury decision.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#134
You obviously can't carry on a decent discusion but have decended into...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#142
This post was hidden by jury decision.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#143
Just did jury for an alert on your post L0oniX...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#170
Indeed ...the "ridiculous responses" IMO are indicative of a mob mentality...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#175
I'll go you one further...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#177
Thanks for your thoughtful responces.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#182
Well, I don't know how much thought is required to see that	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#186
Unfortunatly this sort of thing is driving people away from DU.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#193
WOW. People tell you how wrong you are and it is a MOB!?	Rex	Mar 2012	#345
no, in George Zimmerman's world, there is no need for a trial, or even	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#196
and ye shall know them by their spelling	elehhhhna	Mar 2012	#340
If he'd been black and Trayvon white, you'd better believe	liberalhistorian	Mar 2012	#68
That's a bit reframing as the question is: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#185
So you don't need Zimmerman in custody or questioned for the trial?	.99center	Mar 2012	#15
Is that what I said? Troll much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#53
It's an honest question	.99center	Mar 2012	#69
No, that would be you.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#103
The irony of what you have said escapes you entirely.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#133
I'm quite sure you don't know what irony is.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#136
You can see the foolish in all the insults you've thrown at me...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#144
You know, the internet has tons of information available for you.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#145
I asked a question. "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#152
Frankly, I am amazed that more posts on this thread have not been hidden...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#181
Where and when did the OP say that?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#174
No where in the OP	.99center	Mar 2012	#314
What "muddies" the case is the mob hearsay, the media pile on and the injection of the race card.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#325
Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	.99center	Mar 2012	#336
The point is there was going to be NO further investigation.	savalez	Mar 2012	#18
Nothing wrong with justice as long as it comes from a court of law and not...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#46
You think maybe someone should've said that to Zimmerman?	jaded_old_cynic	Mar 2012	#80
Martin: Unarmed and shot dead. Zimmerman: Shooter.	CakeGrrl	Mar 2012	#22
Do we put someone in jail because the public thinks he's guilty?	Honeycombe8	Mar 2012	#25
No. We conduct a PROPER investigation, arrest suspects, and put them on trial	kestrel91316	Mar 2012	#32
Ding Ding Ding ...someone gets it.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#54
Well, you certainly don't get it. Read that post again - none of that was done.	Booster	Mar 2012	#88
Ding,Ding,Ding,	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#184
Your "ass" as you put it has not addressed the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#201
Only if you have...	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#204
So now I am saying Zim is innocent? WOW Put words into peoples mouths much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#206
Exactly.	Mojorabbit	Mar 2012	#61
First, there needs to be a full investigation, and an indictment handed down.	Honeycombe8	Mar 2012	#107
You're busting the narrative here	slackmaster	Mar 2012	#71
Droning unarmed kids is no better.	girl gone mad	Mar 2012	#223
Not pertaining to the op question but ...add the soldier who killed 16 Afgans.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#231
Who?	RobertEarl	Mar 2012	#3
we all want him arrested	Enrique	Mar 2012	#5
Net nanny much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#8
No, I want to see him arrested now rather than wait for the authorities in FL to lose interest.	Bicoastal	Mar 2012	#6
That is not what it looks like to me.	Control-Z	Mar 2012	#7
"innocent" So you have all the facts then ...right?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#13
Yep.	Control-Z	Mar 2012	#20
Well LooniX, that has been the problem	Oilwellian	Mar 2012	#93
Yes, are you really so daft as to not realize this?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#111
I think the OP's point is	MrBig	Mar 2012	#123
There are plenty of absolutes in this case.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#126
Well, fact 2 is in dispute	MrBig	Mar 2012	#128
Figure that, the cold blooded killer doesn't want to paint himself as a cold blooded killer.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#129
That does mean it is a disputed fact	MrBig	Mar 2012	#134
Enough facts are known for Zimmerman to be in jail awaiting a murder one charge.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#139
I pretty much agree	MrBig	Mar 2012	#149
Also undisputed	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#232
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#208
Really? Because we think he should have been arrested (and his gun confiscated for inspection?)	hlthe2b	Mar 2012	#9
I am all for an arrest and investigation. I am not for "guilty before proven so".	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#58
That's all that people here have been asking for.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#112
no one here is stalking George Zimmerman with a loaded weapon.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#209
