Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
In reply to the discussion: So the DOJ acknowledges that the Bush War Criminals are guilty of crimes! [View all]sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)165. You just hurled a personal attack at me. I don't know you. Explain that insult please or
take it back.
Or you have the option to leave it and risk someone alerting it. It is a FALSE accusation and against the Community standards here.
I will not alert on it. I want people to see a perfect demonstration of what many people have here have been pointing out. I sound like DEMOCRAT for the record. You sound like someone who is not interested in dialogue only in flinging around mindless insults.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
165 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
So the DOJ acknowledges that the Bush War Criminals are guilty of crimes! [View all]
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
OP
What is an 'ODSers'?? Enquiring minds would like to know what insult is being
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#72
Thanks, it's hard to keep up the epithets being invented for Democrats on this
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#74
No, ODS refers to someone who will irrationally believes anything that puts Obama in a bad light.
uhnope
Aug 2013
#95
Your back and forth with Summer H. shows your argument is impenetrable to facts
uhnope
Aug 2013
#162
Summer H. has no idea what she is talking about regarding this case. My 'motivation'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#164
Really? Then why is it being used here on a Democratic forum against Democrats who
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#107
They always take these legal situations and twist them into something they are not
treestar
Aug 2013
#99
I know we can't give up. But with new revelation, 'impeachment is off the table'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#14
Funny, you sound a lot like a right wing infiltrator with the TP "Dems as bad as GOP"
uhnope
Aug 2013
#163
You just hurled a personal attack at me. I don't know you. Explain that insult please or
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#165
Starting wars based on lies that kill hundreds of thousands is just part of their job description.
Tierra_y_Libertad
Aug 2013
#10
Very *few people* across the Globe know enough of how American politics works.
Amonester
Aug 2013
#25
I don't believe that at all. Americans know very little about the news anywhere
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#26
A very small 'fringe' of dreamers in the overall picture (of 7 billion humans) protests.
Amonester
Aug 2013
#119
It is the 'dreamers' as you call them, who have consistently changed the world. Conservatives
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#133
How is asking that they have to pay out in a lawsuit for what they did BECAUSE
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#149
I have the same principles I had when Bush was occupying the WH. I haven't changed one
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#143
President Truman had a sign on his desk in the Oval Office that read, "The buck stops here!"
Dustlawyer
Aug 2013
#28
So, in theory, Bush was just following orders? Wait a minute, wasn't he the Commander-in-Chief?
Coyotl
Aug 2013
#29
I think the point that this war was planned before they took office is startlingly legitimate
Samantha
Aug 2013
#33
I hate it that victims have to take civil action to even have their voices heard...
Violet_Crumble
Aug 2013
#52
I haven't seen that, thanks for the link I will definitely watch it later when I
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#54
If the DOJ is granted its request for immunity, the judge will do nothing of the kind. The
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#116
It might be better for your own sake if you refrained from posting 'what Sid thinks'
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#48
Why are victims of Bush War Crimes forced to try to get justice in Civil Suits?
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#53
Her civil suit, and I'm really surprised you're actually acknowledging it is a civil suit...
SidDithers
Aug 2013
#66
How would I have it done? The same way it is done for every defendant in a lawsuit.
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#111
She already dealt with that in her Complaint, she anticipated this 'spin' that she
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#154
Haven't read the DOJ's resonse asking for immunity either. Didn't see the claim that the
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#115
This comment is ALL ABOUT ME! Lol! While I'm always flattered to be the focus of attention
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#110
Do you know what this OP is about? The Bush cabal have been sued by a victim of their
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#113
Yes, exactly. And it didn't work too well back then. The plaintiff in this case
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#65
Where are the Criminal Charges?? And why should it apply to ANY case involving the Bush
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#117
She addressed that in her complaint. She explained why the immunity claim doesn't apply
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#132
I understand that, now. At one time not so long ago, I was naive enough to believe that they
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#141
''Money trumps peace.'' -- George Walker Bush*, ''president'' of the United States, Feb. 14, 2007
Octafish
Aug 2013
#86
And that was some crack legal response. But thank you anyhow. I guess you don't have any
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#127
Yes, we most certainly did hear it from the DOJ. Still haven't read their response?
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#160
Yes, that was a very interesting way of putting it. So who is this US Government that
sabrina 1
Aug 2013
#157