Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

trumad

(41,692 posts)
29. Just call it years of experience
Fri Dec 27, 2013, 12:59 PM
Dec 2013

Of reading these types of Ops and matching the names of who posts them.

It's so obvious .... but hey...If not to you...oh well.

Not like people to lie like that about such things The Straight Story Dec 2013 #1
If you throw dirt at a man, some of it will stick. Festivito Dec 2013 #3
At a man? or at anyone? nt el_bryanto Dec 2013 #10
shrug... sibelian Dec 2013 #196
Yes it does davidpdx Dec 2013 #4
"once it hits the papers and news it really doesn't matter if the charges are dropped." Ghost in the Machine Dec 2013 #7
Perhaps the Folks In That Town Know Who Meri Jane Woods Was Married To ProfessorGAC Dec 2013 #11
Ah, true davidpdx Dec 2013 #180
woman scorned. not so much. husband generally kills cause scorned. wife generally kills cause of seabeyond Dec 2013 #104
Who was killed here? polly7 Dec 2013 #122
"Who was killed here?" really? this is what you start with replying to what i wrote. whatevah seabeyond Dec 2013 #127
Glad you're feeling better, Seabeyond... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #130
i am not addressing the OP. i am not addressing a conversation with you. i am addressing the stupid seabeyond Dec 2013 #132
Well, your original post in this thread was a piece... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #135
again. talking about the stupid ass saying a woman scorn. giving out facts that a woman does not seabeyond Dec 2013 #139
Strange how it's okay for some to define men by a minority who commit crimes... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #142
whatever. again. not what i am addressing seabeyond Dec 2013 #144
Okay...I'm just not following you on this apparently. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #146
Plenty of women scorned retaliate in all sorts of damaging, if not lethal, ways. polly7 Dec 2013 #143
brilliant polly. how often do you hear man scorned? seabeyond Dec 2013 #145
Brilliant seabeyond. polly7 Dec 2013 #147
ya. that would be a never. hence my post. seabeyond Dec 2013 #150
Sorry, you'd be wrong there. nt. polly7 Dec 2013 #152
lmfao woman seabeyond Dec 2013 #154
How on earth would you know what I hear? polly7 Dec 2013 #156
lordy woman. really? the point. where they CALLED ... men scorned, when they went after vengefully seabeyond Dec 2013 #167
At least we now know pintobean Dec 2013 #169
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #172
Ahhh ....... well I don't stroke out over outdated little terms. polly7 Dec 2013 #171
stroke out? done reading. this crap, i stop seabeyond Dec 2013 #173
k ..... bye. polly7 Dec 2013 #181
Looks like she may not be around for a while. pintobean Dec 2013 #188
I didn't alert on your hidden post, sea pintobean Dec 2013 #187
Years ago I worked at the same company as a married couple whose marriage ended pacalo Dec 2013 #182
That's very sad. polly7 Dec 2013 #183
She was a piece of work. pacalo Dec 2013 #185
lmao ... polly7 Dec 2013 #133
Funny how the two people most apparently offended by this thread... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #136
kicked it while discussing anything 'but' the actual OP ... polly7 Dec 2013 #140
are you suggesting i am offended by this thread? seabeyond Dec 2013 #141
I think so. pintobean Dec 2013 #151
i have not posted but to talk about woman scorn. if this is how you draw conclusions, it is no seabeyond Dec 2013 #153
I'm pretty good at left field. pintobean Dec 2013 #155
no, you are not. this is interpreted by you to mean i give a shit. another brilliant. seabeyond Dec 2013 #162
Now I'm hungry pintobean Dec 2013 #164
ahhhh, now you are resorting to the really lame diss. you have really excelled over the last couple seabeyond Dec 2013 #166
It wasn't a lame diss. pintobean Dec 2013 #168
you linked to a post that was in a fluid conversation. not my problem. the people i was addressing seabeyond Dec 2013 #170
It's nice to see pintobean Dec 2013 #174
yup. unfortunately, others fail. personally, i think it is purposeful and they are quite capable seabeyond Dec 2013 #176
I thought I missed a murder. polly7 Dec 2013 #134
Your information doesn't make me sympathize with this woman's actions. pacalo Dec 2013 #179
About this... pipi_k Dec 2013 #25
Yeah, guilty of dumping her lying ass Lifelong Dem Dec 2013 #71
I helped an innocent man who was accused of sexual assault. I knew for a fact that Zorra Dec 2013 #186
Thank you for posting this, Zorra. sibelian Dec 2013 #197
That is a terrible, terrible story. Sometimes I think "People = Shit" (to quote a song title) nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #198
Thank you, Zorra. Ghost Dog Dec 2013 #202
my son's mercuryblues Dec 2013 #212
That's pretty messed up. n/t tammywammy Dec 2013 #2
"lying to police" pipoman Dec 2013 #5
police can't speak w/o lying lame54 Dec 2013 #14
Indeed ...the police and detectives lie all the time. L0oniX Dec 2013 #16
Wouldn't that be considered.... daleanime Dec 2013 #56
Surprisingly, no. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #86
Making a false police report implicating another person is already illegal. Jenoch Dec 2013 #93