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#222
Trayvon was.	Solomon	Mar 2012	#307
What the fuck are you writing about?	bluestate10	Mar 2012	#10
i think folks want the process of justice to move forward...accused, arrested, trial...etc.	spanone	Mar 2012	#11
Seems you should ask that of G Zimmerman as far as the value of Mr Martin's innocence is concerned.	Jumping John	Mar 2012	#12
So we don't need a trial or jury then huh ...as you said...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#19
Very poor reading skills, he didn't say that at all.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#113
Irony still escapes you.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#153
please provide a link showing anyone saying that zimmerman should be hung, sans trial--	niyad	Mar 2012	#16
Well that would be nice except for that it seems many are using this to go off on an anti gun rant.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#24
ah, since your original statement has been successfully challenged, you are switching themes?	niyad	Mar 2012	#35
"successfully challenged" LOL	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#76
No, it's evidence of your piss poor logic skills.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#114
...and your "mob" logic is not a piss poor skill?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#147
Attack others and then play the victim	MattBaggins	Mar 2012	#150
Reframe much?	.99center	Mar 2012	#87
Not at all. Rather it is you who are trying to reframe. Nice try though.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#96
No, it was you who said that people are using this tragedy to try to hang Zimmerman.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#115
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#154
Probably 95 times out of 100 I would agree with you.	TheWraith	Mar 2012	#17
WRONG.	USArmyParatrooper	Mar 2012	#21
Normally anyone using a gun in Florida for self defense will be arrested until enough is known.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#29
NOW you get it.	Booster	Mar 2012	#90
Now?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#95
"Small, skinny kid". A correction	shadowrider	Mar 2012	#101
140 lbs and 6'3" is undoubtedly skinny.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#116
Read again. He weighed more than 140.	shadowrider	Mar 2012	#121
Every report that I've read said he weighed 140 lbs.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#125
the police report says 160	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#188
At least some of us agree.	Zanzoobar	Mar 2012	#23
Since Zmann put a bullet first rather than speaking to the kid...	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#26
Certainly ...but I have been seeing a lot of mob mentallity going on here and other places.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#31
I wouldn't blame people for being this upset. Easy to take it lightly...	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#41
The rule of law is nothing to take lightly ...the cops seem to have messed up on this one.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#78
The problem here is that the Internet/media are much quicker/slappier than our	Lost-in-FL	Mar 2012	#86
The original question is "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#179
Like the NRA?	.99center	Mar 2012	#70
Reframe much?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#79
your message is bullshit.	Warren Stupidity	Mar 2012	#27
Your observation is looking thru bull shit. Apparently you are not seeing the mob mentallity...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#36
I would settle for an arrest.	unapatriciated	Mar 2012	#28
So would I. I only have a problem with the mob finding him guilty before a trial.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#84
Silly you, you're not aware that a mob won't be deciding his fate.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#117
Maybe you should teach her why trials have to be moved to another local.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#146
I assume you mean 'locale', given that 'local' is an adjective?	EOTE	Mar 2012	#148
You've made your point ...you have found him guilty without a trial.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#155
How about just having a trial?	DCBob	Mar 2012	#30
...and that relates to the question how?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#233
You clearly arent comprehending the issue.	DCBob	Mar 2012	#238
You clearly missed the actual question I originally asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#318
you're shooting your mouth off, but you are utterly ignorant of the basic facts of the story	Enrique	Mar 2012	#33
Maybe you haven't noticed the mob mentallity ...I can't help you see it.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#37
The mob mentallity is typical here	johnnie	Mar 2012	#57
LOL ...even a jury could see that.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#59
The argument of the OP is classic "turn the tables" bullshit. nt	Warren Stupidity	Mar 2012	#44
...and your argument is what? ...we don''t need a court of law to find Zim guilty? Nice!	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#49
Nope	guitar man	Mar 2012	#34
So do I.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#38
Yes, people are really, really angry.	EFerrari	Mar 2012	#39
The self admitted KILLER has not even been arrested!	workinclasszero	Mar 2012	#40
The "world" is not the judge and jury. I'm for an arrest at the least.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#55
Innocent until proven guilty is a legal, courtroom standard	bluestateguy	Mar 2012	#42
We want him arrested	Marrah_G	Mar 2012	#47
Of course I do ...like any other person that fires a gun for any reason in Florida.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#50
you thought he was arrested didn't you	Enrique	Mar 2012	#56
You could spend all day here reading into things and trying to reframe couldn't you.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#63
