Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
82. Better Believe it used tropes
Mon Nov 18, 2013, 08:52 PM
Nov 2013

to get the point across. When DUers state a position with wisdom to back them up? It seems rather like sour grapes to compare them to a person that did nothing but sour grapes the community.

When you realize that good is being done, the best thing you can do is stop criticizing it.

It'll be fixed in his next term progressoid Nov 2013 #1
Because he can't do everything at once and cherokeeprogressive Nov 2013 #2
If only we'd had a larger Democratic majority, this all would have been fixed in '09. Chakab Nov 2013 #28
Obstructionism and pony! Enthusiast Nov 2013 #60
and he's not a dictator and you're a racist Doctor_J Nov 2013 #89
Aww, you mad? cherokeeprogressive Nov 2013 #95
Sorry, forgot the Doctor_J Nov 2013 #119
I didn't think that sounded like you. cherokeeprogressive Nov 2013 #137
Yes, I am a well-know pony-wanting Ted Cruz Leftist Doctor_J Nov 2013 #138
My pony needs to shit rainbows Aerows Nov 2013 #98
LOL n/t cherokeeprogressive Nov 2013 #99
It's only been 58 months!!1! QC Nov 2013 #125
Lieberman! Doctor_J Nov 2013 #139
Need bankie with pony.... L0oniX Nov 2013 #211
OT: When I was a kid Aerows Nov 2013 #219
Lol billhicks76 Nov 2013 #41
HA! SammyWinstonJack Nov 2013 #132
But the stock market hit a record high today Fumesucker Nov 2013 #3
And dying like a flock of pigeons Aerows Nov 2013 #84
The smart money will know when to get out. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #117
Yes, the smart money will know when to pull out but fasttense Nov 2013 #121
Depressingly true. Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #127
My point exactly. nt Ace Acme Nov 2013 #155
I was wondering why all the homeless people were dancing and partying. L0oniX Nov 2013 #214
Obama said a lot of things during the campaign that turned out to be illusions quinnox Nov 2013 #4
Maybe he wants Clinton to keep that as his legacy. ProSense Nov 2013 #6
A politician keeping their legacy Aerows Nov 2013 #29
"A politician keeping their legacy means fuck all to the people they harm in the process." ProSense Nov 2013 #32
Only if he's solitary in supporting that legacy. Aerows Nov 2013 #35
No, it's Clinton's legacy. ProSense Nov 2013 #37
Oh, I see Aerows Nov 2013 #162
What part of he made a promise and broke it is so difficult to understand? cali Nov 2013 #45
Is his Presidency over? ProSense Nov 2013 #54
TPP is just as real as NAFTA and just as detrimental to the economy Aerows Nov 2013 #64
NAFTA has been in effect for 20 years. TPP is being negotiated. n/t ProSense Nov 2013 #66
And NAFTA over the last 20 years Aerows Nov 2013 #69
So they're not the same: One has been law for 20 years, the other is still being negotiated. n/t ProSense Nov 2013 #72
One has been a bad law for 20 years Aerows Nov 2013 #73
Negotiated in secret because it can't stand sunshine. Jackpine Radical Nov 2013 #128
I'm sorry, but your refusal to deal with reality and overwhelming cali Nov 2013 #85
I'm not sorry that you're "quite sad" ProSense Nov 2013 #86
Please elaborate. cui bono Nov 2013 #113
where are the blue ink links when we need them? Tuesday Afternoon Nov 2013 #236
Yeah, because he's against a small free trade agreement while pushing for a HUGE one. cui bono Nov 2013 #112
Millions of people would like to protect THEIR legacies. Is there something more sabrina 1 Nov 2013 #223
The DU hard core "fan" club started bashing him on Jan 21 2009. George II Nov 2013 #156
True, it can't be denied G_j Nov 2013 #5
But Obama says the TPP will be a good thing solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #7
Yeah, it'll create more jobs... ReRe Nov 2013 #23
Green for victory!!... SidDithers Nov 2013 #27
Well, since you don't live or vote in our country ... Aerows Nov 2013 #33
Oh, it's you again... SidDithers Nov 2013 #34
Yep Aerows Nov 2013 #36
Yeah. Why would a Canadian have an opinion in a thread about NAFTA?... SidDithers Nov 2013 #40
Since it didn't have a negative impact on your own country Aerows Nov 2013 #67
why don't you, as a Canadian, spend anytime on Canadian politics? cali Nov 2013 #46
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #48
Enjoy Aerows Nov 2013 #96
big mouthed Furiner you. Whisp Nov 2013 #173
Whisp, I love you Aerows Nov 2013 #193
I'm always snide and angry too. Whisp Nov 2013 #194
