Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

HardTimes99

(2,049 posts)
30. Technical note: Imperialism does not require a monarch. See the Great Powers, ca.
Mon Sep 2, 2013, 09:47 AM
Sep 2013

1913. Sure, Germany and Britain each had a titular monarch (in Germany's case, the Kaiser). But each country's imperial policies were ratified by its respective parliamentary structures time and again.

Obama begs to differ on the judge, jury, and executioner part, Mr. Grayson nt msongs Sep 2013 #1
Obama? malaise Sep 2013 #9
And currently President Obama's. truebluegreen Sep 2013 #42
It's almost as if the hots to launch war on Syria were as smoldering as Bushco's hots to indepat Sep 2013 #48
And of COURSE we can't change that.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #45
We all hoped for change malaise Sep 2013 #46
We got it. They would have done "a proportional response" and we would hear about it after.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #47
True malaise Sep 2013 #49
I want a true humanitarian response.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #50
What exactly does a humanitarian response look like .... MindMover Sep 2013 #53
It sure doesn't require weapons.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #54
Ah, if the world was only still flat .... MindMover Sep 2013 #56
I'd rather protect the helpless. I could then say it was a noble cause. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #58
So how would you go about protecting the helpless in Syria .... ? MindMover Sep 2013 #59
Two words: Cease Fire. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #61
What world are you living in ... ??? MindMover Sep 2013 #68
One where those words are remembered. Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #69
When those words mean nothing to one side or the other ... MindMover Sep 2013 #70
That's because there are multiple sides and they aren't talking to each other.... Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #72
What do you think the world is anyway,....free to do what it wants? Spitfire of ATJ Sep 2013 #55
Congressman Grayson is correct (as usual). Turbineguy Sep 2013 #2
+1 Scuba Sep 2013 #17
K&R B Calm Sep 2013 #3
A voice of sanity newfie11 Sep 2013 #4
Are we vigilantes? Downwinder Sep 2013 #5
No, we are Imperialists without a King. Coyotl Sep 2013 #21
Technical note: Imperialism does not require a monarch. See the Great Powers, ca. HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #30
D'oh! Coyotl Sep 2013 #33
Sorry, didn't mean to belabor the obvious. Just didn't want people to confuse HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #34
Well we should Zimmerman the Syrians shouldn't we? dballance Sep 2013 #6
Irony is thick in this one... Mr_Teg Sep 2013 #10
Once Again our MSM is shown to be a total tool dballance Sep 2013 #7
+Infinity! - nt HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #31
I would call that a smack down. The only thing I can see is President has finally bonniebgood Sep 2013 #8
They are just going to say NO. Coyotl Sep 2013 #22
kr Norrin Radd Sep 2013 #11
That Was A Smackdown cantbeserious Sep 2013 #12
Exactly correct, Mr. Grayson drynberg Sep 2013 #13
K & R x 1000 nt littlewolf Sep 2013 #14
Mr. Grayson is a voice of reason, please call to set-up the International Court Sunlei Sep 2013 #15
K&R forestpath Sep 2013 #16
Alex Nit Witt kept asking the same question as if she expected a different response! Dustlawyer Sep 2013 #18
she was not prepared for a Congressman with integrity. nashville_brook Sep 2013 #27
You got that right! You would think they would know him by now! Dustlawyer Sep 2013 #29
Congressman Gibson is absolutely correct! n/t RoccoR5955 Sep 2013 #19
K&R for the sane reasoning of Congressman Alan Grayson. Thank you Congressman! Scuba Sep 2013 #20
ah, yes ... another RW example of the liberals being in "lockstep" with Der Fuhrer Obama ... zbdent Sep 2013 #23
I hold no brief for the racist Paul father and son clan. But Ron Paul did speak out publicly and HardTimes99 Sep 2013 #32
Even if we needed a World Police, Judge, Jury, & Executioner, it sure as hell shouldn't be the USA! Towlie Sep 2013 #24
Alan Grayson TNNurse Sep 2013 #25
K&R Mr Grayson, as usual, is right. BTW, Mr Obama, any comments on Napalm-B and White Phosphorus? idwiyo Sep 2013 #26
If we could just see... Half-Century Man Sep 2013 #28
Ahhh.. Alan, don't like history so will ignore it, Grayson whistler162 Sep 2013 #35
Hi whistler! I think things are going as they should, Alan can speak at length in the HoR. He didn't freshwest Sep 2013 #52
K&R nt alsame Sep 2013 #36
We're not, except when it comes to Iran ProSense Sep 2013 #37
Internationally we appear to think we are, Obama (and indeed most authoritarians) saw the movie Dragonfli Sep 2013 #38
Whoa libodem Sep 2013 #39
Oh, she was sooo disappointed in the congressman's answers, lol. Enthusiast Sep 2013 #40
K&R. pacalo Sep 2013 #41
Kick (and donate here:) grahamhgreen Sep 2013 #43
Grayson is, as always, CORRECT... Swede Atlanta Sep 2013 #44
Since when? JaneyVee Sep 2013 #51
The voice of common sense. Wish we could clone him. n/t LibDemAlways Sep 2013 #57
Precisely, we are not the world's policemen, judge, nor jury. DeSwiss Sep 2013 #60
If not you then who else? Donald Ian Rankin Sep 2013 #62
Grayson is to be commended for his astute leadership of late 99th_Monkey Sep 2013 #63
But we sure act like it. tblue Sep 2013 #64
I usually agree with Grayson, but we have B Calm Sep 2013 #65
The Western world seems to have forgotten that avebury Sep 2013 #66
Use of Chemical Weapons treestar Sep 2013 #67
I think the human race is going to have to come clean on why we think we have to kill each other. freshwest Sep 2013 #73
The 1%/MIC disagrees. They believe that we are their personal private global police agency. Zorra Sep 2013 #71
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Alan Grayson "We Are NOT ...»Reply #30