that sounds like an apology	Enrique	Mar 2012	#65
You must be smoking something.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#72
Everyone knows that you're fully ignorant of this subject.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#118
and you have totally ignored the original question and have gone off on a knee jerk reaction and...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#156
I find your posts disruptive and offensive EOTE.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#197
I want a real investigation...	cynatnite	Mar 2012	#48
I want him arrested too. I know if I used my gun I would be arrested until the facts are known.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#62
actually a trial would be nice	arely staircase	Mar 2012	#51
Yeah, just a basic criminal investigation and trial would be nice.	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#60
"police wanted to simply pat Zimmerman on the back for killing an n***"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#64
So why do you think the Sanford police was so lackadaisical?	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#92
I agree. The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#157
I agree there - everybody has the right to due process.	backscatter712	Mar 2012	#166
"they always get away with it"	unionworks	Mar 2012	#66
Well, I certainly agree with innocent before proven guilty and I agree	liberalhistorian	Mar 2012	#67
IMO the "stand your ground" law is meant to be applied when confronting a criminal in your own home.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#82
Yeah, and we all know how much your opinion counts in these matters. NT	EOTE	Mar 2012	#120
Yep ...it is a discussion board ...even though you'd rather turn it into snipe.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#130
You've been sniping from the get go.	EOTE	Mar 2012	#132
You obviously aren't interested in any kind of discussion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#138
Says the person who thinks that demanding justice where there is none	EOTE	Mar 2012	#141
LOL ...and you have yet to actually adress the original question but have devolved into insults.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#159
best post in this thread nt	barbtries	Mar 2012	#110
yes I do	CatWoman	Mar 2012	#73
I wouldn't say a lot of people, but I'd say this person does...	Hippo_Tron	Mar 2012	#74
I am not a court of law. I can and will say whatever the hell I want.	2ndAmForComputers	Mar 2012	#77
No one has said you can't say what you want. If anything a lot of people object...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#81
What you're talking about here isn't really about this case at all	RZM	Mar 2012	#83
Agree'd.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#85
if the races were reversed	unionworks	Mar 2012	#89
Exactly.	Lilyeye	Mar 2012	#99
Except Zimmerman wasn't a white man n/t	MrBig	Mar 2012	#124
Indeed. It kind of invalidates the reframing going on ...trying to make it a B/W race thing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#187
most of the 49 times	unionworks	Mar 2012	#213
Exactly	MrBig	Mar 2012	#235
I agree	MrBig	Mar 2012	#236
Nice reframe. Was there anymore "bullshit" you wanted to say or would you accually like to ...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#178
you are taking	unionworks	Mar 2012	#214
Were you going to address the question or go off on a rant about something else?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#217
I am not so sure that is a fair accusation.	ZombieHorde	Mar 2012	#91
From what I have seen it looks like a large amount of people have already found him guilty.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#162
"What scares me more is the possibility that someone innocent can be found guilty and executed."	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#215
More reframing ...nice. So you don't care if someone on death row is innocent.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#218
reframing?	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#220
More reframing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#227
you claim to want discussion,	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#243
You are obviously not in this for a discussion on the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#263
What are the issues that aren't being addressed? I can read	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#268
Hung? no. It'd be nice if they'd arrest or charge him.	Chan790	Mar 2012	#94
No, looks like a lot of people just want justice for a kid being dead.	Lilyeye	Mar 2012	#98
The op title was a statement ...the question is below.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#226
FAIL. Gigantic fail.	cali	Mar 2012	#100
You FAILED to answer the questrion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#160
your own question presumes guilt	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#163
That's called a "statement" and it is my opinion and this is a place where...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#169
yes, I've posted it-	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#191
I see that you already have decided what Zim did. So I take it you are fine with...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#198
no, Zimmerman himself said he shot Trayvon.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#207
I'm not interested in a discussion on anything other than the question that I asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#219
Was someone arrested?	mmonk	Mar 2012	#104
This message was self-deleted by its author	LanternWaste	Mar 2012	#105
I think you are confusing legal application and sentiment	LanternWaste	Mar 2012	#106
So, after being stalked and confronted, did this kid have a right to STAND HIS GROUND, if that	mfcorey1	Mar 2012	#108
The question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#224
how about an ARREST?	barbtries	Mar 2012	#109
How about you have a discussion over the original question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#225