Look into NAFTA Aerows Nov 2013 #195
everyone loses, that's for sure. Except the privileged. Whisp Nov 2013 #196
Unless we put a stop to it, we will Aerows Nov 2013 #197
Interloper Aerows Nov 2013 #52
+1000! Puglover Nov 2013 #160
We don't need yer stinking duct tape! L0oniX Nov 2013 #218
Ugh. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2013 #134
I'd would like to know why Obama thinks that treestar Nov 2013 #143
"Broad outline"...."plenty of details to work out" George II Nov 2013 #157
IF labor rights and environmental standards are part of the TPP, it's an effective renegotiation pampango Nov 2013 #8
You don't really think there will be labor rights and environmental standards in TPP, do you? WowSeriously Nov 2013 #24
Yes - who among the many corporate lawyers who negotiated the TPP in secret amongst themselves Maedhros Nov 2013 #49
I can't think of any. WowSeriously Nov 2013 #87
In another thread, the TPP was called "effective goverment" Maedhros Nov 2013 #109
Neither can I. cui bono Nov 2013 #114
Thank you! WowSeriously Nov 2013 #131
That was Obama's original plan and conservatives have criticized their ongoing discussion. pampango Nov 2013 #70
Well, you're far more optimistic than I. WowSeriously Nov 2013 #88
At least you admit that TPP is largely unsupportable n/t brentspeak Nov 2013 #97
If there are no enforceable provisions on labor rights and the environment, it will indeed be pampango Nov 2013 #124
Yes, I'm sure labor rights and evironmental standards have been vigorously defended by the list of Marr Nov 2013 #115
They were not 'excluded'. They are, IMHO, underrepresented. Their issues are under discussion. pampango Nov 2013 #123
Bwhahahahaha!! And if I am a good girl, Santa will buy me a new house!. n/t truedelphi Nov 2013 #177
Clinton was married to the man who brought NAFTA into our lives. truedelphi Nov 2013 #9
Hillary is all for TPP solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #15
In the words of the late, great Ted Kennedy ... Laelth Nov 2013 #17
Democratic leaders have a lot to answer for. truedelphi Nov 2013 #53
You'll get no argument from me on any of that. Laelth Nov 2013 #56
Saw a new bumper sticker today that read: HE LIES. polichick Nov 2013 #10
Soon, there will be ones that say: Muslim Socialist Lies. n/t ProSense Nov 2013 #42
Or worse. polichick Nov 2013 #62
a stunning must see video from 2007 solarhydrocan Nov 2013 #11
That's was the moment I was looking for back in 2007. He sold me. pa28 Nov 2013 #76
i still wonder when he started to shift tobeing the truedelphi Nov 2013 #94
All along, or you would never even heard his name. nt Demo_Chris Nov 2013 #104
Exactly. nt NorthCarolina Nov 2013 #122
All along or he wouldn't have gotten anywhere near the Presidency. SammyWinstonJack Nov 2013 #135
Ain't it the truth. n/t truedelphi Nov 2013 #176
Like the two posters up top I'll say "all along" as well. pa28 Nov 2013 #224
k&r for the truth, however depressing it may be. n/t Laelth Nov 2013 #12
+1000 n/t whathehell Nov 2013 #31
You Better Believe It, DKF! n/t scheming daemons Nov 2013 #13
Nailed it...nt SidDithers Nov 2013 #59
Yeap, Obama's second term is over so ... uponit7771 Nov 2013 #14
K&R liberal_at_heart Nov 2013 #16
Good news: ProSense Nov 2013 #18
This is a thread about Obama's comments about NAFTA. As your link indicates there is already totodeinhere Nov 2013 #43
Recent comments? n/t ProSense Nov 2013 #47
This was known in 2008--you just heard about this? nt geek tragedy Nov 2013 #19
The OP is just reminding those who have forgotten. WowSeriously Nov 2013 #26
Welcome to DU! n/t Aerows Nov 2013 #163
Glad to be here! WowSeriously Nov 2013 #166
I am no Hillary fan, but I do remember her campaign circulating the anti-Obama point that he had GoneFishin Nov 2013 #20
Yep. Austan Goolsbee (Obama's chief economic adviser during the primary) met DURHAM D Nov 2013 #22
+1 n/t lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #103
"I am no Hillary fan, but" she supports NAFTA. ProSense Nov 2013 #44
Anyone have a link of U.S. population trends (other than what's on census.gov) Politicub Nov 2013 #21
It's cute the way you use a $ when you accuse Obama of being a liar...nt SidDithers Nov 2013 #25
anything substantive to add, or is this simply off topic literary criticism...? mike_c Nov 2013 #30
There's nothing substantive about this use of TPP treestar Nov 2013 #226
