HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » When a Pregnancy is Unwan... » Reply #65
Introducing Discussionist: A new forum by the creators of DU
In the discussion thread: When a Pregnancy is Unwanted... [View all]

Response to Gov101 (Original post)

Wed Sep 18, 2013, 03:30 PM

65. Blackmun got it right.

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/historics/USSC_CR_0410_0113_ZO.html

This right of privacy, whether it be founded in the Fourteenth Amendment's concept of personal liberty and restrictions upon state action, as we feel it is, or, as the District Court determined, in the Ninth Amendment's reservation of rights to the people, is broad enough to encompass a woman's decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy. The detriment that the State would impose upon the pregnant woman by denying this choice altogether is apparent. Specific and direct harm medically diagnosable even in early pregnancy may be involved. Maternity, or additional offspring, may force upon the woman a distressful life and future. Psychological harm may be imminent. Mental and physical health may be taxed by child care. There is also the distress, for all concerned, associated with the unwanted child, and there is the problem of bringing a child into a family already unable, psychologically and otherwise, to care for it. In other cases, as in this one, the additional difficulties and continuing stigma of unwed motherhood may be involved. All these are factors the woman and her responsible physician necessarily will consider in consultation.

On the basis of elements such as these, appellant and some amici argue that the woman's right is absolute and that she is entitled to terminate her pregnancy at whatever time, in whatever way, and for whatever reason she alone chooses. With this we do not agree. Appellant's arguments that Texas either has no valid interest at all in regulating the abortion decision, or no interest strong enough to support any limitation upon the woman's sole determination, are unpersuasive. The Court's decisions recognizing a right of privacy also acknowledge that some state regulation in areas protected by that right is appropriate. As noted above, a State may properly assert important interests in safeguarding health, in maintaining medical standards, and in protecting potential life. At some point in pregnancy, these respective interests become sufficiently compelling to sustain regulation of the factors that govern the abortion decision. The privacy right involved, therefore, cannot be said to be absolute. In fact, it is not clear to us that the claim asserted by some amici that one has an unlimited right to do with one's body as one pleases bears a close relationship to the right of privacy previously articulated in the Court's decisions. The Court has refused to recognize an unlimited right of this kind in the past. Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U.S. 11 (1905) (vaccination); Buck v. Bell, 274 U.S. 200 (1927) ( sterilization).

We, therefore, conclude that the right of personal privacy includes the abortion decision, but that this right is not unqualified, and must be considered against important state interests in regulation.

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 86 replies Author Time Post
Gov101 Sep 2013 OP
Skittles Sep 2013 #1
bettyellen Sep 2013 #4
newfie11 Sep 2013 #11
Name removed Sep 2013 #25
Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #26
Name removed Sep 2013 #28
smokey nj Sep 2013 #33
Sheldon Cooper Sep 2013 #34
pnwmom Sep 2013 #36
Ohio Joe Sep 2013 #50
steve2470 Sep 2013 #72
shraby Sep 2013 #2
bettyellen Sep 2013 #3
Lugnut Sep 2013 #5
RebelOne Sep 2013 #55
Summer Hathaway Sep 2013 #6
Hekate Sep 2013 #7
djean111 Sep 2013 #9
Skittles Sep 2013 #12
Gov101 Sep 2013 #38
Hekate Sep 2013 #45
petronius Sep 2013 #8
SheilaT Sep 2013 #10
blueamy66 Sep 2013 #17
Mushroom Sep 2013 #13
smokey nj Sep 2013 #14
deutsey Sep 2013 #15
blueamy66 Sep 2013 #16
LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #18
Nevernose Sep 2013 #19
Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #20
LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #22
Proud Liberal Dem Sep 2013 #24
LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #41
me b zola Sep 2013 #48
LiberalLoner Sep 2013 #51
LineReply .
LWolf Sep 2013 #21
MineralMan Sep 2013 #23
JoePhilly Sep 2013 #27
ejpoeta Sep 2013 #29
stevenleser Sep 2013 #31
enlightenment Sep 2013 #39
stevenleser Sep 2013 #43
enlightenment Sep 2013 #46
stevenleser Sep 2013 #47
enlightenment Sep 2013 #58
LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #57
stevenleser Sep 2013 #60
Hekate Sep 2013 #64
stevenleser Sep 2013 #66
pnwmom Sep 2013 #42
stevenleser Sep 2013 #44
Hippo_Tron Sep 2013 #75
ejpoeta Sep 2013 #86
Major Nikon Sep 2013 #30
Autumn Sep 2013 #32
JaneyVee Sep 2013 #35
Lars39 Sep 2013 #37
Avalux Sep 2013 #40
lapislzi Sep 2013 #49
Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #52
Arugula Latte Sep 2013 #53
lapislzi Sep 2013 #54
LostOne4Ever Sep 2013 #56
Blue_In_AK Sep 2013 #59
MADem Sep 2013 #61
MADem Sep 2013 #62
PeaceNikki Sep 2013 #63
LineReply Blackmun got it right.
lumberjack_jeff Sep 2013 #65
Raffi Ella Sep 2013 #67
Gov101 Sep 2013 #68
Raffi Ella Sep 2013 #70
Gov101 Sep 2013 #80
Raffi Ella Sep 2013 #82
Gov101 Sep 2013 #83
Precisely Sep 2013 #69
Raffi Ella Sep 2013 #77
Precisely Sep 2013 #79
cynatnite Sep 2013 #71
Tikki Sep 2013 #73
Hekate Sep 2013 #84
elehhhhna Sep 2013 #74
jwirr Sep 2013 #76
handmade34 Sep 2013 #78
marshall Sep 2013 #81
Lancero Sep 2013 #85
Please login to view edit histories.