HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Just based on my FB feed ... » Reply #9
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU

Reply #9


Response to BlueToTheBone (Reply #7)

Fri Oct 18, 2013, 08:58 AM

9. It was a bipartisan decision, so hopefully we will see more of this.

Although the funds will go toward a dam and locks river project in McConnell’s home state, Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) said that he and Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) were responsible for its inclusion in the final version of the bill.

“According to the Army Corps of Engineers, 160 million taxpayer dollars will be wasted because of canceled contracts if this language is not included. Sen. Feinstein and I, as chairman and ranking member of the Energy and Water Appropriations Subcommittee, requested this provision. It has already been approved this year by the House and Senate,” Alexander said. And a Democratic Senate aide told CNN that McConnell didn’t advocate for it to be in the bill.

http://www.newsweek.com/three-choice-cuts-budget-pork-clean-budget-455

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Please login to view edit histories.