It's cute when people that live in and vote in the United States of America Aerows Nov 2013 #50
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #51
I look forward to the day Aerows Nov 2013 #55
I can't vote in your elections! Aerows Nov 2013 #57
Crack smoking mayor.... HooptieWagon Nov 2013 #77
Yeah. The $ kind of detracted from the factual matter of the lie. pa28 Nov 2013 #80
Your just a hater. Be a good Dem and love everything he says! Phlem Nov 2013 #38
Listen to the Canadians that can't even vote in this country Aerows Nov 2013 #61
I hear you brother. Phlem Nov 2013 #63
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #68
I know, you crack me up :) Aerows Nov 2013 #71
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #90
... SidDithers Nov 2013 #91
Why do you even post here? Marr Nov 2013 #116
Post removed Post removed Nov 2013 #161
Um, aren't they involved here? treestar Nov 2013 #229
. Bobbie Jo Nov 2013 #92
whatever.... Phlem Nov 2013 #93
so.... Bobbie Jo Nov 2013 #100
When you make a smart remark, I'm sure someone will. Aerows Nov 2013 #168
lol Bobbie Jo Nov 2013 #174
Glad I amused somebody else Aerows Nov 2013 #178
NT ctsnowman Nov 2013 #147
? Bobbie Jo Nov 2013 #150
+100000000 woo me with science Nov 2013 #39
Real harm to real Americans. Enthusiast Nov 2013 #58
That piece doesn't really prove the job loss is caused solely by NAFTA treestar Nov 2013 #65
The estimates are that NAFTA cost about 700,000 jobs since Clinton signed it ProSense Nov 2013 #74
Which is alarming Aerows Nov 2013 #75
NAFTA is a drop of water in the bucket compared to all offshoring of US jobs since 1978. go west young man Nov 2013 #110
Do the other countries protest it the same way. treestar Nov 2013 #144
Here ya go: From the Guardian UK and others. go west young man Nov 2013 #221
That too just states it, but doesn't say how they come to the conclusion treestar Nov 2013 #141
You're kidding, right? The Mexican 1% is doing just fine, as is our 1% eridani Nov 2013 #108
No, I'm wanting an explanation and not just a conclusion treestar Nov 2013 #142
Trade agreements specifically designed to benefit corporate power at the expense of eridani Nov 2013 #207
Any support for that notion? treestar Nov 2013 #220
Yes--to favor corporations and hurt real people eridani Nov 2013 #222
Same old friggin' conclusions treestar Nov 2013 #227
Fine--keep working for the 1% eridani Nov 2013 #230
It's clear from reading some of these responses...... marmar Nov 2013 #78
Indeed, it has Aerows Nov 2013 #83
Watch the body language and facial affect of BOTH in the following video. bvar22 Nov 2013 #79
Did Bill O'Reilly's body language expert provide this? JoePhilly Nov 2013 #126
BBI was better at this... nt dionysus Nov 2013 #81
Better Believe it used tropes Aerows Nov 2013 #82
BBI used trolling. And this thread is useful as flypaper...it tells us who on DU msanthrope Nov 2013 #130
I assume you think Aerows Nov 2013 #165
Thank you for conceeding my point...and proving that this thread is flamebait. msanthrope Nov 2013 #175
Oh my Aerows Nov 2013 #179
When you have some 'law' let me know what you need interpreted. nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #180
When you actually have a patent Aerows Nov 2013 #181
Jealousy never wears well on anyone. If you are ever so fortunate as to inherit msanthrope Nov 2013 #182
LOL Aerows Nov 2013 #183
Aerows..making fun of a dyslexic who forgot to use the spellcheck should be beneath you. msanthrope Nov 2013 #184
Oh, you are dyslexic? Aerows Nov 2013 #185
You were in a thread where I discussed my dyslexia...cited above. Also, a simple msanthrope Nov 2013 #187
That has zero bearing Aerows Nov 2013 #188
You owe me an apology. nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #189
For asking you a question Aerows Nov 2013 #190
*crickets* Aerows Nov 2013 #198
Some of us have lives, and children to care for, and dinner to cook. You still owe me an apology.nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #199
Some of us do, too Aerows Nov 2013 #200
You still owe me an apology. And I already answered your question in post #175. Less heat, more msanthrope Nov 2013 #201
That was an answer? Aerows Nov 2013 #202
I did not write what is contained in that second quotation mark. So you owe me another apology, msanthrope Nov 2013 #203
Anything but addressing the question with regard to the policy Aerows Nov 2013 #204