The article stated 40 counts pipoman Dec 2013 #204
I'm guessing the 40 counts is Jenoch Dec 2013 #207
Wow...that's just plain evil. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #6
What a horrible thing to do. HappyMe Dec 2013 #8
I saw a similar case 11 years ago madville Dec 2013 #9
I saw a couple of train wrecks like that when I was in the Air Force. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #20
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #12
hmmm... I must be missing something penultimate Dec 2013 #13
Check his "transparency" page ...it will help you understand. L0oniX Dec 2013 #19
Thanks for pointing that out. Explains a lot. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #34
Whose transparency page? arcane1 Dec 2013 #53
This one pintobean Dec 2013 #54
Is Trumad going to have to go sit in the corner for awhile come the New Year? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #76
For two weeks pintobean Dec 2013 #78
He's still got a few days left to raise his score. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #82
Aaaaand the jury is in... WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2013 #103
"Make it stop." NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #105
That is absolutely amazing. pintobean Dec 2013 #108
That was my rationale. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2013 #115
I've seen a transparency page shared several times. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #118
Yah that was surprising... Agschmid Dec 2013 #213
OFFS ...another example of people who should not be on a jury ...of any sort. L0oniX Dec 2013 #109
Interesting. I just noticed you referenced... WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2013 #112
...or an agenda against Pinto. L0oniX Dec 2013 #113
Definitely. WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2013 #116
I doubt that it was blue pintobean Dec 2013 #114
Thanks for pointing that out. LiberalFighter Dec 2013 #55
David has a habit of finding and posting the few news stories NuclearDem Dec 2013 #72
"Those stories are worth talking about..." NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #88
I never said there was anything wrong with discussing them. NuclearDem Dec 2013 #92
Oh, okay. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #94
Who's agenda is it, though? pintobean Dec 2013 #98
You still go in there? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #125
I don't post there pintobean Dec 2013 #128
I've never posted in there either. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #131
We had a forum called Meta pintobean Dec 2013 #148
False rape allegations? davidn3600 Dec 2013 #107
It's a conspiracy pintobean Dec 2013 #15
nah...it's a tag team of teh poor boys.. trumad Dec 2013 #18
What's "obvious" is your epic fail reframe. L0oniX Dec 2013 #23
uh huh.... trumad Dec 2013 #27
You're reading an awful lot into one news story. HappyMe Dec 2013 #24
Just call it years of experience trumad Dec 2013 #29
I don't keep track of who posts what sort of things. HappyMe Dec 2013 #36
No kidding. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #41
What makes you think I hate them trumad Dec 2013 #59
It's obvious pintobean Dec 2013 #60
Nah---not about me.... trumad Dec 2013 #62
Trying to get attention before January. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #64
Blog stalking? L0oniX Dec 2013 #42
Silly you trumad Dec 2013 #57
Right pintobean Dec 2013 #28
ah Pinto trumad Dec 2013 #31
I'm flattered pintobean Dec 2013 #33
Did you dress provocatively? L0oniX Dec 2013 #38
You'll have to ask trumad pintobean Dec 2013 #39
What is the problem exactly? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #17
Yeah sure... trumad Dec 2013 #21
You've really been on a conspiracy trip lately. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #22
nah.... trumad Dec 2013 #26
Okay, whatever. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #30
I already said whatever.... trumad Dec 2013 #32
And like clockwork, you jumped in to troll over it.... ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #35
Agree. If he keeps this up he won't be here much longer. L0oniX Dec 2013 #37
I think that's the point. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #40
What happens in January? Is Skinner finally going to purge GD? leeroysphitz Dec 2013 #44
I think that's when anyone with more than five locks... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #45
On the 6th, and thereafter, anyone with an exposed transparency page pintobean Dec 2013 #47
Oh, that. I was hoping for a good old fashioned purge like we used to leeroysphitz Dec 2013 #51
I wonder if he has anything planned for his big finale. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #52
It is not GD that is the problem. RC Dec 2013 #87
I know. I was hoping those parties might be sent back where they came from... leeroysphitz Dec 2013 #90
Really--- been here a lot fucking longer than you... trumad Dec 2013 #61
It's good to have hopes and dreams. L0oniX Dec 2013 #85
Cool story dude. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #123
This message was self-deleted by its author trumad Dec 2013 #58
OMFG!!!! pintobean Dec 2013 #63
