HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Obamacare NOT what is con... » Reply #2

Reply #2


Response to dkf (Reply #1)

Thu Sep 26, 2013, 02:56 PM

2. there are earlier reports from 2007 with similar analysis showing drops in coverage

 

not just because of employment numbers but also because of companies for a variety of reasons dropping health coverage or reducing it. None of that had anything to do with ACA/Obamacare.

Why do you take a long standing trend that has been proven by data and still try to shoe horn in Obamacare as the cause?

From 2007:

The decline in health insurance coverage continued unabated in 2006, driven primarily by the continued erosion in employer-provided health insurance. In 2006, 47 million Americans were uninsured, up nearly 8.6 million since 2000. The rate of those without insurance has grown 2.1 percentage points during this period, from 13.7% in 2000 to 15.8% in 2006.

Employment-based coverage is still the most prominent form of health insurance in the United States at 59.7% of all Americans; however, the rate of this coverage has fallen in every year since 2000. In 2000, 64.2% of Americans had employer-provided health insurance. By 2006, this percent had fallen 4.5 percentage points. Nearly 2.3 million fewer Americans had employment-based insurance in 2006 than in 2000. This decline does not take into account population growth. As many as 13 million more people would have had employer-provided health insurance in 2006 if the coverage rate had remained at the 2000 level.

Because of these large declines in employer-provided health insurance, workers and their families have been falling into the ranks of the uninsured at alarming rates. There were almost 5 million more uninsured workers in 2006 than in 2000. While uninsured workers are disproportionately young, non-white, less educated, and low wage, workers across the socio-economic spectrum have experienced losses in coverage. Even the most highly educated and highest wage workers had lower rates of insurance coverage in 2006 than in 2000.



http://www.epi.org/publication/bp203/

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 17 replies Author Time Post
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 OP
dkf Sep 2013 #1
LineLineReply there are earlier reports from 2007 with similar analysis showing drops in coverage
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #2
dkf Sep 2013 #8
ProSense Sep 2013 #9
dkf Sep 2013 #13
ProSense Sep 2013 #14
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #17
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #10
Lint Head Sep 2013 #3
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #4
ProSense Sep 2013 #7
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #16
Ron Green Sep 2013 #5
Pretzel_Warrior Sep 2013 #6
madville Sep 2013 #11
Scuba Sep 2013 #12
Puzzledtraveller Sep 2013 #15
Please login to view edit histories.