Again, you have claimed that I wrote something I did not. I answered your question in post 175. msanthrope Nov 2013 #205
I couldn't debate what you wrote in post #175 Aerows Nov 2013 #206
Exactly. I told you I hadn't any opinion on the TPP. You refused to accept that. msanthrope Nov 2013 #208
Uh huh Aerows Nov 2013 #209
You most definitely made up quotes that I did not write. I've pointed them out. I think when msanthrope Nov 2013 #210
Angry? Aerows Nov 2013 #212
Quite angry, because you've persisted after getting an answer you did not like, made fun of me, and msanthrope Nov 2013 #213
Angry? Aerows Nov 2013 #215
Having a ball? But you just claimed you were indifferent. nt msanthrope Nov 2013 #216
Oh no, about three posts up Aerows Nov 2013 #217
You've been locked out of this thread, so I shall only hope for msanthrope Nov 2013 #235
BBI simply posted articles from right wing sources treestar Nov 2013 #225
He wants to negotiate......he'd like to make it worse. yourout Nov 2013 #101
Here's the thing. I don't get how Obama supporters have standing to criticize Clinton. lumberjack_jeff Nov 2013 #102
Really? hfojvt Nov 2013 #106
No he wasn't. He's working on the TTP agreement in secret. lonestarnot Nov 2013 #105
2018: "why do you leftbaggers hate ShulerTrades?! it has Affordable in the title!!!" MisterP Nov 2013 #107
Bill Clinton, Obama, Hillary dreamnightwind Nov 2013 #111
This. n/t jtuck004 Nov 2013 #118
I see the usual du globalists are all over this post. B Calm Nov 2013 #120
As are the usual du nationalists. pampango Nov 2013 #129
that's an erroneous claim. We aren't nationalists. cali Nov 2013 #133
Fair enough. Fair trade that encompasses respect for human and labor rights and the environment pampango Nov 2013 #136
I think the word you're looking for is populist Doctor_J Nov 2013 #140
No. There is global populism and nationalist populism. pampango Nov 2013 #145
And if what is "good for the people of the world" (sic) happens to line a few already-rich pockets, Romulox Nov 2013 #172
You're confused again. "Nationalist" isn't the opposite of "Corporatist". Romulox Nov 2013 #149
I agree. "Nationalist" and "corporatist" are far from opposites-both are favorites of conservatives. pampango Nov 2013 #152
Nonsense. Globalist is another synonym for Corporatist. You are manipulating words, again. Romulox Nov 2013 #169
Equating globalism with corporatism is your opinion. You are making your own synonyms now. pampango Nov 2013 #191
Reality has to be a factor, pampango. In the *United States*, "globalism" been devastating Romulox Nov 2013 #237
PS: Have you *ever* had a positive response to your globalist talking points? I've yet to see it. Romulox Nov 2013 #170
Globalism doesn't appear to be entirely wrong treestar Nov 2013 #233
Incoherent, as always. nt Romulox Nov 2013 #238
That does not make any point treestar Nov 2013 #242
The post to which I responded is utter word salad. That is my point. It's not worth "debating". nt Romulox Nov 2013 #243
No, it's not treestar Nov 2013 #244
I don't even think it's that sophisticated treestar Nov 2013 #231
Oh boy, people disagree with you! treestar Nov 2013 #228
Just one, and probably has an overseas job. . B Calm Nov 2013 #232
Ignorance isn't an argument. So, "People lost jobs due to NAFTA? I hadn't heard!" Romulox Nov 2013 #239
If you want to argue people lost jobs due to NAFTA treestar Nov 2013 #240
Nope. Again, your ignorance isn't a counterargument. nt Romulox Nov 2013 #241
I don't think he was bullshitting at all. NCTraveler Nov 2013 #146
K & R ctsnowman Nov 2013 #148
Are you guys just poring over old new clips and stories to find stuff to bash Obama about? George II Nov 2013 #151
I once saw him use a Canadian "quarter" in an AMERICAN soda machine Orrex Nov 2013 #153
I once saw a proven liar Aerows Nov 2013 #167
The nation was had. woo me with science Nov 2013 #154
Sen. Clinton was BSing about it too... awoke_in_2003 Nov 2013 #158
Well, this would seem to answer the question as to what happened to Obama to make him right wing? lark Nov 2013 #159
I remember that. BlueCheese Nov 2013 #164
You couldn't tell that at the time? BainsBane Nov 2013 #171
Bullshitter + politician = redundancy. Tierra_y_Libertad Nov 2013 #186
Look at the bullshitters that have Aerows Nov 2013 #192
+1 B Calm Nov 2013 #234
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»From the very beginning, ...»Reply #82