Wrong!	Wind Dancer	Mar 2012	#119
No, it doesn't.	Iggo	Mar 2012	#122
Ahh the old broad brush...	trumad	Mar 2012	#127
...and are you adressing the original question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#161
gunz-uh	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#137
Ayup. The denizens of the Gungeoun are in a panic.	Ikonoklast	Mar 2012	#278
what trial? he hasn't even been arrested?	WI_DEM	Mar 2012	#140
No. Vigilante "justice" is not our schtick. Not everyone thinks like GZ	PotatoChip	Mar 2012	#151
Other than that ...did you want to discuss issues involving the question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#229
looks like you think you can speak for others- as for me, I believe Zimmerman deserves a trial...	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#158
not when there's incontrovertible proof	elana i am	Mar 2012	#164
original question: Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#176
The Florida police decided that Zimmerman was SO innocent, that they did no investigation	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#165
They would have to prove or have evidence that Zim was not in fear for his life.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#171
You almost get it right, then fail.	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#228
Instead of reframing how about we accually discuss things concerning the question?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#230
Our court system does not get involved when the police decide that the guy holding the	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#247
An arrest was not part of the op. The question is. So how would you like to be on trial...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#329
You still seem confused ... DU is not the US judicial system.	JoePhilly	Mar 2012	#346
What I want is SCOTUS to overturn these horrible stand your ground laws.	Initech	Mar 2012	#167
The intent of the SYG law is so that a home owner does not have to be backed into a corner...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#173
You're confused	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#189
I am? The original question was "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?"	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#195
Yes	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#202
Whatever ...if you want to find someone guilty before an arrest and trial that's your thing.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#221
WTF? Where did I say anything of the sort?	pokerfan	Mar 2012	#234
I think you'll find most DUers wanted him arrested, not executed on site.	Bruce Wayne	Mar 2012	#190
But I can imagine the law will be interpreted very differently in the trial.	Initech	Mar 2012	#200
an excellent question to pose to George Zimmerman at his trial for murder.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#168
well said	renate	Mar 2012	#183
Not in this case..	butterfly77	Mar 2012	#180
Yes. I do want to hang George Zimmerman right now. Actually, I want to imprison him forever.	DisgustipatedinCA	Mar 2012	#192
ohreally? I haven't seen a single post stating that. Link?	yardwork	Mar 2012	#194
The question "Is anyone really innocent before proven guilty anymore?" doesn't need a link.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#199
THIS is why we need the unrec button...nt	joeybee12	Mar 2012	#203
Yes, we need to discourage and eliminate ALL personal observations...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#205
The OP was neither productive or logical...	joeybee12	Mar 2012	#210
Well thank you for clarifying what my perceptions should be.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#212
we see through the BS... sorry	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#240
I would like you to elaborate what you mean.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#242
Crickets...as I expected.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#244
With over 200 replies in this thread, you're the only one defending the OP	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#237
Have you READ the replies?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#239
You certainly know a thing or two about projection.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#246
I'm calling this thread, or what it has become, exactly what it is.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#249
More crickets...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#245
Yes, your responses have been embarrassing.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#248
WHAT? What did you just say?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#250
I don't believe for a minute that you have read this thread or my posts on it.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#251
I don't know	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#255
No, you don't get to play that card... too vague.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#257
Nary of the plenty are here backing you up	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#260
Not to worry- they will.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#269
Very humorous	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#288
Oh really? You are not keeping up SOG.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#289
So you like being part of the mob huh and because it is a majority it must be right too?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#281
Yes	Aerows	Mar 2012	#211
Trial? There are people put on trial for crimes?	just1voice	Mar 2012	#216
EPIC FAIL.	Rex	Mar 2012	#241
The EPIC FAIL is your knee jerk reaction and failure to respond to the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#261
No you failed miserably, the fact that you don't see it in your own thread	Rex	Mar 2012	#344
Wow...look at all these posts.	The Midway Rebel	Mar 2012	#252
Are you calling the OP a troll?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#254
This post was hidden by jury decision.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#256
