Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: If Hitler hadn't attacked the USSR, would the USSR have maintained its secret pact with the Nazis? [View all]Octafish
(55,745 posts)24. Michael Parenti said USSR was forced into the non-aggression pact with Germany...
Alone among the nations that would later be allies, the USSR had asked the Western powers for help in opposing the rapidly re-arming Germany in the 1930s. It appears now that the pact was Soviet Russia's way of ensuring peace with Hitler.
THE COLD WAR IS AN OLD WAR
by Michael Parenti
from Contrary Notions (2007)
EXCERPT...
Repeated overtures by Moscow to conclude collective-security pacts with the Western democracies in order to contain Axis aggression were rebuffed, including Soviet attempts to render armed assistance to Czechoslovakia. Frustrated in its attempts to form an anti-Nazi alliance, and believing (correctly) that it was being set up as a target for Nazi aggression, the USSR signed an eleventh-hour nonaggression treaty with Hitler in 1939 to divert any immediate attack by German forces.
To this day, the Hitler-Stalin pact is paraded as proof of the USSR's diabolic affinity for Nazism and its willingness to cooperate with Hitler in the dismemberment of Poland. Conservative news columnist George Will was only one of many when he mistakenly described the Soviet Union as a regime that was "once allied with Hitler."44 The Soviets were never allied with Hitler. The pact was a treaty, not an alliance. It no more denoted an alliance with Nazism than would a nonaggression treaty between the United States and the Soviets have denoted an alliance between the two. On this point, British historian A. J. P. Taylor is worth quoting:
It was no doubt disgraceful that Soviet Russia should make any agreement with the leading Fascist state; but this reproach came ill from the statesmen who went to Munich .... (The Hitler-Stalin) pact contained none of the fulsome expressions of friendship which Chamberlain had put into the Anglo-German declaration on the day after the Munich conference. Indeed Stalin rejected any such expressions: "the Soviet Government could not suddenly present to the public German-Soviet assurances of friendship after (we) had been covered with buckets of filth by the Nazi Government for six years.
The pact was neither an alliance nor an agreement for the partition of Poland. Munich had been a true alliance for partition: the British and French dictated partition to the Czechs. The Soviet government undertook no such action against the Poles. They merely promised to remain neutral, which is what the Poles had always asked them to do and which Western policy implied also. More than this, the agreement was in the last resort anti-German: it limited the German advance eastwards in case of war. . . . (With the pact, the Soviets hoped to ward) off what they had most dreadeda united capitalist attack on Soviet Russia. ... It is difficult to see what other course Soviet Russia could have followed.45
CONTINUED...
http://www.skeptic.ca/Parenti_Cold_War.htm
Gee. What class of individual'd want to make money off of war?
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
If Hitler hadn't attacked the USSR, would the USSR have maintained its secret pact with the Nazis? [View all]
Boojatta
Mar 2012
OP
Try Messers. Reed And Fisher's 'The Deadly Embrace: Hitler, Stalin, And The Nazi-Soviet Pact'
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#7
Thank You, Sir: I Am Away From My Books At Present, and Cruising On Memory
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#32
England And France Did Regard Soviet Russia as An Enemy Power Prior To Barbarossa, Sir
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#39
Indeed, Sir, Not So Much Arguing as Providing Complementary Views And Supplementary Facts
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#53
This Sort Of Thing Cannot Be Settled, Sir, Obviously, But Here Are a Few Further Thoughts
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#64
Soviet Russia, Sir, Was In Nothing Remotely Resembling An Offensive Posture In The Summer Of '41
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#8
Von Moeltke The Elder, Sir, Was One Of the Few To Riddle the Matter Properly In the Modern Era
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#45
Probably, at least until the Soviets saw an advantage in stabbing Hitler in the back.
razorman
Mar 2012
#4
Stalin wasn't surprised that Hitler invaded, he was surprised that he did so in 1941
RZM
Mar 2012
#17
If there had been no Soviet Union, would the U.S. have saved & imported so many Nazi war criminals?
WinkyDink
Mar 2012
#11
Trust Is Not Quite The Right Word, Sir, Certainly Not In the Sense Of having Faith In His Word
The Magistrate
Mar 2012
#34
Michael Parenti said USSR was forced into the non-aggression pact with Germany...
Octafish
Mar 2012
#24
What if Britain and France had not declared war on Germany after the invasion of Poland?
FarCenter
Mar 2012
#31
The Tsar abdicated in March 1917, so the Eastern Front was pretty much over by then
FarCenter
Mar 2012
#61