Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

joshcryer

(62,265 posts)
22. I'd bet that we get a public option before the exchanges go up in 2014.
Fri Mar 2, 2012, 04:29 AM
Mar 2012

Note: it will only happen if we keep the pressure up, of course, so I don't mind the hyperbole and outrage over something that hasn't happened yet or will happen.

How about "so what? you have to buy car insurance too" saras Mar 2012 #1
Car insurance and health insurance are completely different Art_from_Ark Mar 2012 #6
Those are differences, but not major to me, let alone "complete" saras Mar 2012 #43
I can avoid driving a car to avoid paying insurance. This forced-purchase law is bullshit. Zalatix Mar 2012 #9
You pay into Medicare don't you? joshcryer Mar 2012 #15
The fines are merely to make sure that you pay into the private health insurance system. Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #17
Of course. The money will be redistributed to HHS though. joshcryer Mar 2012 #21
Bullshit. Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #24
What is bullshit? If I wanted an HSA it'd be $150 a month. joshcryer Mar 2012 #26
I live in San Francisco. I don't qualify for an exchange because my employer offers Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #27
Then that's surely your employer screwing you and not health care reform? joshcryer Mar 2012 #28
When I say I can't decline group I don't mean that I don't have that option... Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #29
That's fair enough, as I said. The exclusionary period needs to be ended. joshcryer Mar 2012 #30
If we start off with a system that the employer pays 6%-7.5% into the system PLUS Luminous Animal Mar 2012 #33
Hence why I prefer MEDICARE FOR ALL over RomneyCare 2.0 Zalatix Mar 2012 #18
Of course, so do I. joshcryer Mar 2012 #20
No they're not. They're giveaways to corporations. Zalatix Mar 2012 #45
I do to, but I also support what Obama did over the previous status quo. Warren DeMontague Mar 2012 #25
Yes. I like paying into GOVERNMENT programs for the common good eridani Mar 2012 #32
+1 area51 Mar 2012 #16
STATES force you to buy car insurance, and THEY have that right. We don't have a NATIONAL govt... cherokeeprogressive Mar 2012 #44
If you can whittle that down to bumper sticker size DearAbby Mar 2012 #2
Sad, but true. n/t FSogol Mar 2012 #3
If they already have health insurance through their job, nothing will change MiniMe Mar 2012 #4
It amazes me, overheard on fr waiting room right after passage of bill Thinkingabout Mar 2012 #5
So essentially you are saying that this old Republican idea is a good one. MadHound Mar 2012 #7
*crickets* Zalatix Mar 2012 #10
Exactly what I was thinking. Dragonfli Mar 2012 #11
+1 Poll_Blind Mar 2012 #12
So essentially you are saying near universial coverage sucks if it's not perfect. joshcryer Mar 2012 #14
Yes. Its not the best idea, but its a decent idea. phleshdef Mar 2012 #19
I'd bet that we get a public option before the exchanges go up in 2014. joshcryer Mar 2012 #22
I wouldn't take that bet unless the time window was much wider, say, 10 or 15 years. Selatius Mar 2012 #31
What the HELL are you talking about LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #34
Republicans of that day were far more liberal than today's Republicans treestar Mar 2012 #61
Even if you have insurance you can be denied care.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #8
Increased penalties can be added later Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #13
Would we be better off without the ACA? LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #57
Absolutely not Motown_Johnny Mar 2012 #59
It will hardly be enforced, the IRS doesn't think it's worth it: joshcryer Mar 2012 #23
A lot of people are self employed because there are few jobs.. Fumesucker Mar 2012 #35
Basically true. sendero Mar 2012 #36
Nobody is forced to buy health insurance under the ACA LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #38
Some would say.. sendero Mar 2012 #48
It's not semantics LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #49
No.. sendero Mar 2012 #60
I tell them if they don't buy it and get hit by a truck, taxpayers are stuck with the bill. Vinca Mar 2012 #37
Your description is somewhat misleading. Jim Lane Mar 2012 #39
Not in the real world LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #41
but they will dun you, ruin your credit, etc mike_c Mar 2012 #42
The ACA helps people LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #52
Please don't put words in my mouth. I'm absolutely not defending the present system. Jim Lane Mar 2012 #46
When you argue for repeal of the ACA, you argue for the status quo LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #51
And you just continue to put words in my mouth Jim Lane Mar 2012 #55
ive heard good arguments against mandates Enrique Mar 2012 #40
... Fumesucker Mar 2012 #47
Nobody thinks ACA is perfect, least of all Obama LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #50
"It's so you don't become one of those welfare queens you hate so much" krispos42 Mar 2012 #53
Of course it forces people to buy health insurance from the private market. girl gone mad Mar 2012 #54
Nope LuckyTheDog Mar 2012 #56
You are arguing that the mandate is a tax. It is not. former9thward Mar 2012 #58
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Talking points: What to t...»Reply #22