And WHAT, exactly, do you mean by that? Are YOU calling ME a troll?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#258
You've certainly accumulated plenty of rope in this thread.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#259
And you have YET to back up any of your insinuations about me.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#262
Back up?	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#265
I can attest that "BeHereNow" is NOT a troll.	William769	Mar 2012	#279
Thank you William...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#282
BHN is not a troll	Marrah_G	Mar 2012	#333
Son of Gob - I have never seen you or your user id	truedelphi	Mar 2012	#343
Don't be silly,	elleng	Mar 2012	#276
Thanks Ellen...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#283
Read this thread	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#292
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#317
careful there, Sonny	Whisp	Mar 2012	#293
Read the thread	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#295
Thanks Whisp...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#313
People can disagree without being trolls, Son of Gob.	ScreamingMeemie	Mar 2012	#302
Someone is a troll, AND they have a partner, because they have a POV YOU do not agree with?	sabrina 1	Mar 2012	#270
Very few have accually wanted to discuss issues involving the question.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#273
First, I didn't call anyone a Troll, so save it.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#277
Well, that's an assumption. I am not a mind reader so I have to take the OP at face value.	sabrina 1	Mar 2012	#308
Thank you for reflecting the standard a good discussion board should have.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#332
For a newbie that is some nerve	nadinbrzezinski	Mar 2012	#274
What charges?	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#280
In your imagination	nadinbrzezinski	Mar 2012	#286
That is not true at all	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#290
So NOW, you are backing off of your insinuations about me?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#298
You're really proving the point on everything I've said in this thread.	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#301
Everything you've said has nothing to do with the original question I asked.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#319
+1 Nadin...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#304
Thanks Nadin...	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#294
If you are calling BHN a troll I would like to know where you have gotten	Grateful for Hope	Mar 2012	#296
Read the thread before joining the pile up	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#299
SOG was thinking his insinuations about me and Loon would go unnoticed by our community.	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#300
+1	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#323
...and what does that have to do with the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#264
Obvious Troll is Obvious	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#253
I guess you are incapable of discussing issues involving the question...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#266
No	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#267
And your vast experience and years on DU lead you to believe so?	BeHereNow	Mar 2012	#271
No, but RL and numerous others seem to agree	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#272
Apparently your mob rules. I'd rather be on a lonely island than stand with those...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#275
This is a message board, not the US court system	Son of Gob	Mar 2012	#284
This post was hidden by jury decision.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#315
Did Trayvon	unionworks	Mar 2012	#297
How would you like to have the US court system presum you to be guilty before you can prove...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#321
the poster IS discussing the original question.	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#335
This post was hidden by jury decision.	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#310
Irony evades you ...you have nothing to discuss pertaining to the question originally asked...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#316
...	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#338
loon	got root	Mar 2012	#285
Sawp?	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#320
Looks like a lot of people want to hang him now rather than wait for a trial	Herlong	Mar 2012	#287
ah, but he doesn't matter	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#291
Only if the accused is a minority.	sikorsky	Mar 2012	#303
poor poor whites... as a white man, you embarrass me	fascisthunter	Mar 2012	#341
Seriously, the blood thirst on this thread is fucked up	johnnie	Mar 2012	#305
Sure.	Broderick	Mar 2012	#306
Who was Treyvon's judge for the crime of walking to the store? Zimmerman!	workinclasszero	Mar 2012	#309
Another one who doesn't respond to the original question ...thanks for adding to the discussion...	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#330
4772 views, 310 replies, only 3 sad recs	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#311
Ah so DU is nothing but a rec contest to you ...instead of it being a discussion board.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#322
is this an example of what you consider to be good 'discussion'?	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#326
You should ask the member that is into rec counts.	L0oniX	Mar 2012	#328
I asked you-	Bluerthanblue	Mar 2012	#331
This message was self-deleted by its author	HangOnKids	Mar 2012	#334
Obvious Troll is afraid of bad words?	RetroLounge	Mar 2012	#339
Oh, I'll wait for a trial.	varelse	Mar 2012	#312
Your thread has convinced me I should say...	MrMickeysMom	Mar 2012	#324
This thread is an example...	Oilwellian	Mar 2012	#337
Of course he deserves a trial.	AngryOldDem	Mar 2012	#342

Edit History

Please login to view edit histories.