maybe not the best phrasing Union Scribe Dec 2013 #65
Dude, that's just creepy. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #66
What? trumad said something creepy? ProudToBeBlueInRhody Dec 2013 #73
Strange, I know. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #74
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #77
Woah. aikoaiko Dec 2013 #106
Nice capture. L0oniX Dec 2013 #111
I know what he meant, but out of context, that is just... Geesh... nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #199
Finally he spoke the truth! nt Bonobo Dec 2013 #175
I just noticed pintobean Dec 2013 #178
You might want to re-phrase that trumad. It sounds like something you know who would say. madinmaryland Dec 2013 #67
Unintentional DUzy?? madinmaryland Dec 2013 #68
Wow you are really full of it... SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #91
Man, that's brutal. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #95
Thanks... I think it has something to do with my not enjoying these "war of the sexes" threads.. SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #97
It's only a small, vocal minority... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #99
uh huh trumad Dec 2013 #96
Ahhh at least you don't defy expectations! SomethingFishy Dec 2013 #100
Believe me, when it happens to you, I will not shed a tear for you. nt madinmaryland Dec 2013 #119
uh huh trumad Dec 2013 #120
That was a really cute post you had above. I'm sure cboy and upton are getting madinmaryland Dec 2013 #121
Don't you have somebody to go poke? Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #158
Don't encourage that. pintobean Dec 2013 #161
Just whiny little guys. trumad Dec 2013 #163
Reminds me of righty friend always posting treestar Dec 2013 #137
Good example trumad Dec 2013 #165
So we should completely ignore any case where a woman does something bad to a man davidn3600 Dec 2013 #184
I'm just saying statistically the women are more often attacked by the men treestar Dec 2013 #206
"just trying to make it appear like that statistic is not true..." NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #209
Over time we know which posters think what treestar Dec 2013 #210
Okey dokey. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #211
This post should be deleted as disruptive, IMO. Hosnon Dec 2013 #177
*facepalm* Dash87 Dec 2013 #43
I'll never understand why people do this. geomon666 Dec 2013 #46
I suspect that this and similar happens all the time. nt Demo_Chris Dec 2013 #48
All the time? I dunno about that, 'cause we'd hear about it more often penultimate Dec 2013 #89
Same thing happened to a friend in Ca FreakinDJ Dec 2013 #49
Good grief...why wouldn't she be charged? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #50
Post removed Post removed Dec 2013 #69
Seriously? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #70
Holy smokes! HappyMe Dec 2013 #79
My thought as well. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #80
Wow! That's one butt load of prejudiced assumptions backed into a single sentence. Impressive. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #81
Aren't you adorable. (n/t) WorseBeforeBetter Dec 2013 #117
Was that a crazy hit and run post or what? NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #124
Yeah, because there's no such thing as an "innocent man," right? They're *all* rapists/batterers/ nomorenomore08 Dec 2013 #200
How evil. dawg Dec 2013 #75
True. / nt NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #84
What a dumbass HipChick Dec 2013 #83
Really! Not the brightest bulb on the Christmas tree. KansDem Dec 2013 #126
If this is proven in court then shame on her. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #101
Just a hunch... NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #102
Good point. hrmjustin Dec 2013 #110
Isn't this more than just lying to police or filing a false police report? KansDem Dec 2013 #129
Yes. She was actually charged for the child porn. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #138
Thanks! KansDem Dec 2013 #149
Ha ha. Comrade Grumpy Dec 2013 #159
I don't think this couple is compatible. Just my sense of things lostincalifornia Dec 2013 #157
Pretty sick woman maddezmom Dec 2013 #160
I find is fascinating that there are no admonitions about innocent until proven guilty BainsBane Dec 2013 #189
She IS innocent until proven guilty davidn3600 Dec 2013 #191
evidence like DNA and a medical exam showing vaginal tearing, bruising, and wounds BainsBane Dec 2013 #192
That would be strong evidence suggesting rape davidn3600 Dec 2013 #193
She obviously never heard of computer forensics. n/t cynatnite Dec 2013 #190
If she had back dated the computer gerogie2 Dec 2013 #194
How the HELL isn't she being prosecuted for acquiring child porn? Or is she? U4ikLefty Dec 2013 #195
Yes, she is. NaturalHigh Dec 2013 #203
Oh good. I cannot read too much of these "threads" of late. U4ikLefty Dec 2013 #208
she is not fit to supervise a child Skittles Dec 2013 #201
Dayum! Waiting For Everyman Dec 2013 #205
please sign camille1971 Jan 2014 #214
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Woman arrested for attemp...»Reply #29